Guest
Ricky C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:0615dc3d-3e9c-402e-8bef-9517c2f3c31c@googlegroups.com:
We have a hard time purging things like despotic, dictatorial
crackpots, but otherwise look out for folks pretty well.
If ALL of CD were still in place, THEY would have handled this
pandemic response, and would NOT have called the threat minimal.
And then went golfing.
But it has nothing to do with the radio they have installed.
Grasping at straws? That is a laugh. Every "radio" in cars these
days are already emissions approved, third party supply chain
acquisistions.
You are mumbling. High wattage brushless motors have age issues
too, and they and their drive circuits experience age related
"additional emissions" in some of those circumstances.
> I guess the FM radio LO might emit a bit.
Yo are way too far in to it. Car radios are already approved third
party devices. Car makers do NOT have to get their car re-evaluated
for rule part 15 compliance every time they choose a new radio. It's
called COTS.
And these days, there is very little part 15 compliance police out
there looking at everything since mothing has been greatly emissive
since they took away the computer case shileding specs years ago.
If a zinged out motherboard can keep it down, the FCC pretty much
presumes everything else can and does as well. So they wait. You
file a complaint on a device, and THEN they go give it a look.
The MAKER has to declare compliance, and *should* actually be
providing it. But not necc so and not always the case, and unless
and until an rf noise emissions complaint would get filed on a
device, they ain't looking any more.
Now you are back on track. First ask them how they voted. That
should give you a quick, which side of the bell curve they fall on
feel.
I want Musk to help me buil my city.
Remember how hated Bill Gates was? Idiots despise successful
business persons. That is one way you can tell without asking them
how they voted. They claim to love America, but hate Americans that
have made it.
Look at all the derision cast upon Bloomberg.
That guy made part of this nation for decades, just like Perot did.
Larkin hates NASA. That is the third method. They claim to be so
intelligent, yet deride known hard science.
The guy isn't really even all that eccentric. I like him because
hes MUST have a lot of intelligence. I mean come on, people. The
guy is brilliant.
And a quasar compared to the little brown dwarf that Trump's
"Brilliance level" hovers at. (or is it orange).
He likely has all three attributes.
news:0615dc3d-3e9c-402e-8bef-9517c2f3c31c@googlegroups.com:
On Tuesday, April 28, 2020 at 1:03:34 PM UTC-4, Michael Terrell
wrote:
On Tuesday, April 28, 2020 at 12:31:38 AM UTC-4, David Lesher
wrote:
Michael Terrell writes:
Prior to the pig being replaced, the only time I could use
AM was d
uring=
power outages, or after a hurricane. It wasn't dirty
insulators, sinc
e it =
was the same before, during and after rain.
And not when a Tesla drives by. Teslas do not have AM band on
their radios. You can guess why....
Poor design of the motor controls and little or no shielding?
A decent
AM radio design was more complex than all of the electronics in a
Tesla?
Demographics. Tesla really isn't targeting the market that
includes many AM listeners. I can't remember the last time I
listened to AM radio in any venue.
Believe it or not, civil defense still exists.
We have a hard time purging things like despotic, dictatorial
crackpots, but otherwise look out for folks pretty well.
If ALL of CD were still in place, THEY would have handled this
pandemic response, and would NOT have called the threat minimal.
And then went golfing.
Cars have to meet part 15 emission standards like any other
device.
But it has nothing to do with the radio they have installed.
Grasping at straws? That is a laugh. Every "radio" in cars these
days are already emissions approved, third party supply chain
acquisistions.
Unlike ICE, electric batteries and motors don't have wear
parts in the electrical path that degrade and generate emissions.
You are mumbling. High wattage brushless motors have age issues
too, and they and their drive circuits experience age related
"additional emissions" in some of those circumstances.
> I guess the FM radio LO might emit a bit.
Yo are way too far in to it. Car radios are already approved third
party devices. Car makers do NOT have to get their car re-evaluated
for rule part 15 compliance every time they choose a new radio. It's
called COTS.
And these days, there is very little part 15 compliance police out
there looking at everything since mothing has been greatly emissive
since they took away the computer case shileding specs years ago.
If a zinged out motherboard can keep it down, the FCC pretty much
presumes everything else can and does as well. So they wait. You
file a complaint on a device, and THEN they go give it a look.
The MAKER has to declare compliance, and *should* actually be
providing it. But not necc so and not always the case, and unless
and until an rf noise emissions complaint would get filed on a
device, they ain't looking any more.
I've never understood why people would hate an entire car company
when they've never owned a product.
Now you are back on track. First ask them how they voted. That
should give you a quick, which side of the bell curve they fall on
feel.
Is it the idea of doing
something that other companies said wasn't practical?
I want Musk to help me buil my city.
Is it the
idea of the cars themselves?
Remember how hated Bill Gates was? Idiots despise successful
business persons. That is one way you can tell without asking them
how they voted. They claim to love America, but hate Americans that
have made it.
Look at all the derision cast upon Bloomberg.
That guy made part of this nation for decades, just like Perot did.
Larkin hates NASA. That is the third method. They claim to be so
intelligent, yet deride known hard science.
Tesla hate just seems so totally
irrational to me.
The guy isn't really even all that eccentric. I like him because
hes MUST have a lot of intelligence. I mean come on, people. The
guy is brilliant.
And a quasar compared to the little brown dwarf that Trump's
"Brilliance level" hovers at. (or is it orange).
That's why I understand Larkin hating them.
I just read this, and look what I already wrote above.
He likely has all three attributes.