Shame, Shame Shame on you Phil Allison

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:52:37 +1100,
tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com wrote:


But then again on the internet bad english is common.
and of course bad manners is common as well.
Click to expand...
I think that's bad manners "are" common. :)
 
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:43:55 +1100, "Galimatias"
<clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:50:08 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

There
have been few people damaged by their active, even vigorous,
participation in NGs.

Would you be able to post proof of this? :)

Yes.
Click to expand...
Then please do so. I happen to think you're wrong.
 
paul packer wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:43:55 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:50:08 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

There
have been few people damaged by their active, even vigorous,
participation in NGs.

Would you be able to post proof of this? :)

Yes.

Then please do so. I happen to think you're wrong.
Click to expand...
Which means that you are right, and that you know of people who have been so
damaged. In this case, since it will be easy for you to post proof of your
knowledge, after you.
 
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:45:43 +1100, "Galimatias"
<clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:43:55 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:50:08 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

There
have been few people damaged by their active, even vigorous,
participation in NGs.

Would you be able to post proof of this? :)

Yes.

Then please do so. I happen to think you're wrong.

Which means that you are right, and that you know of people who have been so
damaged. In this case, since it will be easy for you to post proof of your
knowledge, after you.
Click to expand...
Actually I'm going by my own experience. I've certainly been hurt by
things said on NGs (not this one--yet). Of course it depends on your
definition of "damaged". There are some pretty nasty, personal things
said on NGs, and not all can be forgotten or forgiven.

Too thin skinned? Probably.
 
"paul packer" <packer@iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:41d3f898.34255499@news.iprimus.com.au...
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:45:43 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:43:55 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:50:08 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

There
have been few people damaged by their active, even vigorous,
participation in NGs.

Would you be able to post proof of this? :)

Yes.

Then please do so. I happen to think you're wrong.

Which means that you are right, and that you know of people who have been
so
damaged. In this case, since it will be easy for you to post proof of
your
knowledge, after you.

Actually I'm going by my own experience. I've certainly been hurt by
things said on NGs (not this one--yet). Of course it depends on your
definition of "damaged". There are some pretty nasty, personal things
said on NGs, and not all can be forgotten or forgiven.

Too thin skinned? Probably.
Click to expand...
Don't be such a fucking pussy you limp wristed twat.




PS I'm kidding :)
 
paul packer wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:45:43 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:43:55 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

paul packer wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:50:08 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

There
have been few people damaged by their active, even vigorous,
participation in NGs.

Would you be able to post proof of this? :)

Yes.

Then please do so. I happen to think you're wrong.

Which means that you are right, and that you know of people who have
been so damaged. In this case, since it will be easy for you to
post proof of your knowledge, after you.

Actually I'm going by my own experience. I've certainly been hurt by
things said on NGs (not this one--yet). Of course it depends on your
definition of "damaged". There are some pretty nasty, personal things
said on NGs, and not all can be forgotten or forgiven.

Too thin skinned? Probably.
Click to expand...
Well, since you have opened the door to your own experience, tell me if you
have not had your feelings hurt at every Christmas gathering you have ever
attended. (This is only for illustrative purposes.) Not too unusual an
occurrence. You didn't get the present you had hoped for, or someone got a
bigger piece of pudding, or there was a spat between some relos over nothing
at all really which put a damper on things for a while, and so on. That's
everyone's lot in life - a saga of hurt feelings, real and imagined. Of
course, this is relieved by the many episodes of sheer delight, as you might
also have experienced.

Now, moving to Unsenet, there just is no comparison. As you say, you have
to be thin skinned to he hurt by anything done on a NG, however nasty or
personal it might be. It's not like being hit by a large wave, or a drunk
in a car, or losing a job. And you can always KF the offender, or
retaliate, or mock, or even walk away.

BTW, one case is not "few". Unless you have multiple personalities.
 
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:40:27 +1100, "Galimatias"
<clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:47:43 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

Brian Goldsmith wrote:
"Galimatias" <clamour@incoherence.org

In the RW, we all get our share of annoyances, and most deal with it
in a fairly relaxed fashion. Usenet is no different, unless you
consider an annoyance in the form of abuse or other OT comment too
much to bear. There have been few people damaged by their active,
even vigorous, participation in NGs.

****Please elaborate on the last sentence.

More than happy to do so. Please put $200 in $5 notes into a plain
A4 envelope addressed to me and let me know when it is ready.

Did you mean there have
been a few people damaged or did you mean there have been very few
people damaged,the difference in meaning is great.

Yes. Worrying, isn't it? I take it that English is a second
language for you.

Thanks,Brian Goldsmith.

No problem, Brian. I'm sure it will be nice doing business with you.



few = not many

whether he meant "very few" or "a few", probably makes no difference
in actual numbers, but just shows us that the poster has trouble
typing proper English.

Of course it would be a help if the poster could actually construct
his sentences properly,using correct syntax.
But then again on the internet bad english is common.
and of course bad manners is common as well.

Funny how people use bad language, when shown to be
wrong.

Please have the goodness to indicate the "bad manners" and the "bad
language" in any of the above. Could you also indicate how you deduced that
the poster was a "he". You may or may not be correct. My interest is in
the reasoning process. Thank you very much.
Click to expand...
you were told in the previous post.If you still don't know what you're
doing wrong after you've been told what you were doing wrong, then you
have more than a mild syntax problem,but a basic comprehension problem
as well.

The"he"context (in terms of using it as a collective noun)
is further proof of your lack of english language training.

any more dumb questions after you've been told the answer and you
should seriously go back to remdial school.





 
tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:40:27 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:47:43 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

Brian Goldsmith wrote:
"Galimatias" <clamour@incoherence.org

In the RW, we all get our share of annoyances, and most deal with
it in a fairly relaxed fashion. Usenet is no different, unless you
consider an annoyance in the form of abuse or other OT comment too
much to bear. There have been few people damaged by their active,
even vigorous, participation in NGs.

****Please elaborate on the last sentence.

More than happy to do so. Please put $200 in $5 notes into a plain
A4 envelope addressed to me and let me know when it is ready.

Did you mean there have
been a few people damaged or did you mean there have been very few
people damaged,the difference in meaning is great.

Yes. Worrying, isn't it? I take it that English is a second
language for you.

Thanks,Brian Goldsmith.

No problem, Brian. I'm sure it will be nice doing business with
you.



few = not many

whether he meant "very few" or "a few", probably makes no difference
in actual numbers, but just shows us that the poster has trouble
typing proper English.

Of course it would be a help if the poster could actually construct
his sentences properly,using correct syntax.
But then again on the internet bad english is common.
and of course bad manners is common as well.

Funny how people use bad language, when shown to be
wrong.

Please have the goodness to indicate the "bad manners" and the "bad
language" in any of the above. Could you also indicate how you
deduced that the poster was a "he". You may or may not be correct.
My interest is in the reasoning process. Thank you very much.

you were told in the previous post.If you still don't know what you're
doing wrong after you've been told what you were doing wrong, then you
have more than a mild syntax problem,but a basic comprehension problem
as well.
Click to expand...
Translation: I've put one foot in my mouth, and I don't know of the other
will fit, so I won't try 'cos I'm chicken.

The"he"context (in terms of using it as a collective noun)
is further proof of your lack of english language training.
Click to expand...
Of course, "he" is not, and never has been, a collective noun. But you knew
that.

You made no deduction, did you. It was just your customary and irrational
leap in the dark.

any more dumb questions after you've been told the answer and you
should seriously go back to remdial school.
Click to expand...
Since you have comprehensively demonstrated your inability to answer any
questions to support your maladroit claims, and your own ludicrous efforts
at punctuation and grammar is on public exhibition for all to see and marvel
at, you might yourself consider "remdial" school. Seriously.
 
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:55:07 +1100, "Galimatias"
<clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 20:40:27 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:47:43 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

Brian Goldsmith wrote:
"Galimatias" <clamour@incoherence.org

In the RW, we all get our share of annoyances, and most deal with
it in a fairly relaxed fashion. Usenet is no different, unless you
consider an annoyance in the form of abuse or other OT comment too
much to bear. There have been few people damaged by their active,
even vigorous, participation in NGs.

****Please elaborate on the last sentence.

More than happy to do so. Please put $200 in $5 notes into a plain
A4 envelope addressed to me and let me know when it is ready.

Did you mean there have
been a few people damaged or did you mean there have been very few
people damaged,the difference in meaning is great.

Yes. Worrying, isn't it? I take it that English is a second
language for you.

Thanks,Brian Goldsmith.

No problem, Brian. I'm sure it will be nice doing business with
you.



few = not many

whether he meant "very few" or "a few", probably makes no difference
in actual numbers, but just shows us that the poster has trouble
typing proper English.

Of course it would be a help if the poster could actually construct
his sentences properly,using correct syntax.
But then again on the internet bad english is common.
and of course bad manners is common as well.

Funny how people use bad language, when shown to be
wrong.

Please have the goodness to indicate the "bad manners" and the "bad
language" in any of the above. Could you also indicate how you
deduced that the poster was a "he". You may or may not be correct.
My interest is in the reasoning process. Thank you very much.

you were told in the previous post.If you still don't know what you're
doing wrong after you've been told what you were doing wrong, then you
have more than a mild syntax problem,but a basic comprehension problem
as well.

Translation: I've put one foot in my mouth, and I don't know of the other
will fit, so I won't try 'cos I'm chicken.

The"he"context (in terms of using it as a collective noun)
is further proof of your lack of english language training.

Of course, "he" is not, and never has been, a collective noun. But you knew
that.

You made no deduction, did you. It was just your customary and irrational
leap in the dark.

any more dumb questions after you've been told the answer and you
should seriously go back to remdial school.

Since you have comprehensively demonstrated your inability to answer any
questions to support your maladroit claims, and your own ludicrous efforts
at punctuation and grammar is on public exhibition for all to see and marvel
at, you might yourself consider "remdial" school. Seriously.
Click to expand...

The questions were answered .problem is you don't know english well
enough to understand them.

I bet you're the type of sick weirdo who calls God "Our mother".

go back to your porn sites....not to troll but to sell your wares.
 
<tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com> wrote in message
news:et59t0tc1n8vct9sbsslouo0ivgp6kh8tf@4ax.com...
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:55:07 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

I bet you're the type of sick weirdo who calls God "Our mother".

go back to your porn sites....not to troll but to sell your wares.
Click to expand...
Seriously now, you have been reading too many Phil Alison posts. No point
in removing one malcontent just to have some else jump in to replace him.
Or are *YOU* Phil?

Happy New Year, TT

PS "chill a little"
 
TT wrote:
tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com> wrote in message
news:et59t0tc1n8vct9sbsslouo0ivgp6kh8tf@4ax.com...
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:55:07 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

I bet you're the type of sick weirdo who calls God "Our mother".

go back to your porn sites....not to troll but to sell your wares.


Seriously now, you have been reading too many Phil Alison posts. No
point in removing one malcontent just to have some else jump in to
replace him. Or are *YOU* Phil?

Happy New Year, TT

PS "chill a little"
Click to expand...
The two bits you quote come from neither of the posters you mention. Are
you showing off?
 
Galimatias wrote:
TT wrote:
tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com> wrote in message
news:et59t0tc1n8vct9sbsslouo0ivgp6kh8tf@4ax.com...
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:55:07 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

I bet you're the type of sick weirdo who calls God "Our mother".

go back to your porn sites....not to troll but to sell your wares.


Seriously now, you have been reading too many Phil Alison posts. No
point in removing one malcontent just to have some else jump in to
replace him. Or are *YOU* Phil?

Happy New Year, TT

PS "chill a little"

The two bits you quote come from neither of the posters you mention.
Are you showing off?
Click to expand...
Apologies to TT for that last post of mine. Your post arrived before that
of "tryingtoworkout".

To "tryingtoworkout", you have lost that bet. I'll bet that you were
brought up as a Catholic. Now, how much is it that you owe me?
 
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:46:52 +1100, "Galimatias"
<clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

Galimatias wrote:
TT wrote:
tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com> wrote in message
news:et59t0tc1n8vct9sbsslouo0ivgp6kh8tf@4ax.com...
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:55:07 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

I bet you're the type of sick weirdo who calls God "Our mother".

go back to your porn sites....not to troll but to sell your wares.


Seriously now, you have been reading too many Phil Alison posts. No
point in removing one malcontent just to have some else jump in to
replace him. Or are *YOU* Phil?

Happy New Year, TT

PS "chill a little"

The two bits you quote come from neither of the posters you mention.
Are you showing off?

Apologies to TT for that last post of mine. Your post arrived before that
of "tryingtoworkout".

To "tryingtoworkout", you have lost that bet. I'll bet that you were
brought up as a Catholic. Now, how much is it that you owe me?
Click to expand...

any poster who starts a thread full of bullshit and crossposts it to
several groups is an internet whore.

got aids yet?

don't take any money from little kiddies now...
 
"Galimatias" <clamour@incoherence.org> wrote in message
news:1w3n1luwkr6leb8.311220041246@127.0.0.1...
Apologies to TT for that last post of mine. Your post arrived before that
of "tryingtoworkout".
Click to expand...
Don't you just hate that when it happens ;-)

I just believe adults can behave civilly and still strongly disagree with
one another with out having to resort to be a PA clone.

Cheers for that TT.
 
tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:46:52 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

Galimatias wrote:
TT wrote:
tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com> wrote in message
news:et59t0tc1n8vct9sbsslouo0ivgp6kh8tf@4ax.com...
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 10:55:07 +1100, "Galimatias"
clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

I bet you're the type of sick weirdo who calls God "Our mother".

go back to your porn sites....not to troll but to sell your wares.


Seriously now, you have been reading too many Phil Alison posts.
No point in removing one malcontent just to have some else jump in
to replace him. Or are *YOU* Phil?

Happy New Year, TT

PS "chill a little"

The two bits you quote come from neither of the posters you mention.
Are you showing off?

Apologies to TT for that last post of mine. Your post arrived
before that of "tryingtoworkout".

To "tryingtoworkout", you have lost that bet. I'll bet that you were
brought up as a Catholic. Now, how much is it that you owe me?

any poster who starts a thread full of bullshit and crossposts it to
several groups is an internet whore.
Click to expand...
Started which thread?
got aids yet?

don't take any money from little kiddies now...
Click to expand...
Try playing "Snap". See if you can take a trick. You'll have to play by
yourself, of course. But you'll be used to that.
 
<tryingtoworkout@badsyntaxcorner.com> wrote in message
news:q5d9t0d59v5qji6uiqmdhlsg62kp1msaac@4ax.com...
any poster who starts a thread full of bullshit and crossposts it to
several groups is an internet whore.

got aids yet?

don't take any money from little kiddies now...
Click to expand...
Looks like Phil, sounds like Phil, writes like Phil mmmmmmm...........? But
not Phil's computer and I don't think he has moved to somewhere around
Michigan either.

TT
 
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:27:12 +0800, "TT" <swatter@geo.net.au> wrote:

Looks like Phil, sounds like Phil, writes like Phil mmmmmmm...........? But
not Phil's computer and I don't think he has moved to somewhere around
Michigan either.
Click to expand...
Yes, the style is _so_ similar - I have always had strong
suspicions they were one and the same.

Mike Harding
 
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 02:25:09 +0800, "Clockmeister"
<no-one@nowhere.com> wrote:

Actually I'm going by my own experience. I've certainly been hurt by
things said on NGs (not this one--yet). Of course it depends on your
definition of "damaged". There are some pretty nasty, personal things
said on NGs, and not all can be forgotten or forgiven.

Too thin skinned? Probably.

Don't be such a fucking pussy you limp wristed twat.
Click to expand...
NOW you've hurt me! (sob)

PS I'm kidding :)
Click to expand...
Oh okay.... (phew)
 
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 09:39:14 +1100, "Galimatias"
<clamour@incoherence.org> wrote:

Well, since you have opened the door to your own experience, tell me if you
have not had your feelings hurt at every Christmas gathering you have ever
attended. (This is only for illustrative purposes.) Not too unusual an
occurrence. You didn't get the present you had hoped for, or someone got a
bigger piece of pudding, or there was a spat between some relos over nothing
at all really which put a damper on things for a while, and so on. That's
everyone's lot in life - a saga of hurt feelings, real and imagined. Of
course, this is relieved by the many episodes of sheer delight, as you might
also have experienced.
Click to expand...

Haven't experienced much of either actually. We just sit around eating
chocolate sultanas and Cheezels. And just occasionally, for
excitement, a licorice allsort.

Now, moving to Unsenet, there just is no comparison. As you say, you have
to be thin skinned to he hurt by anything done on a NG, however nasty or
personal it might be.
Click to expand...
Think so? Ha, you haven't been around.

It's not like being hit by a large wave, or a drunk
in a car, or losing a job.
Click to expand...
Never worry much about any of those things. My self-esteem remains the
same after all except possibly the last.

And you can always KF the offender, or
retaliate, or mock, or even walk away.
Click to expand...
You can, but it doesn't take back what's been said.

BTW, one case is not "few". Unless you have multiple personalities.
Click to expand...
I do, and they've all been severely wounded. (sniff)
 
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:27:12 +0800, "TT" <swatter@geo.net.au> wrote:


Looks like Phil, sounds like Phil, writes like Phil mmmmmmm...........? But
not Phil's computer and I don't think he has moved to somewhere around
Michigan either.
Click to expand...
Pity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top