Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 14:06:23 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 1:35:53?PM UTC-4, Eddy Lee wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 8:24:59?AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 11:55:14?PM UTC-4, Eddy Lee wrote:
Can I use this for 220V input and 380V output?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/255681909221
This should give me around 400V to 450V full bridge rectified DC.
You\'ll never know from that fantasy, fake advertisement. What is the load you\'re putting on the 400-450 VDC in Amps?
0.5A to 2A. I can put in multiple 100W Ts.
The foregoing was meant to show that a 60 Hz magnetics approach is kinda absurd.
Buy a high efficiency switcher.
High voltage output switchers are rare.
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 5:35:56?PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 14:06:23 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 1:35:53?PM UTC-4, Eddy Lee wrote:
On Saturday, July 1, 2023 at 8:24:59?AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 11:55:14?PM UTC-4, Eddy Lee wrote:
Can I use this for 220V input and 380V output?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/255681909221
This should give me around 400V to 450V full bridge rectified DC.
You\'ll never know from that fantasy, fake advertisement. What is the load you\'re putting on the 400-450 VDC in Amps?
0.5A to 2A. I can put in multiple 100W Ts.
The foregoing was meant to show that a 60 Hz magnetics approach is kinda absurd.
Buy a high efficiency switcher.
High voltage output switchers are rare.
Not anymore. China makes them a commodity:
https://idealplusing.en.made-in-china.com/product/EdjGBQbxgzkH/China-Hot-Sale-220V-110V-AC-to-400V-500V-600V-700V-DC-1000W-Switching-Power-Supply.html
Pointless to read the specs, but it sounds right.
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 05:07:53 -0700 (PDT), Eddy Lee
eddy711lee@gmail.com> wrote:
47uF 400V cap.
If you feed the 220/380 V transformer with something that even
remotely looks like 220 Vrms and rectify the output with a bridge
rectifier, the idle (no load) voltage will be the peak voltage or
about 530 V.
I would suggest using a capacitor rated for 600 V.
Eddy Lee
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
John Larkin wrote:
----------------------------
Eddy Lee
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
...... Phil
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 19:32:12 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
----------------------------
Eddy Lee
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
...... Phil
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
John Larkin wrote:
------------------------------
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
upsidedown@downunder.com wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 05:07:53 -0700 (PDT), Eddy Lee
eddy711lee@gmail.com> wrote:
47uF 400V cap.
If you feed the 220/380 V transformer with something that even
remotely looks like 220 Vrms and rectify the output with a bridge
rectifier, the idle (no load) voltage will be the peak voltage or
about 530 V.
I would suggest using a capacitor rated for 600 V.
That hardly provides any margin.
Use two 450 volt caps in series with equalizing resistors in parallel.
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
John Larkin wrote:
------------------------------
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
** But real transformers are not so simple.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
** JL has such simple faith in overly simple models.
I wonder why ?
John Larkin wrote:
------------------------------
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the
secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the
full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
** But real transformers are not so simple.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
** JL has such simple faith in overly simple models.
I wonder why ?
...... Phil
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
palli...@gmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
------------------------------
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time..
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
** But real transformers are not so simple.
The Spice model of a transformer is simple: each winding has ESR,
there\'s magnetizing inductance, and there\'s leakage inductance. Ignore
capacitances at line frequencies.
Given a Spice model, you can run it in either direction, with
resistive or diode loads or whatever, and Spice will tell you
everything you need to know. The only gotcha it misses is core
saturation.
I had to take TWO semisters of Electrical Machinery at Tulane, which
was a huge nuisance, but I did learn about the circuit equivalent of a
transformer, which was almost worth the hassle.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
** JL has such simple faith in overly simple models.
I wonder why ?
I design things that work, and verify by experiment if there\'s any
doubt. And the transformer model IS simple.
One thing that\'s often worth verifying is temperature rise, with
actual mounting and air flow. Transformer vendors are vague and the
thermals are hard to math out. [1]
If you are concerned about reversing a transformer, just try it.
[1] the affect of air flow and duty cycle on parts is rarely
mentioned.
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 7:39:31â¯AM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
palli...@gmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
------------------------------
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
** But real transformers are not so simple.
The Spice model of a transformer is simple: each winding has ESR,
there\'s magnetizing inductance, and there\'s leakage inductance. Ignore
capacitances at line frequencies.
Given a Spice model, you can run it in either direction, with
resistive or diode loads or whatever, and Spice will tell you
everything you need to know. The only gotcha it misses is core
saturation.
I had to take TWO semisters of Electrical Machinery at Tulane, which
was a huge nuisance, but I did learn about the circuit equivalent of a
transformer, which was almost worth the hassle.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
** JL has such simple faith in overly simple models.
I wonder why ?
I design things that work, and verify by experiment if there\'s any
doubt. And the transformer model IS simple.
One thing that\'s often worth verifying is temperature rise, with
actual mounting and air flow. Transformer vendors are vague and the
thermals are hard to math out. [1]
If you are concerned about reversing a transformer, just try it.
[1] the affect of air flow and duty cycle on parts is rarely
mentioned.
There\'s nothing to justify the hysteria about reversing the power flow in a transformer. Unless it can be shown that something about transformer operation is compromised by the direction of power flow. There is no such effect.
A very safe bet is taking one of those 220:120 transformers and wiring as autotransformer with secondary aiding. That gives him the 340 V,RMS required for a 450 VDC supply. He can double insulate his hot side load. The only problem is size and expense of transformer required. I don\'t think it\'s going to compete with that 7 lb weight Chinese switcher.
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 11:00:17â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 7:39:31â¯AM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
palli...@gmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
------------------------------
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
** But real transformers are not so simple.
The Spice model of a transformer is simple: each winding has ESR,
there\'s magnetizing inductance, and there\'s leakage inductance. Ignore
capacitances at line frequencies.
Given a Spice model, you can run it in either direction, with
resistive or diode loads or whatever, and Spice will tell you
everything you need to know. The only gotcha it misses is core
saturation.
I had to take TWO semisters of Electrical Machinery at Tulane, which
was a huge nuisance, but I did learn about the circuit equivalent of a
transformer, which was almost worth the hassle.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
** JL has such simple faith in overly simple models.
I wonder why ?
I design things that work, and verify by experiment if there\'s any
doubt. And the transformer model IS simple.
One thing that\'s often worth verifying is temperature rise, with
actual mounting and air flow. Transformer vendors are vague and the
thermals are hard to math out. [1]
If you are concerned about reversing a transformer, just try it.
[1] the affect of air flow and duty cycle on parts is rarely
mentioned.
There\'s nothing to justify the hysteria about reversing the power flow in a transformer. Unless it can be shown that something about transformer operation is compromised by the direction of power flow. There is no such effect.
A very safe bet is taking one of those 220:120 transformers and wiring as autotransformer with secondary aiding. That gives him the 340 V,RMS required for a 450 VDC supply. He can double insulate his hot side load. The only problem is size and expense of transformer required. I don\'t think it\'s going to compete with that 7 lb weight Chinese switcher.
From my measurement of 250V DC (around 12% higher) out of 220V DC. 340V AC would only give around 384V DC. 429V DC out of 380V AC would be better.
Alternatively, I am going to try a 24 to 380 reverse transformer. It might be easier to adjust input between 20V to 24V.
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 3:07:52â¯PM UTC-4, Eddy Lee wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 11:00:17â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 7:39:31â¯AM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
palli...@gmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
------------------------------
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
** But real transformers are not so simple.
The Spice model of a transformer is simple: each winding has ESR,
there\'s magnetizing inductance, and there\'s leakage inductance. Ignore
capacitances at line frequencies.
Given a Spice model, you can run it in either direction, with
resistive or diode loads or whatever, and Spice will tell you
everything you need to know. The only gotcha it misses is core
saturation.
I had to take TWO semisters of Electrical Machinery at Tulane, which
was a huge nuisance, but I did learn about the circuit equivalent of a
transformer, which was almost worth the hassle.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
** JL has such simple faith in overly simple models.
I wonder why ?
I design things that work, and verify by experiment if there\'s any
doubt. And the transformer model IS simple.
One thing that\'s often worth verifying is temperature rise, with
actual mounting and air flow. Transformer vendors are vague and the
thermals are hard to math out. [1]
If you are concerned about reversing a transformer, just try it.
[1] the affect of air flow and duty cycle on parts is rarely
mentioned.
There\'s nothing to justify the hysteria about reversing the power flow in a transformer. Unless it can be shown that something about transformer operation is compromised by the direction of power flow. There is no such effect.
A very safe bet is taking one of those 220:120 transformers and wiring as autotransformer with secondary aiding. That gives him the 340 V,RMS required for a 450 VDC supply. He can double insulate his hot side load. The only problem is size and expense of transformer required. I don\'t think it\'s going to compete with that 7 lb weight Chinese switcher.
From my measurement of 250V DC (around 12% higher) out of 220V AC. 340V AC would only give around 384V DC. 429V DC out of 380V AC would be better.
You can\'t trust a general purpose multimeter to make reliable measurements of those broken waveforms. The 340 VAC has a peak of 340 x SQRT(2)= 480 Vpk. Full wave rectified and capacitor filtered should give you 450 VDC.
Alternatively, I am going to try a 24 to 380 reverse transformer. It might be e.
asier to adjust input between 20V to 24V.
If you have that transformer on hand, go for it, it should work just fine.. That lower primary voltage gives you the opportunity to AC regulate the output with cheaper and more readily available parts too. Watch your HV filter cap selection.
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 12:26:54â¯PM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 3:07:52â¯PM UTC-4, Eddy Lee wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 11:00:17â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 7:39:31â¯AM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
palli...@gmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
------------------------------
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
** But real transformers are not so simple.
The Spice model of a transformer is simple: each winding has ESR,
there\'s magnetizing inductance, and there\'s leakage inductance. Ignore
capacitances at line frequencies.
Given a Spice model, you can run it in either direction, with
resistive or diode loads or whatever, and Spice will tell you
everything you need to know. The only gotcha it misses is core
saturation.
I had to take TWO semisters of Electrical Machinery at Tulane, which
was a huge nuisance, but I did learn about the circuit equivalent of a
transformer, which was almost worth the hassle.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
** JL has such simple faith in overly simple models.
I wonder why ?
I design things that work, and verify by experiment if there\'s any
doubt. And the transformer model IS simple.
One thing that\'s often worth verifying is temperature rise, with
actual mounting and air flow. Transformer vendors are vague and the
thermals are hard to math out. [1]
If you are concerned about reversing a transformer, just try it.
[1] the affect of air flow and duty cycle on parts is rarely
mentioned.
There\'s nothing to justify the hysteria about reversing the power flow in a transformer. Unless it can be shown that something about transformer operation is compromised by the direction of power flow. There is no such effect.
A very safe bet is taking one of those 220:120 transformers and wiring as autotransformer with secondary aiding. That gives him the 340 V,RMS required for a 450 VDC supply. He can double insulate his hot side load. The only problem is size and expense of transformer required. I don\'t think it\'s going to compete with that 7 lb weight Chinese switcher.
From my measurement of 250V DC (around 12% higher) out of 220V AC. 340V AC would only give around 384V DC. 429V DC out of 380V AC would be better.
You can\'t trust a general purpose multimeter to make reliable measurements of those broken waveforms. The 340 VAC has a peak of 340 x SQRT(2)= 480 Vpk. Full wave rectified and capacitor filtered should give you 450 VDC.
Full bridge rectifier and 82uF 450V capacitor. Steady reading of 350V DC. I can try out a different inverter.
I got 170V DC if i connect my rectifier to the 110V outlet. So, i am sure the circuit is working fine.
Alternatively, I am going to try a 24 to 380 reverse transformer. It might be e.
asier to adjust input between 20V to 24V.
If you have that transformer on hand, go for it, it should work just fine. That lower primary voltage gives you the opportunity to AC regulate the output with cheaper and more readily available parts too. Watch your HV filter cap selection.
Ordered a 10W version to test. Will get the 100W version if it works.
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 12:46:04â¯PM UTC-7, Eddy Lee wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 12:26:54â¯PM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 3:07:52â¯PM UTC-4, Eddy Lee wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 11:00:17â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 7:39:31â¯AM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
palli...@gmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
------------------------------
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
** But real transformers are not so simple.
The Spice model of a transformer is simple: each winding has ESR,
there\'s magnetizing inductance, and there\'s leakage inductance. Ignore
capacitances at line frequencies.
Given a Spice model, you can run it in either direction, with
resistive or diode loads or whatever, and Spice will tell you
everything you need to know. The only gotcha it misses is core
saturation.
I had to take TWO semisters of Electrical Machinery at Tulane, which
was a huge nuisance, but I did learn about the circuit equivalent of a
transformer, which was almost worth the hassle.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
** JL has such simple faith in overly simple models.
I wonder why ?
I design things that work, and verify by experiment if there\'s any
doubt. And the transformer model IS simple.
One thing that\'s often worth verifying is temperature rise, with
actual mounting and air flow. Transformer vendors are vague and the
thermals are hard to math out. [1]
If you are concerned about reversing a transformer, just try it..
[1] the affect of air flow and duty cycle on parts is rarely
mentioned.
There\'s nothing to justify the hysteria about reversing the power flow in a transformer. Unless it can be shown that something about transformer operation is compromised by the direction of power flow. There is no such effect.
A very safe bet is taking one of those 220:120 transformers and wiring as autotransformer with secondary aiding. That gives him the 340 V,RMS required for a 450 VDC supply. He can double insulate his hot side load. The only problem is size and expense of transformer required. I don\'t think it\'s going to compete with that 7 lb weight Chinese switcher.
From my measurement of 250V DC (around 12% higher) out of 220V AC. 340V AC would only give around 384V DC. 429V DC out of 380V AC would be better.
You can\'t trust a general purpose multimeter to make reliable measurements of those broken waveforms. The 340 VAC has a peak of 340 x SQRT(2)= 480 Vpk. Full wave rectified and capacitor filtered should give you 450 VDC.
Full bridge rectifier and 82uF 450V capacitor. Steady reading of 250V DC. I can try out a different inverter.
I got 170V DC if i connect my rectifier to the 110V outlet. So, i am sure the circuit is working fine.
Alternatively, I am going to try a 24 to 380 reverse transformer. It might be easier to adjust input between 20V to 24V.
If you have that transformer on hand, go for it, it should work just fine. That lower primary voltage gives you the opportunity to AC regulate the output with cheaper and more readily available parts too. Watch your HV filter cap selection.
Ordered a 10W version to test. Will get the 100W version if it works.
Correction: 450V DC to 350V DC.
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 12:51:41â¯PM UTC-7, Eddy Lee wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 12:46:04â¯PM UTC-7, Eddy Lee wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 12:26:54â¯PM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 3:07:52â¯PM UTC-4, Eddy Lee wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 11:00:17â¯AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 7:39:31â¯AM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
palli...@gmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
------------------------------
Question is whether they are symmetrical from either side (primary/secondary) in efficiency and load capacity.
I will be driving it from both sides, but not at the same time.
Sure, a transformer works either way.
** But makers nominate the primary and secondary for good reasons.
The primary supplies the magnetising current, which can be significant, plus is wound to allow for voltage drop at the secondary under full load. If the roles are swapped, there are several changes that can catch the unwary.
Any winding can magnetize the core. The primary is the one you decide
to put power into and the secondary is the one you elect to take power
out of.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
** But real transformers are not so simple.
The Spice model of a transformer is simple: each winding has ESR,
there\'s magnetizing inductance, and there\'s leakage inductance. Ignore
capacitances at line frequencies.
Given a Spice model, you can run it in either direction, with
resistive or diode loads or whatever, and Spice will tell you
everything you need to know. The only gotcha it misses is core
saturation.
I had to take TWO semisters of Electrical Machinery at Tulane, which
was a huge nuisance, but I did learn about the circuit equivalent of a
transformer, which was almost worth the hassle.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
** JL has such simple faith in overly simple models.
I wonder why ?
I design things that work, and verify by experiment if there\'s any
doubt. And the transformer model IS simple.
One thing that\'s often worth verifying is temperature rise, with
actual mounting and air flow. Transformer vendors are vague and the
thermals are hard to math out. [1]
If you are concerned about reversing a transformer, just try it.
[1] the affect of air flow and duty cycle on parts is rarely
mentioned.
There\'s nothing to justify the hysteria about reversing the power flow in a transformer. Unless it can be shown that something about transformer operation is compromised by the direction of power flow. There is no such effect.
A very safe bet is taking one of those 220:120 transformers and wiring as autotransformer with secondary aiding. That gives him the 340 V,RMS required for a 450 VDC supply. He can double insulate his hot side load.. The only problem is size and expense of transformer required. I don\'t think it\'s going to compete with that 7 lb weight Chinese switcher.
From my measurement of 250V DC (around 12% higher) out of 220V AC.. 340V AC would only give around 384V DC. 429V DC out of 380V AC would be better.
You can\'t trust a general purpose multimeter to make reliable measurements of those broken waveforms. The 340 VAC has a peak of 340 x SQRT(2)= 480 Vpk. Full wave rectified and capacitor filtered should give you 450 VDC.
Full bridge rectifier and 82uF 450V capacitor. Steady reading of 250V DC. I can try out a different inverter.
I got 170V DC if i connect my rectifier to the 110V outlet. So, i am sure the circuit is working fine.
Alternatively, I am going to try a 24 to 380 reverse transformer. It might be easier to adjust input between 20V to 24V.
If you have that transformer on hand, go for it, it should work just fine. That lower primary voltage gives you the opportunity to AC regulate the output with cheaper and more readily available parts too. Watch your HV filter cap selection.
Ordered a 10W version to test. Will get the 100W version if it works.
Correction: 450V DC to 350V DC.
Correction again: measured 250V DC out of 220V AC inverter.
250V DC (from inverter) + 170V (from wall) would be perfect. But the wall is not always available.
** The maker tells you which is which because they have adjusted the windings ( number of turns and wire gauges) accordingly.
2-winding power transformers are usually designed for equal copper
loss on both windings. So are thermally symmetric.
Sometimes some windings are insulated better than others.
What other catches might there be?
** As I mentioned, which winding carries the I mag plus the turns ratio have been adjusted by makers to compensate for the full load voltage drop. Reverse the makers intended roles and those built in compensations operate in the opposite directions.
That\'s easy to think through. Power transformer models are simple and
easy to reverse.
** But real transformers are not so simple.
Given a Spice model, you can run it in either direction, with
resistive or diode loads or whatever, and Spice will tell you
everything you need to know. The only gotcha it misses is core
saturation.
You may have to seriously de-rate the transformer in order to use it that way,
mains frequency transformers under 100VA are the most affected.
A 100 VA transformer is happy moving 100 VA in either direction.
** JL has such simple faith in overly simple models.
I wonder why ?
If you are concerned about reversing a transformer, just try it.