J
John Miles, KE5FX
Guest
On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 11:12:12 AM UTC-8, John Larkin wrote:
I'm working on a box right now that uses a 250W redundant ATX supply
(at the customer's request):
https://www.surestar.com.tw/product/47
My application only needs +12V, and when I took one of the PSUs apart for
evaluation, I saw that only the low-current +5 standby and +12 rails are
actually generated by the ATX supplies. +5, -12, and +3.3 are generated
from +12 by outboard regulators on a separate board.
What's frustrating is that while this particular supply works just fine
with no load on any of the rails, the manual calls for 1A minimum loads
on +3.3, +5, and +12, and 500 mA on +5 standby.
This is for $$$, not a homebrew hack, so I have no choice but to follow
the manufacturer's specs and bolt three big resistors to the chassis to
burn almost 10W for no reason.
The other weird thing about redundant power supplies is that there is no way
for the supply to signal that one of the supplies has failed. There's a
loud alarm buzzer, of course, and LEDs to indicate the status of both
supplies, but the power-good signal stays high when you unplug one of them,
and the server motherboard has no way to know anything is amiss.
So I did hack it to the extent of replacing the status LEDs with connections
to the controller. I feel like I'm overlooking something obvious here,
because most of these supplies end up in data center racks that are hundreds
of yards away from the nearest human. Do Google and Amazon just send
somebody down the aisles every so often to listen for buzzers...?
-- john, KE5FX
Do PC supplies do some sort of averaged or compromise or nonlinear
feedback?
I'm working on a box right now that uses a 250W redundant ATX supply
(at the customer's request):
https://www.surestar.com.tw/product/47
My application only needs +12V, and when I took one of the PSUs apart for
evaluation, I saw that only the low-current +5 standby and +12 rails are
actually generated by the ATX supplies. +5, -12, and +3.3 are generated
from +12 by outboard regulators on a separate board.
What's frustrating is that while this particular supply works just fine
with no load on any of the rails, the manual calls for 1A minimum loads
on +3.3, +5, and +12, and 500 mA on +5 standby.
This is for $$$, not a homebrew hack, so I have no choice but to follow
the manufacturer's specs and bolt three big resistors to the chassis to
burn almost 10W for no reason.
The other weird thing about redundant power supplies is that there is no way
for the supply to signal that one of the supplies has failed. There's a
loud alarm buzzer, of course, and LEDs to indicate the status of both
supplies, but the power-good signal stays high when you unplug one of them,
and the server motherboard has no way to know anything is amiss.
So I did hack it to the extent of replacing the status LEDs with connections
to the controller. I feel like I'm overlooking something obvious here,
because most of these supplies end up in data center racks that are hundreds
of yards away from the nearest human. Do Google and Amazon just send
somebody down the aisles every so often to listen for buzzers...?
-- john, KE5FX