T
Tom Del Rosso
Guest
bitrex wrote:
Or maybe it's just a byproduct of having two-way symmetry as opposed to
radial symmetry like plants.
For planes it depends not only on reliability but on having adequate
power in one engine. They still have to be able to lose one.
On 4/8/2020 1:41 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 07:53:41 -0700 (PDT), Michael Terrell
terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:
https://conservativefighters.org/news/sen-rand-paul-recovers-from-coronavirus-and-now-hes-volunteering-at-a-kentucky-hospital/
He is an opthamologist in real life.
Two eyes, two lungs, two hands, two...
Two seems to be some kind of optimum number once you reach a certain
level of reliability, more than one and less than three. Like
long-range airliners nowadays. The four-jets are mostly money-losers
now; lumbering flying gas-tanks that carry passengers as a hobby
Or maybe it's just a byproduct of having two-way symmetry as opposed to
radial symmetry like plants.
For planes it depends not only on reliability but on having adequate
power in one engine. They still have to be able to lose one.