F
Fred Bartoli
Guest
"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone@example.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:2br0a1lod1os4snmf9p5daho45o2gs9lfr@4ax.com...
For example, from the moto 3055/2955 datasheet, VBEsat @ 7A is 1.3V for the
NPN vs 1.6V for the PNP.
Allow, say 150/200mV VCEsat for the driver and you have 1.5V vs 1.8V.
The "input stages" will work nicely at 1.5V and won't contribute anything to
VCEsat.
This obviously don't hold if you need a power NPN. Just revert to the 3
transistors circuit.
--
Thanks,
Fred.
news:2br0a1lod1os4snmf9p5daho45o2gs9lfr@4ax.com...
Certainly lower than for the 3 transitors PNP version.On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:35:41 +0200, "Fred Bartoli"
fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli@RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo> wrote:
[snip]
Then I invent this one :
.-----------+-----+-----
| | |
|< |< |
----| .---| |
|\ | |\ |
| | | |
| |/ | |/
'---| '---|
|> |
| |
'-----------+-----
which has an even more huge HFE, uses an NPN as the power element and
allow
a lower VCEsat (NPN power element).
It is very pompously named a smartlington.
And VCEsat=??
For example, from the moto 3055/2955 datasheet, VBEsat @ 7A is 1.3V for the
NPN vs 1.6V for the PNP.
Allow, say 150/200mV VCEsat for the driver and you have 1.5V vs 1.8V.
The "input stages" will work nicely at 1.5V and won't contribute anything to
VCEsat.
This obviously don't hold if you need a power NPN. Just revert to the 3
transistors circuit.
--
Thanks,
Fred.