Selectivity vs. sensitivity

On Sat, 9 Jun 2018, Phil Allison wrote:

jurb...@gmail.com wrote:


"Tuners that are beloved of the "FM DX" crowd will tend to have: "


I want one with continuously variable IF bandwidth on the front.



** Such a feature is useful with AM reception but not with broadcast FM.

The FM signal is inherently wide band, with +/-75 kHz deviation at peak
audio level - if the IF bandwidth is less than 150kHz, distorted sound
is the result.

I have a radio scanner ( AR 1000xlt ) with wide and narrow FM modes,
30kHz and 200kHz respectively. Listening to broadcast FM while in narrow
mode is *intolerable*, in wide mode it sounds just fine.
Continuously variable for FM doesn't make sense. But there have been some
FM tuners that could be switched between "wide" and "narrow", in relative
terms. So for strong signals, wider bandwidth is fine. But for weaker
signals, narrower bandwidth avoids interference from adjacent signals that
are stronger. It wasn't uncommon for FM DXers to swap the ceramic filters
in their FM receivers from the often 280KHz bandwidth to down about
180KHz, at one time one could go to a catalog and order Murata ceramic
filters in a range of bandwidths. If you don't need FM, you can get by
with narrower, though of course nt in the tens of KHz wide.

The scanner wants "narrow" for two way communication which is narrow
deviation, 10KHz or smaller in recent years. The wide is for broadcast FM
and maybe some other things, since yes, the "narrow" in this case is way
too narrow for FM broadcast. Of course, the wider bandwidth can be useful
for things like receiving weather satellites, which may have a wider
deviation of something like 40KHz, but also because of doppler shift, an
even wider bandwidth makes things easier. I know I've seen modifications
for scanners to use with weather satellites, and they bypass the narrow
filter at 455KHz, which leaves an FM broadcast band type ceramic filter at
the first IF of 10.7MHz.

There was a time twenty years ago when I was bringing home lots of Delco
car radios from garage sales. I'm not sure what the FM filter is in
there, but they certainly seemed to have better skirt selectivity than
other FM radios I'm familiar with. The AM filters seeemd sharper too.

Michael
 
On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 1:23:49 PM UTC-4, mako...@yahoo.com wrote:
for FM DX, you want a radio that you can switch to MONO mode.

mark

The GE "SuperRadio" comes immediately to mind.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
 
>"Continuously variable for FM doesn't make sense."

Maybe not, but...

In the old days there were stations that sounded better when off tuned, and I mean with the dual tuning meters. This can only be because the multipath was at the edge of the IF bandwidth and mistuning took it out of the passband. If so, the simple loss of the harmonics obviously caused less distortion than the multipath would.

Luxman believed it and had a ine for a few years that actually detected multipath and would actually mistune a station for lowest distortion based on the multipath measurement obviously.

Thus, even better would be variable control of both the upper and lower sidebands. this would allow you to tune in the center of the detector range and do what the Luxman did, or what mistuning did a long time ago. Adjusting it manually would be a different story of course, few people could figure it out.

However being in the center of the detector range is simply not important now that they usually have a much wider range than the IF bandwidth. The Luxman engineers probably figured that is would be pretty rare for the multipath to happen at both sidebands and figured that the easiest way to do it would be mistuning.

I have seen such a tuner in action. It would tune of course, then it went into the test type mode and you could see the tuning indicator change and there was another small indicator on there that I think indicated the detected multipath.

That was actually one of the best mix/match systems I heard. The Luxman was a receiver and fed a pair of ADS which had blown tweeters. The other amp fed a Bose Acoustimass system with the satellites right on top of the ADS'. And I could not get it to clip. I shook the floor pretty good, and the house was built on a slab. Longwood, Florida, every house is on a slab unless you are filthy rich and want to waste money. Certain times of the year if you stand in one spot out in the yard you start sinking, that is if the fire ants don't get to you and make you go in. Of course there was also the alligator in the swamp next door...

Anyway, I think DXing anything is not what it once was. All the digital garbage on the signal, you limit the IF bandwidth that is sure to cause some distortion. And even some of the best old tuners need a modification just to handle the signal without spurting a bunch of noise into it. As far as DXing TV which I used to do, that is over period. It seems like they don't want us watching things that are not meant for the area. Like Canadian news I used to watch on CFPL, channel 10. Now we have the internet and they are having a hard time stopping that. Ever look at RT ? Sure they are biased, but they are not off the wall. Even PressTV, biased ? Sure, but CNN ain't ? Bullshit.

And BTW, you can get most FM in the country on iheartradio.com I think, though it may have limitations applied. Like youtube "this video is not available in your country". But there are programs that can spoof your location. Consider them the new DX antennae.
 
On Fri, 08 Jun 2018 13:56:49 -0500, Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com>
wrote:

On Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:32:03 -0400, micky wrote:
I want a newer car radio for my 2005 Toyota Solara, and I live in
Baltimore and want to be able to receive WAMU, 88.5 and WCSP
(c-span)90.1, from DC.

If you are really IN Baltimore, there's no way you can get DC stations on
a car radio.

I beg to differ. WAMU and KCSP both considers Baltimore within their
coverage area:
<https://radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/patg?id=WAMU-FM>
<https://radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/patg?id=WCSP-FM>
It should be possible to hear both in Baltimore with a decent car
antenna and receiver.



--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top