Speakers and wire length

"William Sommerwerck"
"Bill Gill"
In one respect you are right +1 dB is just detectable.
That is how it was originally defined.

It was /never/ defined that way.

The bel is the logarithm (to the base 10) of a power ratio. Decibels are
ten times that. That a decibel just happens to be the smallest change in
level that can be easily detected is total coincidence.

** Correct.

Smaller changes can be heard under ideal conditions.

Amplitude modulation of 1dB is easily heard with tones.



..... Phil
 
"Bill Gill"
Phil Allison wrote:
"Bill Gill"

It takes ten times the power to seem twice as loud.

Ten times the power is 10 dB, that is 10 times as loud.

** Bollocks.

Most would say it was 2 or maybe 3 times as loud.


Twice as loud would be 3 dB.


** Bollocks again.

+3dB is only slightly louder.

+1dB is almost unnoticeable.


In one respect you are right +1 dB is just detectable.

** I am right in all respects.


> That is how it was originally defined.

** Bullshit.

+3dB is twice the power. To my
mind that is twice as loud.

** Insanity.




..... Phil
 
"William Sommerwanker is an Ass"

"Phil Allison"
I said "phase or timing differences", when I should have said "phase".
Above about 1kHz, phase differences are not used for directionality.

** But time of arrival for any transient is CRUCIAL !!

You're knowledgeable tons of things, but here you're wrong.

** FFS - I am agreeing with you.

Transients ARE high frequency sounds.



The ear cannot and does not hear phase

This is fact (read any book on acoustics). I confirmed it 44 years ago
when I used an oscillator with fixed and variable-phase output feeding
stereo headphones.

** Phase differences are not heard on headphones at all -- with *SINE*
waves.

They are.

** Like hell.


But with speech, music and other real sounds, reverse phase is VERY
obvious.

You didn't read what I wrote.

** I don't give a fuck what you wrote .

Cos you make shit up.


..... Phil


 
"Black Iccy" wrote in message
news:k6csj99kno8mjc36fkkbqeau6pjge9pcln@4ax.com...

The bel is the logarithm (to the base 10) of a power ratio.
Decibels are ten times that.

Errm, 1/10_th surely.

Nope. There are ten decibels in one bel.
 
On 4/3/2014 9:25 PM, gregz wrote:
Bill Gill <billnews2@cox.net> wrote:
On 4/2/2014 8:38 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
"Bill Gill"

It takes ten times the power to seem twice as loud.

Ten times the power is 10 dB, that is 10 times as loud.

** Bollocks.

Most would say it was 2 or maybe 3 times as loud.


Twice as loud would be 3 dB.


** Bollocks again.

+3dB is only slightly louder.

+1dB is almost unnoticeable.


.... Phil


In one respect you are right +1 dB is just detectable. That is
how it was originally defined. +3dB is twice the power. To my
mind that is twice as loud. +10 dB is 10 times the power. Again
that would be 10 times as loud. Check the math. The calculation
is 10 * log(10) P2/P1.

Bill

Twice as loud should be twice the voltage. Forget power.

Greg
Yes twice as loud would be twice the voltage, but
I was talking power, not voltage. Power and voltage are
closely related. You just have to be sure which one you
are talking about. Since I specifically said that I was
talking power then I am correct. As far as that goes the
voltage ratio in dB is twice the power ratio. That is,
the calculation is 20*log(10)v1/v2, instead of 10*log(10)p1/p2.

Bill
 
"Bill Gill"


** You anencephalic ?

If not - you are doing a spectacular impersonation of one.

Demented chimpanzees have more insight.





..... Phil
 
"Bill Gill" wrote in message news:lhk3lu$u3a$1@dont-email.me...

The transmission unit (TU) was devised by engineers of the Bell
Telephone Laboratories in the 1920s to replace the MSC. 1 TU
was defined as ten times the base-10 logarithm of the ratio of
measured power to a reference power level.[5] The definitions
were conveniently chosen such that 1 TU approximately equaled
1 MSC (specifically, 1.056 TU = 1 MSC).

This is possible, but it sounds like retroactive justification.
 
On 04/04/2014 06:26 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
"Bill Gill"


** You anencephalic ?

If not - you are doing a spectacular impersonation of one.

Demented chimpanzees have more insight.





.... Phil

I have an in-law named Bill Gill. My daughter's cousin. Austin.
 
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 05:43:35 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"
<grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

The bel is the logarithm (to the base 10) of a power ratio.
Decibels are ten times that.

Errm, 1/10_th surely.

Nope. There are ten decibels in one bel.

My point stands. A decibel is 1/10 of a bel.
That's what I said before. It's NOT what you wrote.
 
On Friday, April 4, 2014 11:01:48 PM UTC-7, Black Iccy wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 05:43:35 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"

grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:



The bel is the logarithm (to the base 10) of a power ratio.

Decibels are ten times that.



Errm, 1/10_th surely.



Nope. There are ten decibels in one bel.





My point stands. A decibel is 1/10 of a bel.

That's what I said before. It's NOT what you wrote.

So, to end this miserable tirade, you Both are saying there are Ten Decibels per Bel, eh...

FUNNY how conversation on Usenet works. . .

Or Not...
 
"Black Iccy"
"William Sommerwerck"

The bel is the logarithm (to the base 10) of a power ratio.
Decibels are ten times that.

Errm, 1/10_th surely.

Nope. There are ten decibels in one bel.


My point stands.

** It falls, like any of your pedantic tripe.


A decibel is 1/10 of a bel.
That's what I said before. It's NOT what you wrote.

** There is an obvious understood word at the end of Bill's remark.

That word is "number".

"Decibels are 10 times that NUMBER".

Given that the "log" of 10 is 1, a power ratio of 10 is 10 decibels or 1
Bell.



..... Phil
 
"Black Iccy" wrote in message
news:2o6vj9dinajsgjkdoefljdj332o72vna1h@4ax.com...
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 05:43:35 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"
<grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

The bel is the logarithm (to the base 10) of a power
ratio. Decibels are ten times that.

Errm, 1/10_th surely.

Nope. There are ten decibels in one bel.

My point stands. A decibel is 1/10 of a bel.
That's what I said before. It's NOT what you wrote.

In a rare show of magnanimity, Professor Marvel accepts the criticism.

What I meant to say was that "Decibels are obtained by multiplying bels by
ten." What I wrote was ambiguous.

You caught me on one my pet peeves. Ever seen an FM tuner with the dial
labeled "x 1MHz"? The displayed number is actually the frequency /divided/ by
1MHz.
 
On 4/4/2014 8:26 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
"Bill Gill"


** You anencephalic ?

If not - you are doing a spectacular impersonation of one.

Demented chimpanzees have more insight.





.... Phil
I didn't realize we were in the 2nd grade. Thanks for your
implied agreement with what I said.

Bill
 
"Bill Gill"
Phil Allison wrote:
"Bill Gill"


** You anencephalic ?

If not - you are doing a spectacular impersonation of one.

Demented chimpanzees have more insight.


I didn't realize we were in the 2nd grade.

** You are cunt brain - not me.

You need a hand grenade shoved up you fucking ass.





.... Phil




Thanks for your
implied agreement with what I said.

Bill
 
On 04/05/2014 06:14 AM, William Sommerwerck wrote:
"Black Iccy" wrote in message
news:2o6vj9dinajsgjkdoefljdj332o72vna1h@4ax.com...
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 05:43:35 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"
grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

The bel is the logarithm (to the base 10) of a power
ratio. Decibels are ten times that.

Errm, 1/10_th surely.

Nope. There are ten decibels in one bel.

My point stands. A decibel is 1/10 of a bel.
That's what I said before. It's NOT what you wrote.

In a rare show of magnanimity, Professor Marvel accepts the criticism.

What I meant to say was that "Decibels are obtained by multiplying bels
by ten." What I wrote was ambiguous.

You caught me on one my pet peeves. Ever seen an FM tuner with the dial
labeled "x 1MHz"? The displayed number is actually the frequency
/divided/ by 1MHz.

I like a chart which shows a a range of dB v Voltage at 50 Ohms for
Radio, 8, 4 Ohms for speakers. Hang it up over my bench.
 
On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 06:14:49 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"
<grizzledgeezer@comcast.net> wrote:

>In a rare show of magnanimity, Professor Marvel accepts the criticism.

Oh that's alright.
I knew what you meant, just that the wording was ... well...
I just HAD to. Phil is defending you too. Nice one Phil -)

You caught me on one my pet peeves. Ever seen an FM tuner with the dial
labeled "x 1MHz"? The displayed number is actually the frequency /divided/ by
1MHz.

Frayed knot.
 
"William Sommerwanker = Fool"

You caught me on one my pet peeves. Ever seen an FM tuner with the dial
labeled "x 1MHz"? The displayed number is actually the frequency /divided/
by 1MHz.

** " x 1MHz" = " multiply by 1 MHz "

IOW it is an instruction to the user, not a description.

Same goes for the Ohms ranges on all analogue multimeters.

X1, X10, X100, X1K etc.

Instructions of how to get the value in ohms from the display.

ONLY a completely autistic fuckwit like you would not get that immediately.



..... Phil
 
On 4/5/2014 8:36 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
"Bill Gill"
Phil Allison wrote:
"Bill Gill"


** You anencephalic ?

If not - you are doing a spectacular impersonation of one.

Demented chimpanzees have more insight.


I didn't realize we were in the 2nd grade.


** You are cunt brain - not me.

You need a hand grenade shoved up you fucking ass.





... Phil




Thanks for your
implied agreement with what I said.

Bill
I don't know. Do you think you can find anybody who would
do that for you? It sounds like an awfully messy way to kill
somebody.

Bill
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top