M
Martin Brown
Guest
On 04/08/2020 11:07, jrwalliker@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. The way that the prisms are used for near perpendicular entry and
exit of the light rays and a total internal reflection there is very
little dispersive effect at all. UV doesn\'t go through glass very well.
The lenses of binoculars need to be achromatic doublets. There is no
such thing as non-dispersive glass. Only clear glasses with different
dispersions such that a well chosen pair can make a workable achromat
(matched focus for two wavelenghts) or apochromat (three).
One of the exotic solutions to the problem uses single crystal calcium
fluorite as an optical element which is brittle as hell to work with.
The OP might stand a chance with the photoelectric effect from a cerium
metal \"flint\" sold for outdoorsmen to strike energetic sparks onto
tinder. That has a metallic workfunction of about 3eV which is ~UV
photon range. Might be worth a look in the SciAm Amateur Scientist
archives in case it has been done before.
I think the same sort of flint material is used in some cheap disposable
lighters but I have never tested it. Most rare earth metals are in the
same ballpark for WF so any of them ought to work.
--
Regards,
Martin Brown
On Tuesday, 4 August 2020 06:46:46 UTC+1, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Indeed, wonder how far into the UV a normal prism of an old pair
of binoculars will go,
by rotating it you can make a nice spectrometer.
Would the prism in binoculars be made from dispersive glass?
Yes. The way that the prisms are used for near perpendicular entry and
exit of the light rays and a total internal reflection there is very
little dispersive effect at all. UV doesn\'t go through glass very well.
The lenses of binoculars need to be achromatic doublets. There is no
such thing as non-dispersive glass. Only clear glasses with different
dispersions such that a well chosen pair can make a workable achromat
(matched focus for two wavelenghts) or apochromat (three).
One of the exotic solutions to the problem uses single crystal calcium
fluorite as an optical element which is brittle as hell to work with.
The OP might stand a chance with the photoelectric effect from a cerium
metal \"flint\" sold for outdoorsmen to strike energetic sparks onto
tinder. That has a metallic workfunction of about 3eV which is ~UV
photon range. Might be worth a look in the SciAm Amateur Scientist
archives in case it has been done before.
I think the same sort of flint material is used in some cheap disposable
lighters but I have never tested it. Most rare earth metals are in the
same ballpark for WF so any of them ought to work.
--
Regards,
Martin Brown