G
George Herold
Guest
On Jan 9, 5:56 pm, Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca> wrote:
to start a new thread. (That's my guess anyway.)
George H.
Hmm, I think Ian was asking a new question. He just didn't know howOn Wed, 9 Jan 2013, ianphilipho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 31, 2004 10:02:30 PM UTC-4, Scott Zechman wrote:
Hi all,
I have a very very basic knowedge of electroics. I have a project in mind
that i would like to build but have no idea where to even get started. I
looked over a few posts in this group and they are over my head. Is there a
web site that would have a "getting started" section for someone with my
very limited knowledge? If more details are needed on my project please let
me know. This is a one time project and I am not persuing a career in
electronics, so all the help i can get would be apprecated. If this is the
wrong group to post this in, please parden the intrusion.
thanks,
Scott
This is my first post to a Google group, so hopefully I'm doing this
right and posting in the right place. My interest is in elementary
electronics. I'm a total beginer who will be trying to learn basicaly on
my own. My first tools are a learning kit called Snap Circuits and a
multimeter. Which brings me to my first question. I built a simple
circuit in the kit: It is 2 aa bateries in a battery holder, a switch,
and a small motor. I'm told that a aa battery puts out about 1.5
volts.And when I measure across the batteries I get about 3.5v which
makes sense. But when I throw the switch and turn the motor on then I'm
reading like 9 volts across the motor. That does'nt make sense to me. It
seems voltage should be decreased by the resistance of the motor, not
increased. Can someone explain?
Did you read the original message, that was posted back in 2004, almost 9
years ago? Did you read the rest of the thread, that might have some
pointers for the beginner?
Did you see my reply to the idiot who replied to this really old thread
via google back in September?
And you replied to a message from July 31st, 2004.
The guy is likely not still waiting for an answer (there were a few
answers back then when it was relevant) and chances are good he's no
longer a beginner after eight years. Either he's given up, or he's
become more capable.
If a message is older than 30 days, don't respond to it, not via google
at least and google really needs to fix that problem again.
I still have no idea why people are replying to old posts, though in the
September resurrection, it clearly was so someone could promote their
website. That doesn't excuse why it's being resurrected again four months
later.
If you have something to say, start a thread. Even if it's about
something old, don't reply to an old thread, the context is missing except
for people using google (and those of us who see what's happening), the
person who posted originally isnt' likely to still be here
If you actually did a search on something that interested you, and want
more details, don't reply to that thread (the ability to do so is a bug
that google needs to fix), but start a new thread, referencing the old or
quoting some of the old and then asking what you don't understand.
It's just ridiculous to post a reply to an old thread, and ridiculous to
post to an old thread that has no relevance to your question.
Michael- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
to start a new thread. (That's my guess anyway.)
George H.