Samsung and AT&T U-Verse HDMI error?

On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 08:25:29 -0800 (PST), Ron <BigELilE05@msn.com>
wrote:

On Dec 12, 12:55 am, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
Bah Humbug.  Only $229 for a 2 meter HDMI cable?  That's for
cheapskates.  Real audiophiles buy nothing but the best and most
expensive.
http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=AQHDMIDIA&variation=2
$1,394.75 for a 2 meter cable is more like it.  It comes with a 72VDC
bias to do something to prevent dielectric absorption which allegedly
causes distortion.  I like the "long-grain copper".  I didn't know
copper has grain.

Ah, so that is why I have distortion.
The only thing that's distorted is the price markup.
<http://www.audioquest.com>
It's also patented.
<http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=wix7AAAAEBAJ&dq=7,126,055>
The problem is that dielectric adsorption is a real effect:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric_absorption>
but is hardly applicable to PVC dielectric HDMI cables which has low
dielectric soaking effects. Of course, no numbers or test results can
be found anywhere.

Incidentally, note that there are different lengths and speeds for
various classes of HDMI cables:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hdmi#Cables>
I unsuccessfully tried to make a 100ft HDMI cable work for a customer.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top