J
Joerg
Guest
John Larkin wrote:
Might be an option, I'll have to think that through. The sweep time is
several hundred times the sampling window and can be made constant.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:53:59 -0800, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:02:08 +1100, Chris Jones <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com
wrote:
On 07/02/2014 15:32, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:32:17 -0800, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 07:55:31 -0800, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 01:08:51 -0500, "Tom Miller" <tmiller11147@verizon.net
wrote:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:h496f9lnspapejoj41btps9ebihu2qnk52@4ax.com...
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:01:54 -0800, Joerg <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Folks,
Need to sample stuff again. Essentially an equivalent time deal like on
older generation digital scopes where you have a 20MHz or so ADC and
GHZ-bandwidth on the scope. Can take as long as it has to but ... the
sampling must be accurate and the sample gate should ideally close and
open in a few hundred picosends, 1nsec at the most. So far I've always
done this stuff in discretes, diode quads, brute-force driver, the
usual. But this gets old and now I need something small and cheap.
Aren't there any ICs in that domain or am I the only one with such
desires?
Also looking for a timer chip to run this but that's easier.
Some ADCs have screaming fast multi-GHz front-end s/h speeds, intended for
sub-Nyquist sampling of RF stuff. 1 ns isn't especially fast in that
world.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
For $10 ? Put me down for one.
Tom
AD9204-20 has 700 MHz s/h bw, maybe 500 ps, $5.
But when looking at the fine print in here ...
http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/AD9204.pdf
... it says quote "The user can sample any fs/2 frequency segment from
dc to 200 MHz". Something doesn't seem to compute with the data on page
7 where the fastest version (AD9204-80) still requires 6.25nsec high
phase for the clock. The -20 is 25nsec. How can they do 625MHz with that?
The data sheet is a tad ambiguous about what that 700 MHz thing means.
The min clock pulse width kind of gives it away. I don't think the
sampler could possible be fast enough with that. It'll integrate over
many nsec and that totally spoils the soup here.
I'll put you down for two.
Do you know any cheap one that's faster? I sure wish that instead of all
the no-connect pins they'd pipe out the analog output of the S&H so
people could use it sans the ADC section.
The s/h may not actually exist as such inside.
That could be a problem unless there is a true flash ADC inside.
Do you need a s/h alone, or could you use an adc with a fast s/h inside? There
are probably more ads with fast front ends... I just nabbed that one as an
example.
I don't quite understand the application.
This one I really can't talk about but essentially I need to be able to
digitize a very high frequency event in an equivalent time fashion, like
on old DSOs. Or very fast new ones. A very fast ADC is far from ideal
here but could work if nothing else is there. And it seems there ain't.
Could you use a diode mixer and a narrow pulse generator? That could be cheap.
Yes, but diodes still have almost a pF when operated as quads, even the
fancy Skyworks ones. Too much leakage when off. The only way to make
that work would be a slew of T-configuration sections. Gets big and
expensive. In an IC that would be easy to do but there seems to be not
enough market. There are some boutique chips but those cost hundreds of
Dollars.
There is the 1-bit sampler thing, namely using a d-flop as an equivalent-time
sampler, sort of a tracking ADC. It takes a lot of samples to build the
waveform, but it's potentially cheap. A differential-input D flop, like an
EL/EP52, can do that.
Yes, well I had always thought of doing it with a clocked comparator
like the ADCMP572 etc., and the other input connected to a slow DAC. The
tricky part is generating the clock pulse to the comparator, with
accurately variable timing relative to the trigger input, but this might
be easy if you control the stimulus to the circuit.
Another guy seems to have also thought of it:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1855991221/10-ghz-usb-oscilloscope
though he says the Hittite comparators are faster than the ADI ones.
Chris
I did it with tunnel diodes in 1969, inspired by a circuit in the GE Transistor
Manual.
The advantage of the EL flop is that it's within Joerg's budget. ...
It could do it but it would be a potentially long iterative process per
sample time slot. An option may be to use some clever seek method
instead of a stair-step ramp. Go to full, if not there go to half. If
there go to 3/4, if not there go to 1/4, and so on. In my case the
computational overhead would jinx it though.
You can do a feedback loop on the go/nogo decisions of the comparator/flipflop,
so the thing becomes a tracking ADC of sorts. That's not too awful if the
equivalent-time sweep is fairly slow.
If the clock rate is constant, the feedback loop could be just an RC or RLC from
Q to \D, something like that.
Might be an option, I'll have to think that through. The sweep time is
several hundred times the sampling window and can be made constant.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/