Soldering irons: made in America but designed in Russia?

On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:16:45 +0100, ian field wrote:
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote in message

Last year in December I bought a WES51 also here for the lab, to have a
spare. But I started using it a lot because the tiny PES51 pencil lays
much nicer in the hand than the fat LR-20 of the older stations. They
also added a nice feature, not important to me but to companies and the
fire marshall: If the iron isn't moved in an hour or so it automatically
shuts down. Grand total of $92 plus tax, with pencil and one tip, not a
bad deal at all.

Maybe they learned from the mass exodus of customers and fixed the non
existent reliability since the last time I had the misfortune to pay good
money for one of their products, but once bitten twice shy, I'm not giving
them any more of my money.
The same reason I'll never buy another NiMH battery or CFL light.

Cheers!
Rich
 
Rich Grise wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:16:45 +0100, ian field wrote:
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote in message
Last year in December I bought a WES51 also here for the lab, to have a
spare. But I started using it a lot because the tiny PES51 pencil lays
much nicer in the hand than the fat LR-20 of the older stations. They
also added a nice feature, not important to me but to companies and the
fire marshall: If the iron isn't moved in an hour or so it automatically
shuts down. Grand total of $92 plus tax, with pencil and one tip, not a
bad deal at all.

Maybe they learned from the mass exodus of customers and fixed the non
existent reliability since the last time I had the misfortune to pay good
money for one of their products, but once bitten twice shy, I'm not giving
them any more of my money.

The same reason I'll never buy another NiMH battery or CFL light.
It was the same for me, for a few years. Then I tried another batch of
CFL because CostCo had them for less than a buck a piece. Philips
Marathon, and they last and last and last. Of course I'd never buy a CFL
at boutique pricing since that's just not worth it.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
 
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote in message
news:Wv7Il.25299$Ws1.16967@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...
Rich Grise wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:16:45 +0100, ian field wrote:
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote in message
Last year in December I bought a WES51 also here for the lab, to have a
spare. But I started using it a lot because the tiny PES51 pencil lays
much nicer in the hand than the fat LR-20 of the older stations. They
also added a nice feature, not important to me but to companies and the
fire marshall: If the iron isn't moved in an hour or so it
automatically
shuts down. Grand total of $92 plus tax, with pencil and one tip, not a
bad deal at all.

Maybe they learned from the mass exodus of customers and fixed the non
existent reliability since the last time I had the misfortune to pay
good
money for one of their products, but once bitten twice shy, I'm not
giving
them any more of my money.

The same reason I'll never buy another NiMH battery or CFL light.


It was the same for me, for a few years. Then I tried another batch of CFL
because CostCo had them for less than a buck a piece. Philips Marathon,
and they last and last and last. Of course I'd never buy a CFL at boutique
pricing since that's just not worth it.
Regardless of brand I still find the light quality is not as advertised - a
20W CFL does NOT produce the same light as a 100W incandescent.

Its difficult for me to make a life expectancy comparison as I had surge
limiting NTC thermistors mounted in the switch plates, this prolonged the
life of incandescent bulbs by an impressive margin - certainly much longer
than some of the first electronic CFLs to hit the market.
 
In article <fjlIl.34167$fe2.29061@newsfe06.ams2>,
"ian field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> writes:
Regardless of brand I still find the light quality is not as advertised - a
20W CFL does NOT produce the same light as a 100W incandescent.
At least in Europe, the filament lamp equivalance is completely
misleading. (It's comparing against a softone bulb, which has
a painted coating to give a lower colour temperature, and almost
no one uses those, and they're much less efficient than the
commonly used filament lamps.)

In the UK, just use a 4:1 ratio, so 100W replacement will be a
25W CFL. You can get away with slightly less (e.g. 23W) if the
CFL has an exposed tube (no outer bulb) with well-spaced limbs
(minimum self-shadowing), but this also implies significantly
more bulky than the lamp it replaced, and it might not fit.

Generally, 18W CFLs here are marked as 100W equivalent, and
it's very clear to anyone who's tried them that they don't come
close. For those just trying CFLs for the first time, it gives
a very poor first impression, which in many cases is also the
last impression.

In the case of CFL reflector lamps, the ratio to use needs
reducing to 3:1 or even 2:1 for small ones. (A CFL light source
is particularly inappropriate for use in small reflector lamps.)

In countries with different mains voltage, the ratio may need
adjusting, as filament lamp efficiency varies with the design
voltage. (The most efficient voltage to design a 100W lamp is
about 55V, given a reasonable life requirement, and as you move
the design voltage away from 55V in either direction, the lamp
efficiency drops.)

--
Andrew Gabriel
[email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup]
 
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article <fjlIl.34167$fe2.29061@newsfe06.ams2>,
"ian field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> writes:

In countries with different mains voltage, the ratio may need
adjusting, as filament lamp efficiency varies with the design
voltage. (The most efficient voltage to design a 100W lamp is
about 55V, given a reasonable life requirement, and as you move
the design voltage away from 55V in either direction, the lamp
efficiency drops.)
Interesting. I can see it dropping due to conduction losses when the
voltage gets too low (so that the wire gets too fat) but what's the
mechanism for the drop-off at high voltages?

Cheers,

Phil Hobbs
 
In article <6pKdnW_chZqtYmzUnZ2dnUVZ_j1i4p2d@supernews.com>,
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> writes:
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article <fjlIl.34167$fe2.29061@newsfe06.ams2>,
"ian field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> writes:

In countries with different mains voltage, the ratio may need
adjusting, as filament lamp efficiency varies with the design
voltage. (The most efficient voltage to design a 100W lamp is
about 55V, given a reasonable life requirement, and as you move
the design voltage away from 55V in either direction, the lamp
efficiency drops.)


Interesting. I can see it dropping due to conduction losses when the
voltage gets too low (so that the wire gets too fat) but what's the
mechanism for the drop-off at high voltages?
Designing a full range of filament lamps to operate over a
wide range of voltages is a challenge rather like trying to
solve a set of simultaneous equations when there aren't
enough variables, so you end up with compromises, such as
lower efficiency.

To make a 240V filament, you need a very long thin wire.
It has far too much surface area to get to the 2700K operating
temperature without radiating 100W away at a lower temperature.
The way 240V filament lamps are made to work is to double
coil the filament, so that much of the filament is radiating
heat back onto itself, and the effective surface area for
radiating heat away from the filament is significantly
less than the filament's real surface area. This isn't as
effective as using an optimum thickness filament in the first
place, i.e. you have just the right surface area to radiate
100W when it's reached 2700K, and you still have a larger
surface area for filament evaporation and thinning.

And yes, you're right about heat loss by conduction down the
lead-in wires becoming increasingly significant at low
voltages/high currents. With longer fragile filaments, the loss
from the ends is proportionally less, but you may also require
filament supports, which are additional routes to lose heat,
and you lose more by convection to the gas-fill.

--
Andrew Gabriel
[email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup]
 
In article <pan.2009.04.21.21.22.39.565881@example.net>,
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <null@example.net> wrote:


I could live with arbitrarily high gasonline taxes, since I only have a
bike. ;-)

So all the things you buy are delivered to the stores on bikes?
 
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:23:57 -0700, Smitty Two wrote:
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <null@example.net> wrote:

I could live with arbitrarily high gasonline taxes, since I only have a
bike. ;-)

So all the things you buy are delivered to the stores on bikes?
That's not my call, thank you very much.

Cheers!
Rich
 
In article <pan.2009.04.26.20.23.54.527997@yahoo.com>,
Richard the Dreaded Libertarian <richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:23:57 -0700, Smitty Two wrote:
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <null@example.net> wrote:

I could live with arbitrarily high gasonline taxes, since I only have a
bike. ;-)

So all the things you buy are delivered to the stores on bikes?

That's not my call, thank you very much.

Cheers!
Rich
Um, uh, hello? So you really think that gasoline prices don't impact
your life, just because you personally don't burn the stuff? You don't
think the prices of every single thing you buy are influenced heavily by
fuel costs? Your world isn't *that* insular, is it?
 
Smitty Two wrote:
In article <pan.2009.04.26.20.23.54.527997@yahoo.com>,
Richard the Dreaded Libertarian <richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:23:57 -0700, Smitty Two wrote:
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <null@example.net> wrote:

I could live with arbitrarily high gasonline taxes, since I only have a
bike. ;-)

So all the things you buy are delivered to the stores on bikes?

That's not my call, thank you very much.

Cheers!
Rich

Um, uh, hello? So you really think that gasoline prices don't impact
your life, just because you personally don't burn the stuff? You don't
think the prices of every single thing you buy are influenced heavily by
fuel costs? Your world isn't *that* insular, is it?

He doesn't think. That's the problem. As long as he can get his
booze, he doesn't care.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!
 
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:53:49 -0700, Smitty Two wrote:
In article <pan.2009.04.26.20.23.54.527997@yahoo.com>,
Richard the Dreaded Libertarian <richardgrise@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:23:57 -0700, Smitty Two wrote:
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <null@example.net> wrote:

I could live with arbitrarily high gasonline taxes, since I only have a
bike. ;-)

So all the things you buy are delivered to the stores on bikes?

That's not my call, thank you very much.

Um, uh, hello? So you really think that gasoline prices don't impact
your life, just because you personally don't burn the stuff? You don't
think the prices of every single thing you buy are influenced heavily by
fuel costs? Your world isn't *that* insular, is it?
Gawd, you people sure do make up a lot of stuff. Prices are going up
anyway, for any number of reasons; I have no control over that in any
case. (Try buying food that used no fuel in the manufacturing.) All I
was saying is that I don't buy gasoline.

Are you advocating lobbying for fuelless food delivery? Sorry, I'm not
one of those activist fools.

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:00:21 GMT, qrk <SpamTrap@spam.net> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:08:32 +0100, Allus Smith <allus_smith@com.com
wrote:

All this talk about soldering irons makes me think how crummy too
much American industrial design is.

Some US industrial design looks great but some looks downright,
well, Russian.

Sure you can see crap-looking design in western Europe too but
there's a lot less of it than in the US.

Take soldering irons for example. An ordinary soldering iron in
the US with unregulated temperature still has great big mofo screws
holding the tip.

By comparison, my 30 year old British-made basic Antex is a sleek
looking baby and those Antexes are not particularly expensive.

Don't start me on the looks of cars!

If you expect something from a $10 hardware store soldering iron
that's made in China, you shouldn't be in electronics. The only people
who use those are kids starting out in tronics and people who don't
know anything about electronics.

If you want a good iron, get a Metcal (now OK). Metcal has soldering
irons for under $200 which work very well for SMT and thruhole. My
only gripe about the cheap Metcals is the tip temperature only goes up
to 750 deg F. Gotta use my 20+ year old Weller iron for melting
isulation off of magnet wire.

If you really want to see a classic soldering iron, get your hands on
an American Beauty! You'll drop your shorts when you get your hands on
that one.
My dad had one, 150 W i think. It would solder 12 Ga. sheet metal.
.
 
On Apr 21, 6:08 am, Allus Smith <allus_sm...@com.com> wrote:
All this talk about soldering irons makes me think how crummy too
much American industrial design is.

Some US industrial design looks great but some looks downright,
well, Russian.

Sure you can see crap-looking design in western Europe too but
there's a lot less of it than in the US.

Take soldering irons for example.  An ordinary soldering iron in
the US with unregulated temperature still has great big mofo screws
holding the tip.

By comparison, my 30 year old British-made basic Antex is a sleek
looking baby and those Antexes are not particularly expensive.

Don't start me on the looks of cars!

--
Russian in Americahttp://www.funnyordie.com/videos/bc54d50403/svetlana-pilot-episode
------------------

Oh, but the Russians do have some interesting products


http://www.artlebedev.ru/everything/vilcus/


"its for people who like connecting electricity with own fingers"

"there are many curious people trying to get their fingers in plug,
and
this is an easy way to do it"



and at bottom under the power board
"our perfectly designed network port will match group sessions"
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top