Guest
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:49:29 -0600, Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com>
wrote:
is suicidal.
isn't very good.
wrote:
I don't believe what's printed. Drawing lines outside what's printedOn Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:36:38 -0500, krw wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:08:20 -0600, Tim Wescott
tim@seemywebsite.please> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 20:32:05 -0500, krw wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 19:25:55 -0600, amdx <amdx@knologynotthis.net
wrote:
On 2/3/2013 6:35 PM, Tim Wescott wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:21:40 -0600, amdx wrote:
I have a 4 volt pulse that is 0.5 sec long. I need a 6 sec pulse
that will switch a 2n3904. The 4 volts has about a 400 ohm source
impedance.
I could use a 555, but first I need to invert the signal then
drive my 2n3904 switch, so I have 2 transistors and a 555. Oh yes I
could probably differentiate the 0.5 sec pulse to trigger the 555,
so maybe only 1 transistor and a 555.
Could someone help with a pulse stretcher circuit.
Maybe an RC, transistor, or, I have some FETs, J301 or 2N3819,
probably a diode. That will drive my final 2N3904 switch.
The 2N3904 switch is across the alert button on a Walkie Talkie
and
shorts about 3.5v to ground.
The longer story;
This started with "Have 5v regulator need 9 volts"
That particular problem is solved. everything has good clean power.
I have a Harbor Freight *Driveway sensor. The sensor triggers a
receiver with RF. The receiver in turn triggers the alert button on
a **Walkie Talkie. After a temporary install, I noted the Talkie
alert signaled 10 times.
That is to much, three times is fine. After trying several
things to eliminate the 10 alerts, I finally
wrapped the walkie talkie in aluminum foil. Problem solved. I'll
deal with this later by putting the Harbor Freight receiver inside
my boat and the walkie talkie outside where it's RF can get out.
(it's an all Aluminum boat)
The 0.5 sec pulse causes one alert signal. A six second pulse
causes three alert signals. Perfect!
74<your choice>123
Nice chip. You choose between positive- and negative-going pulses
in and out.
Not so great with that kind of delay.
Jamie's RC, power FET circuit worked good and fit easily, no power
supply needed, only 5 parts.
Bonus, I had all the parts.
I'm in Panama City Fl. The highway doesn't make it here. We are at
the end of the line. Nothing goes past us to get somewhere. I have a
radio Shack and a one man audio repair shop, that sells some parts.
I'll bet even DigiKey (via UPS) ships to that end of the line. ;-)
Six seconds. Hmm. Good point. Of course, nothing that's RC-based is
going to really be solid at that delay. For what he wants, though, any
halfway decent approximation to six seconds ought to be OK.
It's way off (three orders of magnitude off) the chart for the HC types,
at least according to TI. This sort of thing is right up the alley for
a 555, though.
So extend the charts!!
is suicidal.
555s are designed to work with much higher resistors. The '123 reallyThe delay time of a 74HC123 is roughly one RC time constant, you don't
want the resistance to be too low and if it gets too high then you have
to contend with board or capacitor leakage. The delay time of a 555 is
roughly the same, but you don't have the flexibility of input and output.
isn't very good.
Use a PIC. ;-)Either chip demands that you select a big, low-leakage cap, and a high
resistance, and accept the fact that your leakage is going to vary with
temperature and humidity. Understand that you'll wish that you had done
something with a counter from the git-go, and build your circuit.
I _think_ you could do this more reliably with a CD4060 and a dual J-K
flip-flop, or a 555, a CD4040, and that same J-K flip-flop, but I'd have
to toy with it to be sure and I don't think I care enough to try.