J
john jakson
Guest
"Symon" <symon_brewer@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<c6m6p9$dct6o$1@ID-212844.news.uni-berlin.de>...
Well the #5.2B looks pretty cheap compared to the big dig we have here
in Boston that only cost $16B I think for a similar cross city tunnel.
Still the city will look a lot better afterwards. Thanks to all the US
taxpayers
regards
johnjakson_usa_com
Hi SymonI believe the newer French track laid down for their highspeed is
gently banked and with large turning space, well I've only seen tv
snips in the countryside. I guess in UK (I left 20yrs ago) most of the
track is in densely populated areas, too late to do anything about it.
Perhaps the only place to put any new service would be near/over the
motorway.
regards
johnjakson_usa_com
Hi John,
I heard that the French have a much more 'robust' compulsary purchase scheme
than other countries, i.e. Draw a straight line on the map between Paris to
Lyons and that's where the railway's gonna go! Interesting idea about the
Motorways, here in San Jose I go along Hwy 85 to work, (right past the
Xilinx campus, as it happens, so I'm still on topic ;-)) which is a fairly
new road. There's a light rail system along the central reservation (=Median
for US readers!) for a fair part of the journey. No-one uses it, of course.
No point in owning a Hummer and leaving it at home....
Jonathan's right about economics of new track in the UK. In order to do
anything, you have to tunnel. Check out
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2223468.stm The good thing about this is
that French passengers will now arrive at St.Pancras. If you're French, I
guess that's much better than terminating at Waterloo!
cheers, Syms.
Well the #5.2B looks pretty cheap compared to the big dig we have here
in Boston that only cost $16B I think for a similar cross city tunnel.
Still the city will look a lot better afterwards. Thanks to all the US
taxpayers
regards
johnjakson_usa_com