K
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
On Thu, 17 May 2012 15:25:35 +0100, "Ian Field"
<gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote:
<gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> wrote:
....and that has always been a poor excuse.krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message
news:ak48r7tontcvi50lc1mthrhsirefejootf@4ax.com...
On Wed, 16 May 2012 10:44:03 -0700, Fred Abse
excretatauris@invalid.invalid
wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2012 16:19:44 -0400, Phil Hobbs wrote:
The British solved that problem by
the traditional method of "add mass until nothing breaks."
Shame they had to go for thick rectangular section pins with contact only
on two sides. About a third of the surface area wasted. The ones I've come
into contact (no pun) with seem to get rather hot on full load.
Nasty clumsy things.
The German Schuko system seems to me to be superior.
Over-designed and too expensive. Typical German stuff.
They've always done it that way!!
In WW2 their tanks had to be literally stripped down out in the field if
anything broke.