D
Don Klipstein
Guest
In article <9jek40dggabd98d8k47nj5o20ovmpt4g2q@4ax.com>, DarkMatter wrote:
of the sqaure of flux, and that normally falls off faster than
inverse-square of distance from the source.
- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
But "pull" on small objects is the derivitive (with respect to position)On 4 Mar 2004 19:37:27 GMT, "Walter Harley"
walterh@cafewalterNOSPAM.com> Gave us:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote in
message news:bbre409vedrcika1fmv4cda081cqplbo5f@4ax.com...
The 1.4 megagauss number is absurd; kilogauss, maybe. I seriously
doubt the part about separating the iron out from one's blood, too;
superconductive MRI magnets are far more powerful than any PM can ever
be, and have no such problems.
They're also farther away. Inverse cube law, right?
No. Magnetic flux dissipates at the square of the distance.
of the sqaure of flux, and that normally falls off faster than
inverse-square of distance from the source.
- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)