M
Meat Plow
Guest
On Fri, 20 May 2011 13:25:54 +1000, Franc Zabkar wrote:
engineering track on the drive media at the factory. This is why a low
level format would probably destroy the drive. I figured sooner or later
it would be written to the drives electronics as they advanced.
--
Live Fast Die Young, Leave A Pretty Corpse
I've heard most of that before. It all used to be written to anOn Thu, 19 May 2011 22:10:27 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow <mhywattt@yahoo.com
put finger to keyboard and composed:
I was under the assumption and don't ask why, newer drives have
engineering data written to NVRAM on the drive's board.
Head characteristics vary significantly. Some have better frequency
response than others, or they may have variations in the separation
between the read and write elements. To take advantage of the better
performing heads, drive manufacturers implement VBPI (Variable Bits Per
Inch) and VTPI (Variable Tracks Per Inch). The "adaptive" data for each
head need to be stored in NVRAM so that the drive's MCU can find the SA
(System Area).
This article should explain it:
http://hddscan.com/doc/HDD_Tracks_and_Zones.html
You can see the adaptive data for a Seagate 7200.12 here:
http://forum.hddguru.com/seagate-7200-t10899.html
- Franc Zabkar
engineering track on the drive media at the factory. This is why a low
level format would probably destroy the drive. I figured sooner or later
it would be written to the drives electronics as they advanced.
--
Live Fast Die Young, Leave A Pretty Corpse