Toshiba TV29C90 problem; Image fades to black...

[AJ]

FREE!!! LMAO What about the friggin charges metioned when checking your
site out???? LMAO!!!!
"Camron S" <camronstone@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1184924063.135249.270320@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Instantly Turn your Computer into a Super TV

• Watch all your favorite shows on your Computer & TV!
• Channels you can’t get any other place in the U.S.A!
• Watch from anywhere in the world!
• Save 1000's of $$$ over many years on cable and satellite bills
• INSTANT DOWNLOAD
• And much, much more!

For More Details: http://tv-pc.xt.cx

 

[bz]

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:469D2FEF.56F32482@earthlink.net:

UCLAN wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Just forward it to abuse@google.com

Google will do NOTHING! Abuse reports should be sent to his ISP (like
in your case, Earthlink), not the web-based archive he posted from.


Gee! Whooda thunk? I did just that, until dnsstuff.com went pay. I
have reported thousands of spammers to their ISP in the past eight
years.

download a copy of samspade or use their web site.



--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

bz+nanae@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu


--
bz 73 de N5BZ k

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

bz+ser@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap

 

[zeez]

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:00:35 -0500, rapidfire40@earthlink.com wrote:

On 31 Jul 2006 07:20:19 -0700, "Larry Bud" <larrybud2002@yahoo.com
wrote:


Scott en Aztlán wrote:
"Dave" <never@not.invalid> said in misc.consumers:


"nr" <newsreader@midsouth.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1154264626.432744.151220@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Wondering if anyone knows why a non-cordless phone would require
batteries for the caller-ID function to work. Forget about any other
features (time, etc.) Isn't the signal from the phone company enough
to display the incoming call's information?

My guess, so that you can customize the display, and the customization won't
be lost if you move the phone to another jack or disconnect it
omentarily.

A battery backup would only require a small rechargeable cell, or
maybe a watch battery - not 4 AAA's.

I suspect the real reason is that there's not enough current present
on the phone line to power the device until AFTER the phone is taken
off-hook, which of course is too late to actually read the Caller*ID
data. Plus you would be unable to review your calls list, etc.,
without first taking the phone off-hook.

Current doesn't just magically appear when you take the phone off hook.
The way a phone works is that when you talk, the current in the line
fluctuates. This is what carries your voice.

The answer to the OP question is that a telephone is expecting a
certain voltage depending on the on-hook and off-hook state. If you
tried to use the line voltage, it would cause an impedence mismatch and
in effect "short-circuit" the audio, or cause distortion.

There's always current in the lines. I know this because last year I
lost my job and could not pay my electric bill. When they shut off my
power, I just connected a large diode to my phone line. Then I added
a huge capacitor for stability. After the capacitor, I placed a
circuit that caused the DC to be converted to an 60 cycle AC, along
with a voltage regulator. I ran this to my breaker panel and wired it
to the incoming main cables, which no longer went to the power company
because the electric meter was removed. I had lights in the house,
but found they were dim. Measuring the voltage showed I had about 60
volts going into the house wiring. A step up voltage doubler
transformer solved this problem and I ran my entire house from the
phone lines. The one problem I had was that I could not make phone
calls when I ran the electric dryer, range, or air conditioner. I
always had to shut those devices off when I made a phone call.
I also noticed that the retrace lines on my tv set would get harmonics
which fluctuated according to my voice when I talked on the phone and
tried to watch tv at the same time. I just learned to live with that
small annoyance. All of this worked great until I turned on the range
top, range oven, and the air conditioner at the same time. All of a
sudden my phone line overloaded and melted where it connects to the
house. When the phone company came they noticed the heavy load on my
lines and refused to re-connect me until I removed my equipment. I
removed it, they reconnected me, and after they left I hooked it all
up again. I have been more careful since then not to overload the
wiring.

Is this a joke? I doubt there is enough *current* in the line to
barely light a 60 watt light bulb, let alone run a TV set or
an air conditioner! Whe wires are too thin for the high
current needed.

 

[zeez]

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:11:09 -0500, "CRaSH" <sorry@aint-here.spam.com>
wrote:

Billzz wrote:

On the other hand, everyone gets an A+ for creative writing.

April 1st was 4 months ago!

You would be lucky if you could get a 5 black and white TV barely
running with the current supplied by the line.

 

zeez <ultimauw@hotmail.com> wrote:

rapidfire40@earthlink.com wrote:

There's always current in the lines. I know this because last year I
lost my job and could not pay my electric bill. When they shut off my
power, I just connected a large diode to my phone line. Then I added
a huge capacitor for stability. After the capacitor, I placed a
circuit that caused the DC to be converted to an 60 cycle AC, along
with a voltage regulator. I ran this to my breaker panel and wired it
to the incoming main cables, which no longer went to the power company
because the electric meter was removed. I had lights in the house...

Is this a joke?

I suspect so... <10K ohms is "off hook" and 48V^2/10K = 0.23 watts.

Nick

 

[Bert Hyman]

ultimauw@hotmail.com (zeez) wrote in news:46a77dcb.961655@news-
server.ca.rr.com:

Is this a joke?

No. If it was a joke, it would be at least a little funny.

--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert@iphouse.com

 

[Vey]

kaash wrote:

Cell Phone Hack(receive police transmissions) - Video
http://mobilephone-guide.blogspot.com/2007/07/cell-phone-hackreceive-police.html

I tried it and it worked as advertised.

 

[John Tserkezis]

Vey wrote:

kaash wrote:

Cell Phone Hack(receive police transmissions) - Video
http://mobilephone-guide.blogspot.com/2007/07/cell-phone-hackreceive-police.html

I tried it and it worked as advertised.

It should be mentioned the same fix applies for most electronic devices.
It's universal!

--
Linux Registered User # 302622
<http://counter.li.org>

 

[Beloved Leader]

On Jul 26, 8:28 am, kaash <kashifraza....@gmail.com> wrote:

Cell Phone Hack(receive police transmissions) - Videohttp://mobilephone-guide.blogspot.com/2007/07/cell-phone-hackreceive-...

Let me see if I've got this straight:

Fifteen years ago, Billy Tauzin was upset that you could listen to
cellphones on a police scanner. They got rid of that, and the typical
$100 Radio Shack can't listen to cellphones anymore. Now this guy
comes along and tells me how I can use a cellphone to listen to police
calls. Uh, isn't that, like, backwards, or something?

Furthermore, I haven't seen that video, but does it not show someone
using a table knife to work on his cellphone? I mean, is that the
ideal tool for working on surface-mounted devices, or what?

 

[clifto]

Beloved Leader wrote:

Furthermore, I haven't seen that video, but does it not show someone
using a table knife to work on his cellphone? I mean, is that the
ideal tool for working on surface-mounted devices, or what?

Hell, no. 100-watt chisel-point soldering iron, and welding gloves.

--
"Liberals used to be the ones who argued that sending U.S. troops abroad
was a small price to pay to stop genocide; now they argue that genocide
is a small price to pay to bring U.S. troops home."
-- Jonah Goldberg

 

[Brandon D Cartwright]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:35:30 -0700, Spurious Response
<SpuriousResponse@cleansignal.org> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:18:29 -0700, "TicTacTo" <null@void.com> wrote:

I was referrring to your copious posts sent thru anonymous servers.


I told you already, you stupid fucktard!

I NEVER MADE ANY POST FROM ANY SERVER OR TO ANY SERVER OTHER THAN THIS
ONE.

YOU...

F U C K O F F !

You expect folk to simply take the word of a notorious all caps k00k
and documented slanderer and liar?

 

[**THE-RFI-EMI-GUY**]

Is the cheese RoHS compliant?

Vey wrote:

kaash wrote:

Cell Phone Hack(receive police transmissions) - Video
http://mobilephone-guide.blogspot.com/2007/07/cell-phone-hackreceive-police.html



I tried it and it worked as advertised.

--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"Š

"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

"Follow The Money" ;-P

 

[Brandon D Cartwright]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:03:19 -0700, Spurious Response
<SpuriousResponse@cleansignal.org> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:52:09 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
user@example.net> wrote:

How do you filter a troll who changes his fake email and sock puppet
names more often than a whore changes her panties?


If you are such a goddamned Usenet know it all, you should already know
the answer to that.

You don't filter on name, you retarded fuck.

As you insist on posting via aioe.org for example (and I strongly
suspect thru Altopia) that is well nigh impossible if you never know
what server you will post from next.

The bot you use to flood groups is *designed* to make kill filtering
impossible...is it not?

You get a decent news reader, you retarded fuck.

Or, you could just decide to stop harassing me, and go the fuck back
where you spewed from.

Nobody bothered you at all while you were behaving properly.

 

[Spurious Response]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:18:01 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
<user@example.net> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:03:19 -0700, Spurious Response
SpuriousResponse@cleansignal.org> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:52:09 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
user@example.net> wrote:

How do you filter a troll who changes his fake email and sock puppet
names more often than a whore changes her panties?


If you are such a goddamned Usenet know it all, you should already know
the answer to that.

You don't filter on name, you retarded fuck.

As you insist on posting via aioe.org for example (and I strongly
suspect thru Altopia) that is well nigh impossible if you never know
what server you will post from next.

No, you retarded fuck. As I have stated, I have never made a post on
ANY anonymous News service.

The bot you use to flood groups is *designed* to make kill filtering
impossible...is it not?

Sounds to me like you are talking about Alt.Usenet.Kooks practices.
Things like you, and the LameyTard, and the LionelTard do.

I post form COX. that is it, dipshit.

Quite easy to filter. Please do so, if you have enough brains in that
little Circus Flea head of yours.

You get a decent news reader, you retarded fuck.

Or, you could just decide to stop harassing me, and go the fuck back
where you spewed from.

Nobody bothered you at all while you were behaving properly.

You're a goddamned liar, and I can prove it.

As SOON as you noticed my current nym a little over a week ago, you
jacked off at the mouth in a post about it. Within a few hours, the
LameyTard was jacking off into the groups behind you, and "someone" had
already created yet another clone, and made posts elsewhere with it, and
then YOU came strolling back in with one of your "so an so invades
another group" baby bullshit.

You are 100% transparent, you retarded fuck.

 

[Eeyore]

Spurious Response wrote:

You're a goddamned liar, and I can prove it.

As SOON as you noticed my current nym a little over a week ago, you
jacked off at the mouth in a post about it. Within a few hours, the
LameyTard was jacking off into the groups behind you, and "someone" had
already created yet another clone, and made posts elsewhere with it, and
then YOU came strolling back in with one of your "so an so invades
another group" baby bullshit.

You are 100% transparent, you retarded fuck.

Sounds to me like you got your knickers in a twist.

Graham

 

[Brandon D Cartwright]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:30:02 -0700, Spurious Response
<SpuriousResponse@cleansignal.org> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:18:01 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
user@example.net> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:03:19 -0700, Spurious Response
SpuriousResponse@cleansignal.org> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:52:09 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
user@example.net> wrote:

How do you filter a troll who changes his fake email and sock puppet
names more often than a whore changes her panties?


If you are such a goddamned Usenet know it all, you should already know
the answer to that.

You don't filter on name, you retarded fuck.

As you insist on posting via aioe.org for example (and I strongly
suspect thru Altopia) that is well nigh impossible if you never know
what server you will post from next.

No, you retarded fuck. As I have stated, I have never made a post on
ANY anonymous News service.

The bot you use to flood groups is *designed* to make kill filtering
impossible...is it not?

Sounds to me like you are talking about Alt.Usenet.Kooks practices.
Things like you, and the LameyTard, and the LionelTard do.

I post form COX. that is it, dipshit.

Quite easy to filter. Please do so, if you have enough brains in that
little Circus Flea head of yours.

You get a decent news reader, you retarded fuck.

Or, you could just decide to stop harassing me, and go the fuck back
where you spewed from.

Nobody bothered you at all while you were behaving properly.

You're a goddamned liar, and I can prove it.

As SOON as you noticed my current nym a little over a week ago, you
jacked off at the mouth in a post about it.

Nonsense..I have known about your current sock puppet from it's
creation.

Have you forgotten my intermittent posts congratulating you on doing
so well..and reminding you to keep steady?

Within a few hours, the
LameyTard was jacking off into the groups behind you, and "someone" had
already created yet another clone, and made posts elsewhere with it, and
then YOU came strolling back in with one of your "so an so invades
another group" baby bullshit.

Get paranoid much?

You confuse quite natural responses to your abuse and mindless
hostility with plots against you.

You are 100% transparent, you retarded fuck.

What is transparent is your trolling and mental disturbances.

You are more foolish than I thought if you think you can just
stroll into alt.hackers.malicious and trash the group like you have
done with the others.

or are you going to claim someone forged your troll to AHM?

 

[jakdedert]

**THE-RFI-EMI-GUY** wrote:

Is the cheese RoHS compliant?

Vey wrote:

kaash wrote:

Cell Phone Hack(receive police transmissions) - Video
http://mobilephone-guide.blogspot.com/2007/07/cell-phone-hackreceive-police.html



I tried it and it worked as advertised.


Yeah, worked for me also. I tried it on my new iPhone....

jak

 

[Franc Zabkar]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:17:04 GMT, Vey <junker@ericvvey.com> put finger
to keyboard and composed:

kaash wrote:
Cell Phone Hack(receive police transmissions) - Video
http://mobilephone-guide.blogspot.com/2007/07/cell-phone-hackreceive-police.html


I tried it and it worked as advertised.

I would have thought that a non-metallic waste basket would provide
better reception.

BTW, make sure that the butter is *unsalted*.

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.

 

[clifto]

adayattheoffice@gmail.com wrote:

If You Want To Make Money ..This Is What You Do.

Okay, I Am Capitalizing Every Word. When Does The Money Start Pouring In?

--
"Liberals used to be the ones who argued that sending U.S. troops abroad
was a small price to pay to stop genocide; now they argue that genocide
is a small price to pay to bring U.S. troops home."
-- Jonah Goldberg

 

[Samantha Pierce-Harder]

On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:36:23 -0400, Gigolo <Gigolo@msn.com> wrote:

Is this a Lottery group or
it's hijacked by some assholes?

Sadly John Griffin and JackShephard AKA Spurious Response AKA
a hundred sock puppets have destroyed this group