F
Fred Bartoli
Guest
Ian Field a écrit :
--
Thanks,
Fred.
Once it's plugged in it automatically get soldered...
--
Thanks,
Fred.
D
Daniel Pitts
Guest
On 5/15/12 1:42 PM, Ian Field wrote:
appropriate coupling. That created a few fires, not related to plugs.
idiots who tended to upgrade part of a system to copper, without an
appropriate coupling. That created a few fires, not related to plugs.
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:32:23 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Yes, he does. Yuk.
PettyProng is actually getting more social, and JF is getting less.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:20:04 +0200, Fred Bartoli <" "> wrote:
having a problem with a plug/outlet combination, in decades at least.
The US stuff is remarkably reliable, for being so cheap. I can buy a
dual grounded outlet, or a light switch, for about 79 cents, white or
ivory.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
Usually it's the cord that gets warmer than the plug. I can't recall
having a problem with a plug/outlet combination, in decades at least.
The US stuff is remarkably reliable, for being so cheap. I can buy a
dual grounded outlet, or a light switch, for about 79 cents, white or
ivory.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
J
John Fields
Guest
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:32:23 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
That you could discern.
Your bad.
---
You say that over and over again, as if the endless repetition of your
lies, on a prayer wheel, leads to truth.
---
When I have to deal with pricks and assholes and the shit they espouse
as truth, I have to reply to their nonsense in terms they understand,
ergo my references to poop.
The being wrong part is just a ploy, on your part, to keep from having
to respond to criticism which pools you in with the bad guys.
One of which you are.
--
JF
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
---
That you could discern.
Your bad.
---
---
You say that over and over again, as if the endless repetition of your
lies, on a prayer wheel, leads to truth.
---
---
When I have to deal with pricks and assholes and the shit they espouse
as truth, I have to reply to their nonsense in terms they understand,
ergo my references to poop.
The being wrong part is just a ploy, on your part, to keep from having
to respond to criticism which pools you in with the bad guys.
One of which you are.
--
JF
K
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:29:12 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
You really have cracked.
Speaking of lies, you're pretty good at it!
More lies.
More lies. You say nothing worth commenting on.
Then why don't you do us both a favor and killfile me?
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:29:12 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
--
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
No, it's just the center of your life.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
J
John Fields
Guest
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:44:50 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
As evidenced by _your_ inability to supply evidence to support your
malevolent conjectures?
---
So, you finally admit that I'm pretty good at speaking of lies, even
though yours are the ones being spoken of?
---
So say you, but you post no logic or reason to support your position;
just bluster, as is your wont.
---
Then why comment?
---
Starting to feel the heat, huh?
--
JF
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
---
As evidenced by _your_ inability to supply evidence to support your
malevolent conjectures?
---
---
So, you finally admit that I'm pretty good at speaking of lies, even
though yours are the ones being spoken of?
---
---
So say you, but you post no logic or reason to support your position;
just bluster, as is your wont.
---
---
Then why comment?
---
---
Starting to feel the heat, huh?
--
JF
K
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:51:05 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
convinced.
well as you do poop. Sick.
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
You're some pot.
More evidence that you're illiterate. Keep it up, almost everyone's
convinced.
The evidence is in your writing, Mr. Scat.
What a pot.
No, but if it pains you so much... ...well, I guess you could enjoy pain, as
well as you do poop. Sick.
J
John Fields
Guest
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:50:05 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
How so?
You seem to be very big at making accusations, but very small at
following them through with arguments to which you know will lead to
their demise, your propensity being toward cowardly hit and run
tactics and perpetuation of your evil spirit.
---
What's that supposed to mean?
---
--
JF
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
---
How so?
You seem to be very big at making accusations, but very small at
following them through with arguments to which you know will lead to
their demise, your propensity being toward cowardly hit and run
tactics and perpetuation of your evil spirit.
---
---
What's that supposed to mean?
---
Why would that be a favor to me?
--
JF
K
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:49:14 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
bad!
time. You won't like the stink.
be drawn is that you're a masochist. Not that it would surprise anyone. It
would go with your scat and queer fetishes.
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
You can't even read your own writing? I knew you were illiterate, but that's
bad!
Net Lucy's office is open, again, I see. Maybe you should try a mirror some
time. You won't like the stink.
You really are stupid. Pot, kettle, black?
Because clearly you don't like my posting. The only other conclusion that can
be drawn is that you're a masochist. Not that it would surprise anyone. It
would go with your scat and queer fetishes.
J
John Fields
Guest
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:20:13 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Once again, a desperate attempt to avoid answering the question by
skirting it with a straw man.
---
Hmmm...
From what you write, it seems your senses of smell and vision have
been so thoroughly intertwined - by having your head up your ass for
such a long time - that you can't distinguish between them.
---
"pot" instead of "PKB" is misleading - par for the course for you -
and PKB has nothing to do with my comment, which was merely a query
eliciting an explanation of why you'd choose to comment on what you
said wasn't worth commenting on.
---
Au contraire!
I thoroughly enjoy pricking balloons, especially tiny ones like yours
which you've inflated as much as you can with your weak mind and,
knowing no better, consider them to be masterworks of logic and reason
but which are, in reality, banal.
---
Not true but, if I were a true masochist and I'd be looking for that,
I'd knuckle under to someone who wields a lot more power than you do.
---
Ah, a foregone conclusion with no proof?
Typical.
Dealing with you lot, and accepting all of your objections to "nasty"
talk is pretty much like giving up free speech because you deem it
unseemly and want to quell it.
--
JF
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
---
Once again, a desperate attempt to avoid answering the question by
skirting it with a straw man.
---
---
Hmmm...
From what you write, it seems your senses of smell and vision have
been so thoroughly intertwined - by having your head up your ass for
such a long time - that you can't distinguish between them.
---
---
"pot" instead of "PKB" is misleading - par for the course for you -
and PKB has nothing to do with my comment, which was merely a query
eliciting an explanation of why you'd choose to comment on what you
said wasn't worth commenting on.
---
---
Au contraire!
I thoroughly enjoy pricking balloons, especially tiny ones like yours
which you've inflated as much as you can with your weak mind and,
knowing no better, consider them to be masterworks of logic and reason
but which are, in reality, banal.
---
---
Not true but, if I were a true masochist and I'd be looking for that,
I'd knuckle under to someone who wields a lot more power than you do.
---
---
Ah, a foregone conclusion with no proof?
Typical.
Dealing with you lot, and accepting all of your objections to "nasty"
talk is pretty much like giving up free speech because you deem it
unseemly and want to quell it.
--
JF
K
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:35:22 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
written.
you can't even read what you've written, so I don't expect you to understand.
Figures.
sick.
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
You wrote it. I can't help you if you're too dumb to read what you've
written.
It's simple, simpleton. You write shit so much it stinks. You've shown that
you can't even read what you've written, so I don't expect you to understand.
Only for the incredibly stupid. You're too stupid to even follow along.
Figures.
You're sick.---
One of which you are.
Then why don't you do us both a favor and killfile me?
Why would that be a favor to me?
Because clearly you don't like my posting.
---
Au contraire!
You enjoy pricks, that's for sure. Assholes, shit, and male genitalia. You're
sick.
You're *just* like AlwaysWrong. You come here for abuse. ...a masochist.
Me provide proof? No need. You provide it nearly every day.
Indeed. You can't write without using scat references.
Good lord, you're stupid!
I
Ian Field
Guest
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message
news:dnh5t751bqoue960b8g7fjull6knfg0k1u@4ax.com...
news:dnh5t751bqoue960b8g7fjull6knfg0k1u@4ax.com...
JF is dense enough to seed a black hole!On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:35:22 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:20:13 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:49:14 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:50:05 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:51:05 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:44:50 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:29:12 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 17:32:23 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 16:07:34 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 10:15:31 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:59:23 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 09:46:08 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
.
.
.
---
As usual, nothing of any substance.
Illiterate, as usual.
---
Wrong again, since an illiterate person wouldn't be able to read,
let
alone comment on the lack of substance in your - mostly -
ignominious
posts.
You didn't make any literate comment.
---
That you could discern.
Your bad.
You really have cracked.
---
As evidenced by _your_ inability to supply evidence to support your
malevolent conjectures?
You're some pot.
---
Interestingly, while most of the rest of us seem to exhibit
varying
degrees of gain, your "expositions" seem to be equal to even less
than
the sum of your meager parts.
You're projecting, again.
---
You say that over and over again, as if the endless repetition of
your
lies, on a prayer wheel, leads to truth.
---
Speaking of lies, you're pretty good at it!
---
So, you finally admit that I'm pretty good at speaking of lies, even
though yours are the ones being spoken of?
More evidence that you're illiterate. Keep it up, almost everyone's
convinced.
---
Just as an aside, while you were talking about you in another
thread,
you mentioned that you were working in advanced development.
Yes.
Can you tell us a little bit about how ULINE
http://www.uline.com/Grp_204/Toilet-Paper?keywords=toilet+paper
manages to help you clandestinely dispose of your mistakes?
You always have men's body parts, feces, and bathroom behavior on
your mind,
and you're always wrong. Really, are you related to AlwaysWrong?
---
When I have to deal with pricks and assholes and the shit they
espouse
as truth, I have to reply to their nonsense in terms they
understand,
ergo my references to poop.
More lies.
---
So say you, but you post no logic or reason to support your position;
just bluster, as is your wont.
The evidence is in your writing, Mr. Scat.
---
How so?
You can't even read your own writing? I knew you were illiterate, but
that's
bad!
---
Once again, a desperate attempt to avoid answering the question by
skirting it with a straw man.
You wrote it. I can't help you if you're too dumb to read what you've
written.
---
You seem to be very big at making accusations, but very small at
following them through with arguments to which you know will lead to
their demise, your propensity being toward cowardly hit and run
tactics and perpetuation of your evil spirit.
Net Lucy's office is open, again, I see. Maybe you should try a mirror
some
time. You won't like the stink.
---
Hmmm...
From what you write, it seems your senses of smell and vision have
been so thoroughly intertwined - by having your head up your ass for
^^^
such a long time - that you can't distinguish between them.
It's simple, simpleton. You write shit so much it stinks. You've shown
that
you can't even read what you've written, so I don't expect you to
understand.
---
The being wrong part is just a ploy, on your part, to keep from
having
to respond to criticism which pools you in with the bad guys.
More lies. You say nothing worth commenting on.
---
Then why comment?
What a pot.
---
What's that supposed to mean?
You really are stupid. Pot, kettle, black?
---
"pot" instead of "PKB" is misleading - par for the course for you -
and PKB has nothing to do with my comment, which was merely a query
eliciting an explanation of why you'd choose to comment on what you
said wasn't worth commenting on.
Only for the incredibly stupid. You're too stupid to even follow along.
Figures.
---
One of which you are.
Then why don't you do us both a favor and killfile me?
Why would that be a favor to me?
Because clearly you don't like my posting.
---
Au contraire!
You're sick.
I thoroughly enjoy pricking balloons, especially tiny ones like yours
which you've inflated as much as you can with your weak mind and,
knowing no better, consider them to be masterworks of logic and reason
but which are, in reality, banal.
You enjoy pricks, that's for sure. Assholes, shit, and male genitalia.
You're
sick.
---
The only other conclusion that can be drawn is that you're a masochist.
---
Not true but, if I were a true masochist and I'd be looking for that,
I'd knuckle under to someone who wields a lot more power than you do.
You're *just* like AlwaysWrong. You come here for abuse. ...a
masochist.
---
Not that it would surprise anyone. It
would go with your scat and queer fetishes.
---
Ah, a foregone conclusion with no proof?
Me provide proof? No need. You provide it nearly every day.
Typical.
Indeed. You can't write without using scat references.
Dealing with you lot, and accepting all of your objections to "nasty"
talk is pretty much like giving up free speech because you deem it
unseemly and want to quell it.
Good lord, you're stupid!
J
John Fields
Guest
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 23:52:19 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Realizing you've been brought up short and are unable to dispose of
the matter in a way which will allow you to save face, you have no
defense and choose to go for the ad hominem dodge.
---
Just more ad hominem but, since you choose to put it that way, I do
write about you quite bit so, if you think my writing stinks like
shit, perhaps it's because of the odiferous subject.
---
As much as you prance, one would think you had more going for you than
a coarse, ego-driven vendetta.
So far, that doesn't seem to be the case since you present no
arguments to substantiate your case and rely, instead, on nonsensical,
vindictive vitriol.
---
So says the poor lost soul who can't heal himself and is too proud to
admit that he's circling the drain.
---
I enjoy all of that, metaphorically, in order to use slang to present
arresting visuals.
Your rabid objection to those visuals, I believe, speaks volumes about
fear.
---
What you consider to be abuse is, in fact, just noise.
You have no humorous, witty repartee to offer when you've been foiled
and, instead, blame everyone but yourself for the defeat you've
suffered and refuse to own up to.
---
How so?
I've never said that I've ever indulged in, or approved of,
coprophagia, fellatio, buggery, etc., yet my mere mention of those
acts drives you into a tizzy.
Why might that be?
---
"Lord" is proper.
--
JF
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
---
Realizing you've been brought up short and are unable to dispose of
the matter in a way which will allow you to save face, you have no
defense and choose to go for the ad hominem dodge.
---
---
Just more ad hominem but, since you choose to put it that way, I do
write about you quite bit so, if you think my writing stinks like
shit, perhaps it's because of the odiferous subject.
---
---
As much as you prance, one would think you had more going for you than
a coarse, ego-driven vendetta.
So far, that doesn't seem to be the case since you present no
arguments to substantiate your case and rely, instead, on nonsensical,
vindictive vitriol.
---
---One of which you are.
Then why don't you do us both a favor and killfile me?
Why would that be a favor to me?
Because clearly you don't like my posting.
---
Au contraire!
You're sick.
So says the poor lost soul who can't heal himself and is too proud to
admit that he's circling the drain.
---
---
I enjoy all of that, metaphorically, in order to use slang to present
arresting visuals.
Your rabid objection to those visuals, I believe, speaks volumes about
fear.
---
---
What you consider to be abuse is, in fact, just noise.
You have no humorous, witty repartee to offer when you've been foiled
and, instead, blame everyone but yourself for the defeat you've
suffered and refuse to own up to.
---
---
How so?
I've never said that I've ever indulged in, or approved of,
coprophagia, fellatio, buggery, etc., yet my mere mention of those
acts drives you into a tizzy.
Why might that be?
---
---
"Lord" is proper.
--
JF
K
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:24:51 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
on. That and men's body parts. Sick.
writing. You're a sick, twisted, freak.
bit. None offered.
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
I suppose you don't look in a mirror, pot.
No, it stinks like shit because you write about it. Apparently it turns you
on. That and men's body parts. Sick.
Wrong, but you seem to enjoy it. Sick.
I don't have to. You constantly make my case for me, you sick freak.
There's good reason you don't look in a mirror, eh, sick freak?---
One of which you are.
Then why don't you do us both a favor and killfile me?
Why would that be a favor to me?
Because clearly you don't like my posting.
---
Au contraire!
You're sick.
---
So says the poor lost soul who can't heal himself and is too proud to
admit that he's circling the drain.
No metaphor about it. The more you talk the more it comes out in your
writing. You're a sick, twisted, freak.
No fear, moron, disgust.
Yet you find yourself like a moth to the flame...
Your a sick, twisted, freak. There is no witty repartee that changes that a
bit. None offered.
Again, you can't even read what you've written.
The fact is that it's never far from your mind.
Because you're a sick, twisted freak. ...and know it.
I notice that you didn't object to the stupid part. You can't.
J
John Fields
Guest
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:44:18 -0400, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Had I used the ad hominem device, your reference to PKB might have had
some relevance but, since I didn't, your reference is nonsensical.
---
So, I write about shit and my writing stinks like shit?
Since you're the subject at hand, lately, I must be doing you justice.
---
Yeah, it does.
Nailing posers like you, who stink like shit and pretend to stations
where they don't belong, makes me feel good.
---
I don't think I've ever said, or intimated, that someone's penis in my
mouth or anus was something I was looking forward to, so your
"argument" is specious.
---
How so?
I head you off at the pass and, since you don't have the intellect to
climb out of the ever-deepening hole you keep digging for yourself,
all you can do is try to throw the onus for your ineptitude on me with
your neverending ad hominem garbage.
---
Ad hominem non-sequitur.
---
Geez, all I said was I thoroughly enjoy pricking balloons, and that
was enough to get you to go postal???
If that's all it takes to enrage you, then I think you should
seriously consider anger-management therapy.
---
Well, being in denial, of course you'd have to say that.
---
Yow!!!
Was that really you???
Finally, there seems to be some sentient life on that planet since she
rises from torpor and flatters herself!
I find myself more like an adaptive filter trying to glean reason from
chaos while immersed in a field of noise.
In your case, that would be like me latching on to you for a while and
trying to decide whether you were the simian who unknowingly typed out
the Encyclopedia Britannica.
---
Aw, poor baby's defeats have stretched her defenses beyond their
limits and, consequently, reduced her to bad-mouthing instead of
logical refutation.
---
Quote?
---
Nope, it's because whenever you perverts hear of any reference to a
women's body and can't dispose of it in a healthy way, you masturbate.
---
--
JF
<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
---
Had I used the ad hominem device, your reference to PKB might have had
some relevance but, since I didn't, your reference is nonsensical.
---
---
So, I write about shit and my writing stinks like shit?
Since you're the subject at hand, lately, I must be doing you justice.
---
---
Yeah, it does.
Nailing posers like you, who stink like shit and pretend to stations
where they don't belong, makes me feel good.
---
---
I don't think I've ever said, or intimated, that someone's penis in my
mouth or anus was something I was looking forward to, so your
"argument" is specious.
---
---
How so?
I head you off at the pass and, since you don't have the intellect to
climb out of the ever-deepening hole you keep digging for yourself,
all you can do is try to throw the onus for your ineptitude on me with
your neverending ad hominem garbage.
---
---One of which you are.
Then why don't you do us both a favor and killfile me?
Why would that be a favor to me?
Because clearly you don't like my posting.
---
Au contraire!
You're sick.
---
So says the poor lost soul who can't heal himself and is too proud to
admit that he's circling the drain.
There's good reason you don't look in a mirror, eh, sick freak?
Ad hominem non-sequitur.
---
---
Geez, all I said was I thoroughly enjoy pricking balloons, and that
was enough to get you to go postal???
If that's all it takes to enrage you, then I think you should
seriously consider anger-management therapy.
---
---
Well, being in denial, of course you'd have to say that.
---
---
Yow!!!
Was that really you???
Finally, there seems to be some sentient life on that planet since she
rises from torpor and flatters herself!
I find myself more like an adaptive filter trying to glean reason from
chaos while immersed in a field of noise.
In your case, that would be like me latching on to you for a while and
trying to decide whether you were the simian who unknowingly typed out
the Encyclopedia Britannica.
---
---
Aw, poor baby's defeats have stretched her defenses beyond their
limits and, consequently, reduced her to bad-mouthing instead of
logical refutation.
---
---
Quote?
---
---
Nope, it's because whenever you perverts hear of any reference to a
women's body and can't dispose of it in a healthy way, you masturbate.
---
--
JF
K
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
Guest
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:40:09 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
you think (and write) about.
hypocritical, freak.
but the truth is obvious.
needed.
first.
you called me a queer, or even a shithead, you'd get too excited to finish the
sentence.
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
Had you? You use them all the time, hypocrite! What a loser...
Since you can't read, it's not surprising that you're completely lost.
As I said, you're a sick bastard.
No, shit turns you on, loser. Just like DimBulb, shit and men's junk, are all
you think (and write) about.
It's all you can talk about. It's sick.
You continue to do it, you sick freak!
Not only can't you read but you can't think. No surprise, though.
Wrong. Fact and perfectly on the topic of this thread. You are a sick,---
One of which you are.
Then why don't you do us both a favor and killfile me?
Why would that be a favor to me?
Because clearly you don't like my posting.
---
Au contraire!
You're sick.
---
So says the poor lost soul who can't heal himself and is too proud to
admit that he's circling the drain.
There's good reason you don't look in a mirror, eh, sick freak?
---
Ad hominem non-sequitur.
hypocritical, freak.
You obviously enjoy pricking men's asses, too. You're a sick freak.
Enrage, no, you still haven't a clue. Disgusted, certainly.
You, Mr. Hypocrite, are the one in denial, here. You can lie all you want,
but the truth is obvious.
Good grief, you're stupid!
No, you *are* noise.
No, you're the illiterate dumbass, here.
The conclusion *is* that you're a sick, twisted, freak. No more "proof"
needed.
Why? You have a long history of scat references here. It's where you go
first.
He says, pulling the worst insult he could come up with out of thin air. If
you called me a queer, or even a shithead, you'd get too excited to finish the
sentence.
J
John Fields
Guest
---
Every man's reach should exceed his grasp so, obviously, logic and
Latin are not yet even within your reach.
Ad hominem, or fact?
---
---
Death throes, huh?
We both know that I can read and unhorse you at leisure, so your
comment about being completely lost might be better addressed to that
mirror you're so fond of asking who's the fairest of them all.
---
---
As I've proved earlier, what you say when you've been challenged has
nothing to do with truth.
Instead, it's all just about your protecting your precious ego against
interlopers who might encroach on ground which you consider to be
sacrosanct.
---
---
Wrong again, but, even if you were right, would that predilection
prevent me from seeing through you and exposing you for the bully
you'd like to be?
---
---
Actually, you brought it up...
---
---
The surprise is that you - while pretending to be honest - initiate
and perpetuate lies which are - and have been - easily refuted.
---
---
If "prick", to you, is only a penile reference, then it's easy to see
how you could relate popping balloons to buggery.
Your problem, not mine.
---
---
To be proper, disgust would result in disengagement, yet you persist
in your folly.
---
---
Then state what you think it is.
---
---
Then you think I'm God?
---
---
Since you obviously get my drift, that can't be quite true, can it?
---
---
Who's conclusion?
Yours?
You can't even present a proper offense and yet you expect everyone to
follow you across a battlefield earlier littered with the corpses of
your dead arguments.
---
---
Scat???
What does that mean?
--
JF