Two sides of a coin...

D

Don Y

Guest
<https://cleantechnica.com/2022/02/11/phevs-pollute-2-4x-more-than-official-ratings-lets-fix-the-eu-loophole/>

<https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/14/reducing-carbon-emissions-hybrid-vs-plug-in-hybrid-vs-battery-electric/>
 
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:31:58 -0700, Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/02/11/phevs-pollute-2-4x-more-than-official-ratings-lets-fix-the-eu-loophole/

https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/14/reducing-carbon-emissions-hybrid-vs-plug-in-hybrid-vs-battery-electric/

I wonder, on average, how many phev miles are driven using
electricity, as opposed to gasoline. I\'d expect that lots of people
gas up instead of charging. Saving The Earth is inconvenient.
 
On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 1:12:49 PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:31:58 -0700, Don Y
blocked...@foo.invalid> wrote:

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/02/11/phevs-pollute-2-4x-more-than-official-ratings-lets-fix-the-eu-loophole/

https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/14/reducing-carbon-emissions-hybrid-vs-plug-in-hybrid-vs-battery-electric/

I wonder, on average, how many phev miles are driven using electricity, as opposed to gasoline. I\'d expect that lots of people gas up instead of charging. Saving The Earth is inconvenient.

But it does save you money. The electricity network delivers joules more cheaply than gas stations.

We are in transition at the moment, and there will be more charging stations and fewer gas station as time goes by.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On 8/15/2023 5:31 PM, Don Y wrote:
https://cleantechnica.com/2022/02/11/phevs-pollute-2-4x-more-than-official-ratings-lets-fix-the-eu-loophole/

https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/14/reducing-carbon-emissions-hybrid-vs-plug-in-hybrid-vs-battery-electric/

Telling it like it is:

<snews://news.eternal-september.org:563/ph3ksv0j6f@drn.newsguy.com>

I wonder where \"electricity generated from small gas engines\"
fits on the scale of emissions?

[Note Hill has rooftop solar]
 
On 8/15/2023 11:12 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:31:58 -0700, Don Y
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/02/11/phevs-pollute-2-4x-more-than-official-ratings-lets-fix-the-eu-loophole/

https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/14/reducing-carbon-emissions-hybrid-vs-plug-in-hybrid-vs-battery-electric/

I wonder, on average, how many phev miles are driven using
electricity, as opposed to gasoline. I\'d expect that lots of people
gas up instead of charging. Saving The Earth is inconvenient.

For me it\'s as easy as plugging into an extension cord overnight, which
is pretty convenient.

Even for cars with engines, fully mechanical transmissions are so 20th
century. Like boiler pre-heaters once the hardware is economical enough
to recapture waste energy and feed it back into the system, there\'s
little reason no to include it
 
On 8/16/2023 12:03 AM, bitrex wrote:
For me it\'s as easy as plugging into an extension cord overnight, which is
pretty convenient.

Yet, it must not be for many people if they\'ve, instead, opted to let the
engine charge their battery. And, visit a gas station *more* often to
compensate for their laziness wrt plugging in their cars? Are electric
car drivers just lazy?

As Winfield Hill said (to you):

\"Do you mostly charge your Volt from the AC power line,
or from its gas engine? I park my Prius on the street
and so far there\'s no high-current AC outlet at work,
so it\'s easier to just charge it with its gas engine.\"

His home sure looks suburban enough -- double-wide driveway,
two car garage (shitload of solar panels) -- yet he chooses to
park his silver prius out on the street?

Imagine what folks who live in apartment buildings, or *in* cities
must have to deal with!

[Ah, but the cities will pepper their streets with charging stations
instead of parking meters and apartment houses will install a hundred
in their parking lots -- all for free! Thos of us without EVs will
get monthly stipend checks from the gummit as compensation...]

Even for cars with engines, fully mechanical transmissions are so 20th century.
Like boiler pre-heaters once the hardware is economical enough to recapture
waste energy and feed it back into the system, there\'s little reason no to
include it
 
On 8/16/2023 1:12 AM, Don Y wrote:
On 8/16/2023 12:03 AM, bitrex wrote:
For me it\'s as easy as plugging into an extension cord overnight, which is
pretty convenient.

Yet, it must not be for many people if they\'ve, instead, opted to let the
engine charge their battery.  And, visit a gas station *more* often to
compensate for their laziness wrt plugging in their cars?  Are electric
car drivers just lazy?

As Winfield Hill said (to you):

     \"Do you mostly charge your Volt from the AC power line,
     or from its gas engine?  I park my Prius on the street
     and so far there\'s no high-current AC outlet at work,
     so it\'s easier to just charge it with its gas engine.\"

His home sure looks suburban enough -- double-wide driveway,
two car garage (shitload of solar panels) -- yet he chooses to
park his silver prius out on the street?

Imagine what folks who live in apartment buildings, or *in* cities
must have to deal with!

[Ah, but the cities will pepper their streets with charging stations
instead of parking meters and apartment houses will install a hundred
in their parking lots -- all for free!  Thos of us without EVs will
get monthly stipend checks from the gummit as compensation...]

Shame that deep blue Massachusetts apparently hasn\'t decided to do so...
 
On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 4:13:11 AM UTC-4, Don Y wrote:
On 8/16/2023 12:03 AM, bitrex wrote:
For me it\'s as easy as plugging into an extension cord overnight, which is
pretty convenient.
Yet, it must not be for many people if they\'ve, instead, opted to let the
engine charge their battery. And, visit a gas station *more* often to
compensate for their laziness wrt plugging in their cars? Are electric
car drivers just lazy?

As Winfield Hill said (to you):

\"Do you mostly charge your Volt from the AC power line,
or from its gas engine? I park my Prius on the street
and so far there\'s no high-current AC outlet at work,
so it\'s easier to just charge it with its gas engine.\"

His home sure looks suburban enough -- double-wide driveway,
two car garage (shitload of solar panels) -- yet he chooses to
park his silver prius out on the street?

Imagine what folks who live in apartment buildings, or *in* cities
must have to deal with!

[Ah, but the cities will pepper their streets with charging stations
instead of parking meters and apartment houses will install a hundred
in their parking lots -- all for free! Thos of us without EVs will
get monthly stipend checks from the gummit as compensation...]

There are times when you just get weird.

You are kinda another Jan, with better English skills.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 03:03:21 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 8/15/2023 11:12 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:31:58 -0700, Don Y
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/02/11/phevs-pollute-2-4x-more-than-official-ratings-lets-fix-the-eu-loophole/

https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/14/reducing-carbon-emissions-hybrid-vs-plug-in-hybrid-vs-battery-electric/

I wonder, on average, how many phev miles are driven using
electricity, as opposed to gasoline. I\'d expect that lots of people
gas up instead of charging. Saving The Earth is inconvenient.




For me it\'s as easy as plugging into an extension cord overnight, which
is pretty convenient.

That\'s not practical for a lot of people.

I saw one chart online that says that some high-end hybrids get under
10% of their miles from battery power.

Even for cars with engines, fully mechanical transmissions are so 20th
century. Like boiler pre-heaters once the hardware is economical enough
to recapture waste energy and feed it back into the system, there\'s
little reason no to include it

There is sadly no mechanical equivalent of a switching regulator.
Gears are fixed ratios and variable ratio systems are, so far, all
inefficient or plain bad. CVTs are often lemons.

My Audi has a tap-switching sort of tranny, 6 speeds, odd and even
gear sets, and a SPDT clutch, no torque converter. That\'s OK.

Transformer tap switching was interesting, back when things started
with a 60 Hz tranny.
 
onsdag den 16. august 2023 kl. 18.15.48 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 03:03:21 -0400, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:

On 8/15/2023 11:12 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:31:58 -0700, Don Y
blocked...@foo.invalid> wrote:

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/02/11/phevs-pollute-2-4x-more-than-official-ratings-lets-fix-the-eu-loophole/

https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/14/reducing-carbon-emissions-hybrid-vs-plug-in-hybrid-vs-battery-electric/

I wonder, on average, how many phev miles are driven using
electricity, as opposed to gasoline. I\'d expect that lots of people
gas up instead of charging. Saving The Earth is inconvenient.




For me it\'s as easy as plugging into an extension cord overnight, which
is pretty convenient.
That\'s not practical for a lot of people.

I saw one chart online that says that some high-end hybrids get under
10% of their miles from battery power.

Even for cars with engines, fully mechanical transmissions are so 20th
century. Like boiler pre-heaters once the hardware is economical enough
to recapture waste energy and feed it back into the system, there\'s
little reason no to include it
There is sadly no mechanical equivalent of a switching regulator.
Gears are fixed ratios and variable ratio systems are, so far, all
inefficient or plain bad. CVTs are often lemons.

series hybrid, no need for gears it is all done in the motor inverter

And with a battery as buffer it lets you use a an engine sized for your average
power need that\'s much more efficient that sized for peak need. And run it at
a constant, efficient, load and speed

might not be many miles coming from the battery, but not having to make 20hp with an engine designed for 200hp
adds efficiency
 
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 09:15:26 -0700, John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 03:03:21 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 8/15/2023 11:12 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:31:58 -0700, Don Y
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/02/11/phevs-pollute-2-4x-more-than-official-ratings-lets-fix-the-eu-loophole/

https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/14/reducing-carbon-emissions-hybrid-vs-plug-in-hybrid-vs-battery-electric/

I wonder, on average, how many phev miles are driven using
electricity, as opposed to gasoline. I\'d expect that lots of people
gas up instead of charging. Saving The Earth is inconvenient.




For me it\'s as easy as plugging into an extension cord overnight, which
is pretty convenient.

That\'s not practical for a lot of people.

I saw one chart online that says that some high-end hybrids get under
10% of their miles from battery power.

Sounds about right. The theory of the original hybrids was that the
ICE was sized to candle cruise, and the electric stuff provided the
power surge needed to accelerate fast enough to safely merge into 70
mph traffic on freeways. There was no intent to run on battery power
for cruising.

Joe Gwinn
 
On 8/16/2023 10:49 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Sounds about right. The theory of the original hybrids was that the
ICE was sized to candle cruise, and the electric stuff provided the
power surge needed to accelerate fast enough to safely merge into 70
mph traffic on freeways. There was no intent to run on battery power
for cruising.

Exactly. It\'s not just \"accelerating to 70MPH\"; it\'s any time you need
to draw on the \"overprovisioned\" capacity of the ICE. Any ICE with a
real-time fuel efficiency gauge would make this pretty obvious to the
driver!

The fact that you can find V8\'s that will dynamically operate on just *4*
cylinders means the ICE is overprovisioned in many cases.

Putting a large battery in a vehicle as the *sole* power source
misses this point (unless you intend to accelerate continuously!)

The fact that people would find it easier to charge the battery from
the ICE suggests charging is an inconvenience in the eyes of many;
esp if they are going to have to \"gas up\" eventually!

OTOH, the extended range that the gasoline provides -- and its
ready, convenient availability -- diminishes the \"range fear\"
inherent in BEVs.
 
onsdag den 16. august 2023 kl. 20.47.20 UTC+2 skrev Don Y:
On 8/16/2023 10:49 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Sounds about right. The theory of the original hybrids was that the
ICE was sized to candle cruise, and the electric stuff provided the
power surge needed to accelerate fast enough to safely merge into 70
mph traffic on freeways. There was no intent to run on battery power
for cruising.
Exactly. It\'s not just \"accelerating to 70MPH\"; it\'s any time you need
to draw on the \"overprovisioned\" capacity of the ICE. Any ICE with a
real-time fuel efficiency gauge would make this pretty obvious to the
driver!

The fact that you can find V8\'s that will dynamically operate on just *4*
cylinders means the ICE is overprovisioned in many cases.

it takes maybe 30hp to drive a normal car at a steady 65-70mph on flat road
so by a factor of ~10?
 
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:01:15 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
wrote:

onsdag den 16. august 2023 kl. 20.47.20 UTC+2 skrev Don Y:
On 8/16/2023 10:49 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Sounds about right. The theory of the original hybrids was that the
ICE was sized to candle cruise, and the electric stuff provided the
power surge needed to accelerate fast enough to safely merge into 70
mph traffic on freeways. There was no intent to run on battery power
for cruising.
Exactly. It\'s not just \"accelerating to 70MPH\"; it\'s any time you need
to draw on the \"overprovisioned\" capacity of the ICE. Any ICE with a
real-time fuel efficiency gauge would make this pretty obvious to the
driver!

The fact that you can find V8\'s that will dynamically operate on just
*4*
cylinders means the ICE is overprovisioned in many cases.

it takes maybe 30hp to drive a normal car at a steady 65-70mph on flat
road so by a factor of ~10?

I worked with a dynamometer company engineer ~1990 who had just finished
initial test of 20 dynanometers at GM where one of the engines tested was
the one in his car. He recorded a HP vs intake manifold pressure curve,
fitted his car with an intake manifold pressure gauge, and determined that
his Chevy sedan with V8 engine used ~6 HP on a level road at a steady 60
MPH. Of course the ~200 HP engine was incredibly inefficient at that
power.
 
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 13:49:57 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 09:15:26 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:

On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 03:03:21 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 8/15/2023 11:12 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:31:58 -0700, Don Y
blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/02/11/phevs-pollute-2-4x-more-than-official-ratings-lets-fix-the-eu-loophole/

https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/14/reducing-carbon-emissions-hybrid-vs-plug-in-hybrid-vs-battery-electric/

I wonder, on average, how many phev miles are driven using
electricity, as opposed to gasoline. I\'d expect that lots of people
gas up instead of charging. Saving The Earth is inconvenient.




For me it\'s as easy as plugging into an extension cord overnight, which
is pretty convenient.

That\'s not practical for a lot of people.

I saw one chart online that says that some high-end hybrids get under
10% of their miles from battery power.

Sounds about right. The theory of the original hybrids was that the
ICE was sized to candle cruise, and the electric stuff provided the
power surge needed to accelerate fast enough to safely merge into 70
mph traffic on freeways. There was no intent to run on battery power
for cruising.

Joe Gwinn

The 10% I saw was for a plug-in hybrid, that\'s supposed to use battery
power for short trips. One plugin averaged 8% of its miles electric, a
BMW or something.

Maybe rich people buy plug-in hybrids for eco status but don\'t bother
to charge them in real life.
 
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:47:04 -0700, Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

On 8/16/2023 10:49 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Sounds about right. The theory of the original hybrids was that the
ICE was sized to candle cruise, and the electric stuff provided the
power surge needed to accelerate fast enough to safely merge into 70
mph traffic on freeways. There was no intent to run on battery power
for cruising.

Exactly. It\'s not just \"accelerating to 70MPH\"; it\'s any time you need
to draw on the \"overprovisioned\" capacity of the ICE. Any ICE with a
real-time fuel efficiency gauge would make this pretty obvious to the
driver!

The fact that you can find V8\'s that will dynamically operate on just *4*
cylinders means the ICE is overprovisioned in many cases.

Turbos are a similar idea, boost a small engine to its mechanical
limits, pass the EPA mileage tests, and let heavy-footed drivers waste
all the gas they want to.
 
On 8/16/2023 12:01 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
onsdag den 16. august 2023 kl. 20.47.20 UTC+2 skrev Don Y:
On 8/16/2023 10:49 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Sounds about right. The theory of the original hybrids was that the
ICE was sized to candle cruise, and the electric stuff provided the
power surge needed to accelerate fast enough to safely merge into 70
mph traffic on freeways. There was no intent to run on battery power
for cruising.
Exactly. It\'s not just \"accelerating to 70MPH\"; it\'s any time you need
to draw on the \"overprovisioned\" capacity of the ICE. Any ICE with a
real-time fuel efficiency gauge would make this pretty obvious to the
driver!

The fact that you can find V8\'s that will dynamically operate on just *4*
cylinders means the ICE is overprovisioned in many cases.

it takes maybe 30hp to drive a normal car at a steady 65-70mph on flat road
so by a factor of ~10?

That\'s probably \"ballpark\". Note that not all roads are flat.
And, you have to account for variations in wind speed, the need
to accelerate (to pass) *at* 60MPH, etc.

The engine also has to provide power for accessories that
may be in operation regardless of travel speed (e.g., ACbrrrr,
heat, entertainment, lighting, etc.)

[I\'ve seen estimates of ACbrrr loads varying from ~600W to 4KW,
based on how the cool air is distributed and controlled in the
vehicle. I spent 20 minutes in traffic, last week, traveling
half a mile (some idiot had closed 2 of 3 travel lanes during
\"rush hour\"). The car indicated I was getting like 3MPG.
When I broke free of the construction area, that immediately
climbed to ~25MPG for the remaining mile of my trip.]
 
onsdag den 16. august 2023 kl. 22.36.36 UTC+2 skrev Don Y:
On 8/16/2023 12:01 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
onsdag den 16. august 2023 kl. 20.47.20 UTC+2 skrev Don Y:
On 8/16/2023 10:49 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Sounds about right. The theory of the original hybrids was that the
ICE was sized to candle cruise, and the electric stuff provided the
power surge needed to accelerate fast enough to safely merge into 70
mph traffic on freeways. There was no intent to run on battery power
for cruising.
Exactly. It\'s not just \"accelerating to 70MPH\"; it\'s any time you need
to draw on the \"overprovisioned\" capacity of the ICE. Any ICE with a
real-time fuel efficiency gauge would make this pretty obvious to the
driver!

The fact that you can find V8\'s that will dynamically operate on just *4*
cylinders means the ICE is overprovisioned in many cases.

it takes maybe 30hp to drive a normal car at a steady 65-70mph on flat road
so by a factor of ~10?
That\'s probably \"ballpark\". Note that not all roads are flat.
And, you have to account for variations in wind speed, the need
to accelerate (to pass) *at* 60MPH, etc.

sure, but you don\'t need anything like 200-300hp on average

I spent 20 minutes in traffic, last week, traveling
half a mile (some idiot had closed 2 of 3 travel lanes during
\"rush hour\"). The car indicated I was getting like 3MPG.
When I broke free of the construction area, that immediately
climbed to ~25MPG for the remaining mile of my trip.]

perfect for an EV or hybrid
 
onsdag den 16. august 2023 kl. 22.33.17 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:47:04 -0700, Don Y
blocked...@foo.invalid> wrote:

On 8/16/2023 10:49 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
Sounds about right. The theory of the original hybrids was that the
ICE was sized to candle cruise, and the electric stuff provided the
power surge needed to accelerate fast enough to safely merge into 70
mph traffic on freeways. There was no intent to run on battery power
for cruising.

Exactly. It\'s not just \"accelerating to 70MPH\"; it\'s any time you need
to draw on the \"overprovisioned\" capacity of the ICE. Any ICE with a
real-time fuel efficiency gauge would make this pretty obvious to the
driver!

The fact that you can find V8\'s that will dynamically operate on just *4*
cylinders means the ICE is overprovisioned in many cases.

Turbos are a similar idea, boost a small engine to its mechanical
limits, pass the EPA mileage tests, and let heavy-footed drivers waste
all the gas they want to.

turbo engines can be very efficient, about a third of the energy in
the fuel goes out the exhaust, makes sense to use that energy for
something useful

F1 engine have a generator on the turbo and achieve 50% efficiency
which it amazing for a small gasoline combustion engine
 
On Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 9:15:48 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 03:03:21 -0400, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:

On 8/15/2023 11:12 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 17:31:58 -0700, Don Y
blocked...@foo.invalid> wrote:

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/02/11/phevs-pollute-2-4x-more-than-official-ratings-lets-fix-the-eu-loophole/

https://cleantechnica.com/2019/06/14/reducing-carbon-emissions-hybrid-vs-plug-in-hybrid-vs-battery-electric/

I wonder, on average, how many phev miles are driven using
electricity, as opposed to gasoline. I\'d expect that lots of people
gas up instead of charging. Saving The Earth is inconvenient.




For me it\'s as easy as plugging into an extension cord overnight, which
is pretty convenient.
That\'s not practical for a lot of people.

I saw one chart online that says that some high-end hybrids get under
10% of their miles from battery power.

Even for cars with engines, fully mechanical transmissions are so 20th
century. Like boiler pre-heaters once the hardware is economical enough
to recapture waste energy and feed it back into the system, there\'s
little reason no to include it
There is sadly no mechanical equivalent of a switching regulator.
Gears are fixed ratios and variable ratio systems are, so far, all
inefficient or plain bad. CVTs are often lemons.

Why not tap into the ABS sensor? I just need a very rough switching between 168V and 392V.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top