P
Phil Hobbs
Guest
On 01/21/2017 04:41 PM, Robert Roland wrote:
I just posted this to the cadsoft forum (via Element14):
We have a three-seat license to Eagle 6 Pro, but with this latest snafu
we've switched to Diptrace. Wasn't that hard. (As a matter of fact we
made the decision at the time of the Autodesk purchase, because we were
pretty sure they'd do something like this. Otherwise we'd have bought
Eagle 7 Pro.)
Diptrace has ASCII import/export. It also supplies Eagle ULPs that
export Eagle schematics, boards, *and libraries*.
One drawback of Diptrace is that it isn't directly scriptable. We've
made a lot of Python scripts that hack up Diptrace's ASCII files, so
instead of running a ULP as in Eagle, you export stuff, run a Python
script on it, and import it again. The ULPs that Diptrace supplies are
good sample code for how to do that.
We thought of switching to KiCad, but our layout person much prefers
Diptrace.
So there's life after Eagle. A pity that Autodesk screwed the pooch
like this--we'd certainly have stayed with Eagle otherwise.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:06:54 -0500, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Sayonara, Eagle.
So, where do we go now?
I have already installed KiCad and have started reading the Getting
Started page.
Are there any other alternatives worth looking at in the KiCad price
range?
I just posted this to the cadsoft forum (via Element14):
We have a three-seat license to Eagle 6 Pro, but with this latest snafu
we've switched to Diptrace. Wasn't that hard. (As a matter of fact we
made the decision at the time of the Autodesk purchase, because we were
pretty sure they'd do something like this. Otherwise we'd have bought
Eagle 7 Pro.)
Diptrace has ASCII import/export. It also supplies Eagle ULPs that
export Eagle schematics, boards, *and libraries*.
One drawback of Diptrace is that it isn't directly scriptable. We've
made a lot of Python scripts that hack up Diptrace's ASCII files, so
instead of running a ULP as in Eagle, you export stuff, run a Python
script on it, and import it again. The ULPs that Diptrace supplies are
good sample code for how to do that.
We thought of switching to KiCad, but our layout person much prefers
Diptrace.
So there's life after Eagle. A pity that Autodesk screwed the pooch
like this--we'd certainly have stayed with Eagle otherwise.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net