The variable bit cpu

[Skybuck Flying]

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:de0sbc$r4s$3@blue.rahul.net...

In article <de0s6n$9p$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
Skybuck Flying <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
Binary works. Why are you wasting half of your information and
bandwith?

For flexibilitttttyyyyyyyyyyyy ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

They now have plastic semiconductors.

Which are still inflexible at the instruction level ohhhhhhhhhhh =D

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge

 

[keith]

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:22:51 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:

"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.19.04.38.48.738372@att.bizzzz...
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:39:27 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.14.01.13.11.47362@att.bizzzz...
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:38:46 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.12.19.45.50.678755@att.bizzzz...
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:42:05 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:ddbg1s$g1l$2@blue.rahul.net...
In article <ddaakd$iki$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
Skybuck Flying <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:dd8vqf$ru3$1@blue.rahul.net...
In article <4-mdnZUku-xaAWrfRVn-tQ@scnresearch.com>,
Don Taylor <dont@agora.rdrop.com> wrote:
[...]
What I'm trying to get at is whether he has anything more
than
just
an idea about how to have a stream of bits tell you when you
have
reached the end or not.

I think we can save our brains on that one and just assume
that
the
only
idea he has is the end marker idea. He hasn't even realized
what
base
numbering he should use. (hint: base 2 is not the right one)

Boring, it's base 2.

Guess again; the correct answer is obvious and it is not 2.

Base 4 ? get real.

What's wrong with base 4? In grade school we were taught to do
arithmetic
in all bases up to 32 (symbols got the be hard to remember . Are
you
a
crappy coder; a binary bigot?

Why switch from binary to base 4.

Why not, if there is an advantage? OTOH, why encode in base four and
throw away half of your information?

It doesn't matter. The data bits and data marker bits can be detected
in
binary just fine

You *still* haven't a clue.

Are you going to say what base you think is suited lol ?

No, I'm saying that you haven't a clue. Hint: You're wasting half your
information in flags. Some information is necessarily lost in such
schemes, but it need not be half. You have two bits for every bit of
data. That's rather poor. An idiot could improve that by 50%.

You're such a fucking idiot. This isn't about compression. Go see a doctor
yourself.

Only an idiot throws away bandwidth. Since that's all you've done here
for weeks...

Dipshit.

You claim so much yet you provide noooo answers how convenient.

The answers are more plain than the chip on your shoulder. Now run along,
kid.

--
Keith

 

[keith]

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:30:16 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:

"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.19.04.39.58.930368@att.bizzzz...
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:38:46 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.14.01.14.18.776751@att.bizzzz...
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:39:26 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:ddjk7a$89s$3@blue.rahul.net...
In article <ddi1q1$g5v$1@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
Skybuck Flying <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
[....]
idea he has is the end marker idea. He hasn't even realized
what
base
numbering he should use. (hint: base 2 is not the right one)

Boring, it's base 2.

Guess again; the correct answer is obvious and it is not 2.

Base 4 ? get real.

No. Four is the wrong answer. The right answer is obvious.

Not to me, I give up, what's the right answer according to you, which
is
ofcourse wrong anyway since binary is perfectly suited to detect the
data
bits and marker bits

Binary works. Why are you wasting half of your information and
bandwith?

For flexibilitttttyyyyyyyyyyyy ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

See your doctor. Viagra might help.

Wax your dick, so it fits better into your donkey's ass lol. hahahaha

Why would I want to get my dick anywhere near you? I must say, you do

have your fantasies!

--
Keith

 

[Skybuck Flying]

"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.23.02.27.08.566192@att.bizzzz...

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:30:16 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.19.04.39.58.930368@att.bizzzz...
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:38:46 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.14.01.14.18.776751@att.bizzzz...
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:39:26 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:ddjk7a$89s$3@blue.rahul.net...
In article <ddi1q1$g5v$1@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
Skybuck Flying <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
[....]
idea he has is the end marker idea. He hasn't even
realized
what
base
numbering he should use. (hint: base 2 is not the right
one)

Boring, it's base 2.

Guess again; the correct answer is obvious and it is not 2.

Base 4 ? get real.

No. Four is the wrong answer. The right answer is obvious.

Not to me, I give up, what's the right answer according to you,
which
is
ofcourse wrong anyway since binary is perfectly suited to detect
the
data
bits and marker bits

Binary works. Why are you wasting half of your information and
bandwith?

For flexibilitttttyyyyyyyyyyyy ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

See your doctor. Viagra might help.

Wax your dick, so it fits better into your donkey's ass lol. hahahaha

Why would I want to get my dick anywhere near you? I must say, you do
have your fantasies!

Cause you're a donkey fucker lol.

 

[Skybuck Flying]

"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.23.02.24.30.435301@att.bizzzz...

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:22:51 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.19.04.38.48.738372@att.bizzzz...
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:39:27 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.14.01.13.11.47362@att.bizzzz...
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:38:46 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.12.19.45.50.678755@att.bizzzz...
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:42:05 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:ddbg1s$g1l$2@blue.rahul.net...
In article <ddaakd$iki$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
Skybuck Flying <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:

"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:dd8vqf$ru3$1@blue.rahul.net...
In article <4-mdnZUku-xaAWrfRVn-tQ@scnresearch.com>,
Don Taylor <dont@agora.rdrop.com> wrote:
[...]
What I'm trying to get at is whether he has anything more
than
just
an idea about how to have a stream of bits tell you when
you
have
reached the end or not.

I think we can save our brains on that one and just assume
that
the
only
idea he has is the end marker idea. He hasn't even
realized
what
base
numbering he should use. (hint: base 2 is not the right
one)

Boring, it's base 2.

Guess again; the correct answer is obvious and it is not 2.

Base 4 ? get real.

What's wrong with base 4? In grade school we were taught to do
arithmetic
in all bases up to 32 (symbols got the be hard to remember .
Are
you
a
crappy coder; a binary bigot?

Why switch from binary to base 4.

Why not, if there is an advantage? OTOH, why encode in base four
and
throw away half of your information?

It doesn't matter. The data bits and data marker bits can be
detected
in
binary just fine

You *still* haven't a clue.

Are you going to say what base you think is suited lol ?

No, I'm saying that you haven't a clue. Hint: You're wasting half
your
information in flags. Some information is necessarily lost in such
schemes, but it need not be half. You have two bits for every bit of
data. That's rather poor. An idiot could improve that by 50%.

You're such a fucking idiot. This isn't about compression. Go see a
doctor
yourself.

Only an idiot throws away bandwidth. Since that's all you've done here
for weeks...

I got bandwidth plenty

Dipshit.

You claim so much yet you provide noooo answers how convenient.

The answers are more plain than the chip on your shoulder. Now run along,
kid.

? blablablabla ?

--
Keith

 

[keith]

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:35:43 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:

"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.23.02.27.08.566192@att.bizzzz...
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:30:16 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.19.04.39.58.930368@att.bizzzz...
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:38:46 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.14.01.14.18.776751@att.bizzzz...
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:39:26 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:ddjk7a$89s$3@blue.rahul.net...
In article <ddi1q1$g5v$1@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
Skybuck Flying <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
[....]
idea he has is the end marker idea. He hasn't even
realized
what
base
numbering he should use. (hint: base 2 is not the right
one)

Boring, it's base 2.

Guess again; the correct answer is obvious and it is not 2.

Base 4 ? get real.

No. Four is the wrong answer. The right answer is obvious.

Not to me, I give up, what's the right answer according to you,
which
is
ofcourse wrong anyway since binary is perfectly suited to detect
the
data
bits and marker bits

Binary works. Why are you wasting half of your information and
bandwith?

For flexibilitttttyyyyyyyyyyyy ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

See your doctor. Viagra might help.

Wax your dick, so it fits better into your donkey's ass lol. hahahaha

Why would I want to get my dick anywhere near you? I must say, you do
have your fantasies!

Cause you're a donkey fucker lol.

Hmm, so you _do_ fantasize about me fucking you. Sorry, I'm married and
wouldn't do beastiality in any case.

--
Keith

 

[Skybuck Flying]

"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.25.01.24.24.567557@att.bizzzz...

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:35:43 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.23.02.27.08.566192@att.bizzzz...
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:30:16 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.19.04.39.58.930368@att.bizzzz...
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:38:46 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
newsan.2005.08.14.01.14.18.776751@att.bizzzz...
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 22:39:26 +0200, Skybuck Flying wrote:


"Ken Smith" <kensmith@green.rahul.net> wrote in message
news:ddjk7a$89s$3@blue.rahul.net...
In article <ddi1q1$g5v$1@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
Skybuck Flying <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
[....]
idea he has is the end marker idea. He hasn't even
realized
what
base
numbering he should use. (hint: base 2 is not the right
one)

Boring, it's base 2.

Guess again; the correct answer is obvious and it is not 2.

Base 4 ? get real.

No. Four is the wrong answer. The right answer is obvious.

Not to me, I give up, what's the right answer according to you,
which
is
ofcourse wrong anyway since binary is perfectly suited to
detect
the
data
bits and marker bits

Binary works. Why are you wasting half of your information and
bandwith?

For flexibilitttttyyyyyyyyyyyy ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

See your doctor. Viagra might help.

Wax your dick, so it fits better into your donkey's ass lol. hahahaha

Why would I want to get my dick anywhere near you? I must say, you do
have your fantasies!

Cause you're a donkey fucker lol.

Hmm, so you _do_ fantasize about me fucking you. Sorry, I'm married and
wouldn't do beastiality in any case.

Yes you are a donkey and you married to a donkey too lol hahaha.

--
Keith

 

[Pooh Bear]

Skybuck Flying wrote:

Yes you are a donkey and you married to a donkey too lol hahaha.

Are you still hanging on here like the proverbial bad penny ?

Graham

 

[keith]

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:28:56 +0100, Pooh Bear wrote:

Skybuck Flying wrote:

Yes you are a donkey and you married to a donkey too lol hahaha.

Are you still hanging on here like the proverbial bad penny ?

What do you want from a kid who's parent's have more money than sense?

--
Keith