Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On 6/02/2021 10:47 am, John Doe wrote:
Nothing but a troll...
Takes one to recognize one oh brainless one.
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: This is not a google group <not.google.group@not.google.invalid
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 18:50:12 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <rvpcp4$179$1@gioia.aioe.org
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <5dbc9fbb-777c-4858-9f31-91d20a48b662n@googlegroups.com> <rvk7vh$9ur$1@dont-email.me> <j6ednUKFPdihf4D9nZ2dnUU7-KGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <rvkvv8$t8p$1@dont-email.me> <YK2dncDa-sLZvYP9nZ2dnUU7-KGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <3ab8bebc-958c-4927-bd09-816db03a56e2n@googlegroups.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55522
Stevo <newsolutionstech@gmail.com> wrote:
Please quit ruining the Google group for everyone.
This is not a google group.
This is a Usenet news group.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet
The google groups UI simply provides an interface to the Usenet
newsgroup you are reading.
Well Neeny Narny Noo google grooper !!On Friday, February 5, 2021 at 11:51:24 PM UTC-5, RheillyPhoull wrote:
On 6/02/2021 10:47 am, John Doe wrote:
Nothing but a troll...
Takes one to recognize one oh brainless one.
You people with the off topic messages. What are you, toddlers in nursery school? Please quit ruining the Google group for everyone.
Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Rich wrote:
John Doe wrote:
I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the circuit?
Of course the resistor must handle the current.
A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.
Any problems with that?
If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.
If it\'s a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?
No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the
voltage changes.
Then your answer should be \"Yes\", given the same amount of time.
Why are you fighting this?
Do you think it makes you look smart?
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: amdx <amdx@knology.net
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:08:48 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <s02032$24j$1@dont-email.me
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 01:08:50 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host=\"a7beaec07e85e5e30d97199ae0ac4d1e\"; logging-data=\"2195\"; mail-complaints-to=\"abuse@eternal-september.org\"; posting-account=\"U2FsdGVkX19Ref1YlAJRe+Rs91ys8cv4\"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C4Uav+90TmtHgqpw1b4SgwxfBSk=
In-Reply-To: <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 210210-4, 02/10/2021), Outbound message
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55525
On 2/1/2021 5:26 AM, John Doe wrote:
Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Rich wrote:
John Doe wrote:
I can put a resistor after a voltage that\'s too high for the circuit?
Of course the resistor must handle the current.
A decoupling capacitor after the resistor.
Any problems with that?
If your load has a variable current draw, then you will also have a
variable voltage on the load side of the resistor.
If it\'s a big capacitor, the voltage variation is minimal?
No, the size of the capacitor simply determines the rate at which the
voltage changes.
Then your answer should be \"Yes\", given the same amount of time.
Why are you fighting this?
Do you think it makes you look smart?
¶ÿNow you have made yourself look ignorant, which you are, otherwise you
would not have ask the question.
¶ÿSay your device needs 9V and you have a 12V source. At some point in
time you measure the current your device draws and it is
20ma, so you decide you need a series 150 ohm resistor.¶ÿ You have it all
figured out. Then at some point it fails to work.
At some point the motor in this device (the one you didn\'t explain )
turns on and the voltage drops to 4 volts causing the circuit to fail to
operate.
¶ÿDo you want to calculate the capacitance needed to keep you supply
voltage within 5% of your required 9v?
Or do you want to just admit it is a big ass cap and a regulator may be
better.
On the other hand you could give us details of the circuit, so it would
not be a guessing game.
¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ¶ÿ Mikek
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
I see you keep posting all the header information, what is the purposeAs discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator looks good.
I\'m easy.
On 2/10/2021 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:
As discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator
looks good.
I\'m easy.
I see you keep posting all the header information, what is the
purpose of that?
In sci.electronics.basics amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote:
On 2/10/2021 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:
As discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator
looks good.
I\'m easy.
I see you keep posting all the header information, what is the
purpose of that?
That appears to be Mr Doe\'s signal that he has switched into troll
mode.
If you read through the first few posts in this thread, you\'ll see that
Mr Doe is indeed quite capable of proper quoting. But once he appears
to get ticked off, he toggles into troll mode and starts quoting
excessive header information (and top posting as well).
He seems to have a very Dr. Jeckyl/Mr. Hyde aspect to his postings.
But that takes extra effort on his part, what is his purpose in doing it?
It takes a two syllable voice command... \"on top\".
Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who enjoys
systemwide macros in windows.
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: amdx <amdx@knology.net
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:20:58 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <s05vbr$1nn$1@dont-email.me
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <s02032$24j$1@dont-email.me> <s025kl$ueb$2@dont-email.me> <s03e48$f5h$1@dont-email.me> <s03i22$1rhu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <s03mtt$l30$1@dont-email.me> <s03qiv$gne$3@dont-email.me
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:20:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host=\"43ff3bc1054611fd024c42d1e5dc122c\"; logging-data=\"1783\"; mail-complaints-to=\"abuse@eternal-september.org\"; posting-account=\"U2FsdGVkX1/nI0UPLjX+uyhlM6Vcp3CA\"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WK9CNOAcu2WyILulMJNe8clUum8=
In-Reply-To: <s03qiv$gne$3@dont-email.me
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 210212-4, 02/12/2021), Outbound message
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55532
On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote:
It takes a two syllable voice command... \"on top\".
Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who enjoys
systemwide macros in windows.
Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it?
What do you think you are doing to the person who\'s header you put in
the body of the post.
I just want to understand what advantage you get from this act.
Is it something I should start doing when I\'m disagree with a poster?
And should I top post when I do it?
Or, am I over thinking this and you can\'t write a macro to do a proper
post with a quote?
Mikek
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote:
It takes a two syllable voice command... \"on top\".
Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who
enjoys systemwide macros in windows.
Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it?
What do you think you are doing to the person who\'s header you put in
the body of the post.
Is it something I should start doing when I\'m disagree with a poster?
And should I top post when I do it?
Or, am I over thinking this and you can\'t write a macro to do a
proper post with a quote?
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bertrand Sindri <bertrand.sindri@dont.spam.me@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <s066u1$1iip$1@gioia.aioe.org
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <s02032$24j$1@dont-email.me> <s025kl$ueb$2@dont-email.me> <s03e48$f5h$1@dont-email.me> <s03i22$1rhu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <s03mtt$l30$1@dont-email.me> <s03qiv$gne$3@dont-email.me> <s05vbr$1nn$1@dont-email.me
NNTP-Posting-Host: nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55534
amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote:
On 2/11/2021 11:47 AM, John Doe wrote:
It takes a two syllable voice command... \"on top\".
Voice-activated scripting is a whole new world for someone who
enjoys systemwide macros in windows.
Ok, so you can do it easily, but why do you do it?
The appearance on this end of \"why\" looks to be: \"to be irritating\".
What do you think you are doing to the person who\'s header you put in
the body of the post.
The appearance given out, when the pattern happens, is that the Mr Hyde
personality half of Mr Doe does it for the purpose of irritation of the
poster to which Mr Doe has chosen to \"troll\".
I just want to understand what advantage you get from this act.
There seems to be no advantage. Other than to overtely be irritating.
Is it something I should start doing when I\'m disagree with a poster?
And should I top post when I do it?
Or, am I over thinking this and you can\'t write a macro to do a
proper post with a quote?
Except that when Mr Doe is operating from his Dr Jeckyl personality
half, he is quite capable of proper quoting, quote trimming, avoiding
quoting headers, and bottom posting. Implying he can write a macro to
do a proper post.
There are at least two explanations for this:
One - Mr Doe has a proper voice activated macro that can quote properly
and bottom post -- which implies that the header quoting top posting Mr
Hyde personality is a deliberate choice on his part.
Two - Mr Doe only uses his voice activated macro when trolling. Which
is, again, a deliberate choice on his part when the Mr Hyde personality
is activated.
Both boil down to deliberate choices on Mr Doe\'s part.
So I submit that he deliberatly chooses the top posting, header
quoting, Mr Hyde version to be irritating to the person to which he is
responding.
Nobody forces anybody to read anybody else\'s posts on USENET. The idea
USENET posts must conform to some standard is nothing but a ridiculous
troll. You can cope with it or you can ignore it.
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bertrand Sindri <bertrand.sindri@dont.spam.me@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Followup-To: sci.electronics.basics
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:21:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <s03i22$1rhu$1@gioia.aioe.org
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <s02032$24j$1@dont-email.me> <s025kl$ueb$2@dont-email.me> <s03e48$f5h$1@dont-email.me
NNTP-Posting-Host: nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55528
In sci.electronics.basics amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote:
On 2/10/2021 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:
As discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator
looks good.
I\'m easy.
I see you keep posting all the header information, what is the
purpose of that?
That appears to be Mr Doe\'s signal that he has switched into troll
mode.
If you read through the first few posts in this thread, you\'ll see that
Mr Doe is indeed quite capable of proper quoting. But once he appears
to get ticked off, he toggles into troll mode and starts quoting
excessive header information (and top posting as well).
He seems to have a very Dr. Jeckyl/Mr. Hyde aspect to his postings.
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bertrand Sindri <bertrand.sindri@dont.spam.me@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Followup-To: sci.electronics.basics
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:21:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <s03i22$1rhu$1@gioia.aioe.org
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <s02032$24j$1@dont-email.me> <s025kl$ueb$2@dont-email.me> <s03e48$f5h$1@dont-email.me
NNTP-Posting-Host: nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55528
In sci.electronics.basics amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote:
On 2/10/2021 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:
As discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator
looks good.
I\'m easy.
I see you keep posting all the header information, what is the
purpose of that?
That appears to be Mr Doe\'s signal that he has switched into troll
mode.
If you read through the first few posts in this thread, you\'ll see that
Mr Doe is indeed quite capable of proper quoting. But once he appears
to get ticked off, he toggles into troll mode and starts quoting
excessive header information (and top posting as well).
He seems to have a very Dr. Jeckyl/Mr. Hyde aspect to his postings.
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bertrand Sindri <bertrand.sindri@dont.spam.me@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
Subject: Re: Use resistor instead of regulator?
Followup-To: sci.electronics.basics
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:21:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <s03i22$1rhu$1@gioia.aioe.org
References: <rv455v$6ho$1@dont-email.me> <rv4oh1$cfb$1@dont-email.me> <rv6617$2rs$9@dont-email.me> <rv6ijs$qed$1@dont-email.me> <rv8ogi$sku$8@dont-email.me> <s02032$24j$1@dont-email.me> <s025kl$ueb$2@dont-email.me> <s03e48$f5h$1@dont-email.me
NNTP-Posting-Host: nzqwpW7fgmak1IV6pg8vew.user.gioia.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.basics:55528
In sci.electronics.basics amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote:
On 2/10/2021 8:43 PM, John Doe wrote:
As discussed in the design group thread, a low dropout regulator
looks good.
I\'m easy.
I see you keep posting all the header information, what is the
purpose of that?
That appears to be Mr Doe\'s signal that he has switched into troll
mode.
If you read through the first few posts in this thread, you\'ll see that
Mr Doe is indeed quite capable of proper quoting. But once he appears
to get ticked off, he toggles into troll mode and starts quoting
excessive header information (and top posting as well).
He seems to have a very Dr. Jeckyl/Mr. Hyde aspect to his postings.