J
Jonathan Kirwan
Guest
On Fri, 05 Aug 2005 18:30:50 GMT, Joerg
<notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote:
program called Cohesion Designer that uses/used a very similar set of
description lines to what LTSpice uses. And it wouldn't surprise me
to find that various Spice programs which support graphical schematic
capture using very similar ways of storing the schematics. But I've
no idea, at all.
I could certainly look at a few examples, though. Wouldn't hurt me
much to deal with slight differences, if I can identify them.
Regarding the symbol libraries, though, I'm currently not using
LTSpice's graphical symbol definitions because I haven't come up with
a way of rendering them in ASCII. So I need an ASCII library of
parts, anyway. I just support the basic ones, like capacitors,
diodes, resistors, coils, transistors, fets, etc. Discretes. IC
packages are simply missing, for example, but could be added on a
per-need basis.
I think I can work out a method for converting graphical package
descriptions into reasonable ASCII if I focus on rectangular images.
But that isn't done, yet.
In short, I need some input about prioritizing things and I need to
find a way of dealing with the more important/common needs. For now,
it's more something to illustrate a concept, with the accident that it
also has some modest utility.
Jon
<notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net> wrote:
It may be able to, though I've never tried. There seems to be aHello Jim,
Interesting. LTspice can actually read-in a PSpice Schematics. Now
all I need to figure out is how to import my PSpice symbols into
LTspice. I have tons that I've made up that don't exist in the
standard libraries.
Maybe Jon's program could also read PSpice schematics then. But even if
you could translate it all to LTSpice I guess you'd be restricted to
whatever symbols he's got in his conversion program or you would have to
create new ones.
program called Cohesion Designer that uses/used a very similar set of
description lines to what LTSpice uses. And it wouldn't surprise me
to find that various Spice programs which support graphical schematic
capture using very similar ways of storing the schematics. But I've
no idea, at all.
I could certainly look at a few examples, though. Wouldn't hurt me
much to deal with slight differences, if I can identify them.
Regarding the symbol libraries, though, I'm currently not using
LTSpice's graphical symbol definitions because I haven't come up with
a way of rendering them in ASCII. So I need an ASCII library of
parts, anyway. I just support the basic ones, like capacitors,
diodes, resistors, coils, transistors, fets, etc. Discretes. IC
packages are simply missing, for example, but could be added on a
per-need basis.
I think I can work out a method for converting graphical package
descriptions into reasonable ASCII if I focus on rectangular images.
But that isn't done, yet.
In short, I need some input about prioritizing things and I need to
find a way of dealing with the more important/common needs. For now,
it's more something to illustrate a concept, with the accident that it
also has some modest utility.
Jon