Guest
On Tuesday, July 9, 2019 at 7:49:25 PM UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
LOL NOW THE MONKEY COMES OUT OF THE SLEAVE !
YOU JUST JEALOUS OUT MY 55 TB DICK CONSUMPTION !
YOU SUCH A TINY LITTLE DATA USER ! LOL.
HAHAHAHAHA.
Bye,
Skybuck.
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:m5e9ie1usotoptp4n4hbp9bisb1ufgb10n@4ax.com:
Why not use an ethernet router?
No shit.
You will likely need a lot of ports.
Zero known facts blather.
I'd expect that a PC with a lot of ports will be a very inefficient
router.
no shit. Not optimized. Still not incapable for some dope's home
network.
The 55TB claim is what is lame. 55TB of WHAT?
It is probably all porn.
I have 300 hi res movies and at an avg of 2 -4 GB each, they do not
even come close to that much.
He must have ripped off the film industry grabbing 35GB copies of
movies ripped from bluray dvds. Some are even bigger than that.
The boy is a true idiot.
Top scientists do not have or need 55TB at home storage.
LOL NOW THE MONKEY COMES OUT OF THE SLEAVE !
YOU JUST JEALOUS OUT MY 55 TB DICK CONSUMPTION !
YOU SUCH A TINY LITTLE DATA USER ! LOL.
HAHAHAHAHA.
Bye,
Skybuck.