K
ke...@kjwdesigns.com
Guest
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 13:15:41 UTC-7, dcaster@krl.org wrote:
....
> I was thinking a lot more power. Say 2 kw peak power and parked at work for 8.5 hours. So maybe 8 kwh. or 10 times your estimate. So maybe a $600 a year Not really worth while at this time. Maybe reasonable ten years from now.
2kW peak might need ~140 sq feet of panels. That\'s much more than the available space on a car. Add in the loss due to unfavourable aspect most of the time or shading due to clouds etc and you will need even more area.
The weight of the panels and the compromises to aerodynamics may reduce efficiency to the point that they are a net loss.
Most cars are not comprised of flat surfaces.
kw
....
> I was thinking a lot more power. Say 2 kw peak power and parked at work for 8.5 hours. So maybe 8 kwh. or 10 times your estimate. So maybe a $600 a year Not really worth while at this time. Maybe reasonable ten years from now.
2kW peak might need ~140 sq feet of panels. That\'s much more than the available space on a car. Add in the loss due to unfavourable aspect most of the time or shading due to clouds etc and you will need even more area.
The weight of the panels and the compromises to aerodynamics may reduce efficiency to the point that they are a net loss.
Why do you say it would have to be flexible panels?
Most cars are not comprised of flat surfaces.
kw