Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a46d31$0$44199$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"felix_unger" <me@nothere.biz> wrote in message
news:d0hnsjFj0fqU1@mid.individual.net...
On 12-July-2015 6:08 PM, F Murtz wrote:
Frank Slootweg wrote:
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the
ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare or
non
existing hearsay examples
In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone
proves
the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case
where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!", because
you
have your eyes closed.
If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my
exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.
Or you can make it really simple and just search for his
postings
with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That
should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(
The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes some of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of
the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting
mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had your
eyes
closed. Period.
OTOH, to be fair, Roddles has his spurious good moments, with
good
discussion/contribution. One such episode was just recently in
another
group (which I won't mention to protect its audience, and no, I
wasn't
involved, just watching). So there you go.
And have you noticed that in the main the good discussions are with
sensible people?
no, only with ppl who wont disagree with him, and kiss asses.
And we're having the best kiss ass Rod has ever created out his poop.
Mr. F. Murf.
you have to treat him with kid gloves if you want any semblance of a
sensible discussion, and never contradict him. little children are
better
behaved. here's a little exercise for you.. try and find any
discussion
where he has behaved like a normal, sensible, mature adult, and
treated
ppl cordially and with respect.
You have a better chance finding Rod's dad alive.
He killed himself knowing what his son was growing up to be.
More unsubstantiated cods wallop which you are in no position to know,
You and many others just spread such tripe as if it is fact just proving
your opinion
See?! That's why I know for sure your head is stuck up his arse.
keep it up, you are only proving your shortcomings
And any educated person would know what to make of your literary"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a6603e$0$9875$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a46ff3$0$41695$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a25866$0$19793$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a1da09$0$56385$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com...
Frank Slootweg wrote:
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the
ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare or
non
existing hearsay examples
In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone
proves
the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case
where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!",
because
you
have your eyes closed.
If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my
exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.
Or you can make it really simple and just search for his
postings
with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That
should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(
The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes some
of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of
the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting
mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had your
eyes
closed. Period.
Yes I have seen all that,but it does not make him wrong just because
someone disputes his statements.
It does make you wrong. 'cos you are poop came out of him. So, you do
need
to find your own answers in
the cyberspace.
Are you on some sort of drug, as your posts are a bit incompressible?
I think you're on backyard booze, 'cos you're talking about compressing
my
posts.
Read this,
https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/26421982/perth-man-in-big-backyard-booze-bust/
Start buying your booze, the walk to the supermarket and walk back home
is
good for you,
and prevents you from overdoing it.
You will also be helping the governement and those hardworking, poor
booze
companies.
Now you are propagating bullshit about me. Are you hoping that it will
enter folklore. Now I know that you are a bullshit artist that spreads
lies And I am in a position to know things that refer directly to me,(I
do
not drink,
Yes, you do. You're unloading your baggage here due to excessive drinking
of
that cheap backyard stuff.
It messes with your head. I've warned your mate long time ago, and I'm
warning you now, quit the shit.
Start collecting stamps or something, it's a better and more productive
hobby than drinking.
I have never met rod).
That's another lie. You don't need to.
You're joined at hips with Rod fella.
There are to many people like you that take a personal dislike to
someone(not necessarily rod) and invent so called facts based on no
evidence just to vent your spleen.
Well, I certainly dislike you being a poop of Rod. Only Rod can fix that.
count.
And you, being a creation out of Rod poop.
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a65f98$0$9875$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a46d31$0$44199$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"felix_unger" <me@nothere.biz> wrote in message
news:d0hnsjFj0fqU1@mid.individual.net...
On 12-July-2015 6:08 PM, F Murtz wrote:
Frank Slootweg wrote:
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the
ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare or
non
existing hearsay examples
In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone
proves
the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case
where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!", because
you
have your eyes closed.
If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my
exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.
Or you can make it really simple and just search for his
postings
with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That
should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(
The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes some of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of
the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting
mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had your
eyes
closed. Period.
OTOH, to be fair, Roddles has his spurious good moments, with
good
discussion/contribution. One such episode was just recently in
another
group (which I won't mention to protect its audience, and no, I
wasn't
involved, just watching). So there you go.
And have you noticed that in the main the good discussions are with
sensible people?
no, only with ppl who wont disagree with him, and kiss asses.
And we're having the best kiss ass Rod has ever created out his poop.
Mr. F. Murf.
you have to treat him with kid gloves if you want any semblance of a
sensible discussion, and never contradict him. little children are
better
behaved. here's a little exercise for you.. try and find any
discussion
where he has behaved like a normal, sensible, mature adult, and
treated
ppl cordially and with respect.
You have a better chance finding Rod's dad alive.
He killed himself knowing what his son was growing up to be.
More unsubstantiated cods wallop which you are in no position to know,
You and many others just spread such tripe as if it is fact just proving
your opinion
See?! That's why I know for sure your head is stuck up his arse.
And your, Rod's poop!
Keep it up, the last vestige of your sanity is becoming irretrievably lost.
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a6603e$0$9875$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a46ff3$0$41695$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a25866$0$19793$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a1da09$0$56385$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com...
Frank Slootweg wrote:
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are
the
ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare
or
non
existing hearsay examples
In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone
proves
the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case
where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!",
because
you
have your eyes closed.
If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my
exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.
Or you can make it really simple and just search for his
postings
with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That
should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(
The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes
some
of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of
the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting
mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had
your
eyes
closed. Period.
Yes I have seen all that,but it does not make him wrong just
because
someone disputes his statements.
It does make you wrong. 'cos you are poop came out of him. So, you
do
need
to find your own answers in
the cyberspace.
Are you on some sort of drug, as your posts are a bit
incompressible?
I think you're on backyard booze, 'cos you're talking about
compressing
my
posts.
Read this,
https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/26421982/perth-man-in-big-backyard-booze-bust/
Start buying your booze, the walk to the supermarket and walk back
home
is
good for you,
and prevents you from overdoing it.
You will also be helping the governement and those hardworking, poor
booze
companies.
Now you are propagating bullshit about me. Are you hoping that it will
enter folklore. Now I know that you are a bullshit artist that spreads
lies And I am in a position to know things that refer directly to
me,(I
do
not drink,
Yes, you do. You're unloading your baggage here due to excessive
drinking
of
that cheap backyard stuff.
It messes with your head. I've warned your mate long time ago, and I'm
warning you now, quit the shit.
Start collecting stamps or something, it's a better and more productive
hobby than drinking.
I have never met rod).
That's another lie. You don't need to.
You're joined at hips with Rod fella.
There are to many people like you that take a personal dislike to
someone(not necessarily rod) and invent so called facts based on no
evidence just to vent your spleen.
Well, I certainly dislike you being a poop of Rod. Only Rod can fix
that.
count.
And you, being a creation out of Rod poop.
And any educated person would know what to make of your literary
inventions
Have seen all that,(where is the proof in any of it) and it just
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a6603e$0$9875$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a46ff3$0$41695$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a25866$0$19793$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a1da09$0$56385$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com...
Frank Slootweg wrote:
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are
the
ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare
or
non
existing hearsay examples
In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone
proves
the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case
where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!",
because
you
have your eyes closed.
If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my
exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.
Or you can make it really simple and just search for his
postings
with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That
should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(
The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes
some
of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of
the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting
mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had
your
eyes
closed. Period.
Yes I have seen all that,but it does not make him wrong just
because
someone disputes his statements.
It does make you wrong. 'cos you are poop came out of him. So, you
do
need
to find your own answers in
the cyberspace.
Are you on some sort of drug, as your posts are a bit
incompressible?
I think you're on backyard booze, 'cos you're talking about
compressing
my
posts.
Read this,
https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/26421982/perth-man-in-big-backyard-booze-bust/
Start buying your booze, the walk to the supermarket and walk back
home
is
good for you,
and prevents you from overdoing it.
You will also be helping the governement and those hardworking, poor
booze
companies.
Now you are propagating bullshit about me. Are you hoping that it will
enter folklore. Now I know that you are a bullshit artist that spreads
lies And I am in a position to know things that refer directly to
me,(I
do
not drink,
Yes, you do. You're unloading your baggage here due to excessive
drinking
of
that cheap backyard stuff.
It messes with your head. I've warned your mate long time ago, and I'm
warning you now, quit the shit.
Start collecting stamps or something, it's a better and more productive
hobby than drinking.
I have never met rod).
That's another lie. You don't need to.
You're joined at hips with Rod fella.
There are to many people like you that take a personal dislike to
someone(not necessarily rod) and invent so called facts based on no
evidence just to vent your spleen.
Well, I certainly dislike you being a poop of Rod. Only Rod can fix
that.
count.
And you, being a creation out of Rod poop.
And any educated person would know what to make of your literary
inventions
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a7a067$0$44430$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a6603e$0$9875$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a46ff3$0$41695$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a25866$0$19793$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a1da09$0$56385$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com...
Frank Slootweg wrote:
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are
the
ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare
or
non
existing hearsay examples
In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that
someone
proves
the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case
where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!",
because
you
have your eyes closed.
If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my
exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.
Or you can make it really simple and just search for his
postings
with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That
should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(
The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes
some
of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most
of
the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting
mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had
your
eyes
closed. Period.
Yes I have seen all that,but it does not make him wrong just
because
someone disputes his statements.
It does make you wrong. 'cos you are poop came out of him. So, you
do
need
to find your own answers in
the cyberspace.
Are you on some sort of drug, as your posts are a bit
incompressible?
I think you're on backyard booze, 'cos you're talking about
compressing
my
posts.
Read this,
https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/26421982/perth-man-in-big-backyard-booze-bust/
Start buying your booze, the walk to the supermarket and walk back
home
is
good for you,
and prevents you from overdoing it.
You will also be helping the governement and those hardworking, poor
booze
companies.
Now you are propagating bullshit about me. Are you hoping that it
will
enter folklore. Now I know that you are a bullshit artist that
spreads
lies And I am in a position to know things that refer directly to
me,(I
do
not drink,
Yes, you do. You're unloading your baggage here due to excessive
drinking
of
that cheap backyard stuff.
It messes with your head. I've warned your mate long time ago, and I'm
warning you now, quit the shit.
Start collecting stamps or something, it's a better and more
productive
hobby than drinking.
I have never met rod).
That's another lie. You don't need to.
You're joined at hips with Rod fella.
There are to many people like you that take a personal dislike to
someone(not necessarily rod) and invent so called facts based on no
evidence just to vent your spleen.
Well, I certainly dislike you being a poop of Rod. Only Rod can fix
that.
count.
And you, being a creation out of Rod poop.
And any educated person would know what to make of your literary
inventions
And that Freud fella is pissing himself laughing in his grave.
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a65f98$0$9875$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a46d31$0$44199$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"felix_unger" <me@nothere.biz> wrote in message
news:d0hnsjFj0fqU1@mid.individual.net...
On 12-July-2015 6:08 PM, F Murtz wrote:
Frank Slootweg wrote:
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the
ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare
or
non
existing hearsay examples
In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone
proves
the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case
where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!",
because
you
have your eyes closed.
If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my
exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.
Or you can make it really simple and just search for his
postings
with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That
should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(
The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes some
of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of
the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting
mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had
your
eyes
closed. Period.
OTOH, to be fair, Roddles has his spurious good moments,
with
good
discussion/contribution. One such episode was just recently in
another
group (which I won't mention to protect its audience, and no, I
wasn't
involved, just watching). So there you go.
And have you noticed that in the main the good discussions are with
sensible people?
no, only with ppl who wont disagree with him, and kiss asses.
And we're having the best kiss ass Rod has ever created out his poop.
Mr. F. Murf.
you have to treat him with kid gloves if you want any semblance of a
sensible discussion, and never contradict him. little children are
better
behaved. here's a little exercise for you.. try and find any
discussion
where he has behaved like a normal, sensible, mature adult, and
treated
ppl cordially and with respect.
You have a better chance finding Rod's dad alive.
He killed himself knowing what his son was growing up to be.
More unsubstantiated cods wallop which you are in no position to know,
You and many others just spread such tripe as if it is fact just
proving
your opinion
See?! That's why I know for sure your head is stuck up his arse.
And your, Rod's poop!
Keep it up, the last vestige of your sanity is becoming irretrievably
lost.
It is also glaringly obvious that you have not one vestige of proof on any
of your utterances referring to mr speed.(or me)
I do not know whether you realize the harm you are doing to the"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a7a1c8$0$20152$c3e8da3$1cbc7475@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a65f98$0$9875$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a46d31$0$44199$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"felix_unger" <me@nothere.biz> wrote in message
news:d0hnsjFj0fqU1@mid.individual.net...
On 12-July-2015 6:08 PM, F Murtz wrote:
Frank Slootweg wrote:
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the
ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare
or
non
existing hearsay examples
In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone
proves
the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case
where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!",
because
you
have your eyes closed.
If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my
exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.
Or you can make it really simple and just search for his
postings
with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That
should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(
The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes some
of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of
the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting
mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had
your
eyes
closed. Period.
OTOH, to be fair, Roddles has his spurious good moments,
with
good
discussion/contribution. One such episode was just recently in
another
group (which I won't mention to protect its audience, and no, I
wasn't
involved, just watching). So there you go.
And have you noticed that in the main the good discussions are with
sensible people?
no, only with ppl who wont disagree with him, and kiss asses.
And we're having the best kiss ass Rod has ever created out his poop.
Mr. F. Murf.
you have to treat him with kid gloves if you want any semblance of a
sensible discussion, and never contradict him. little children are
better
behaved. here's a little exercise for you.. try and find any
discussion
where he has behaved like a normal, sensible, mature adult, and
treated
ppl cordially and with respect.
You have a better chance finding Rod's dad alive.
He killed himself knowing what his son was growing up to be.
More unsubstantiated cods wallop which you are in no position to know,
You and many others just spread such tripe as if it is fact just
proving
your opinion
See?! That's why I know for sure your head is stuck up his arse.
And your, Rod's poop!
Keep it up, the last vestige of your sanity is becoming irretrievably
lost.
It is also glaringly obvious that you have not one vestige of proof on any
of your utterances referring to mr speed.(or me)
I have one proof., Rod shitted you at a time he was having booze related
hemorrhoids, and you're still attached to his butt.
How do I know, I can smell you from this distance, 'cos I know that horrible
smell of Rod's from distance, from his writing.
There's my proof. You stink man.
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a7a1c8$0$20152$c3e8da3$1cbc7475@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a65f98$0$9875$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a46d31$0$44199$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"felix_unger" <me@nothere.biz> wrote in message
news:d0hnsjFj0fqU1@mid.individual.net...
On 12-July-2015 6:08 PM, F Murtz wrote:
Frank Slootweg wrote:
F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are
the
ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare
or
non
existing hearsay examples
In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that
someone
proves
the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case
where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!",
because
you
have your eyes closed.
If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my
exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.
Or you can make it really simple and just search for his
postings
with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That
should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(
The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes
some
of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most
of
the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting
mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had
your
eyes
closed. Period.
OTOH, to be fair, Roddles has his spurious good moments,
with
good
discussion/contribution. One such episode was just recently in
another
group (which I won't mention to protect its audience, and no, I
wasn't
involved, just watching). So there you go.
And have you noticed that in the main the good discussions are
with
sensible people?
no, only with ppl who wont disagree with him, and kiss asses.
And we're having the best kiss ass Rod has ever created out his
poop.
Mr. F. Murf.
you have to treat him with kid gloves if you want any semblance of
a
sensible discussion, and never contradict him. little children are
better
behaved. here's a little exercise for you.. try and find any
discussion
where he has behaved like a normal, sensible, mature adult, and
treated
ppl cordially and with respect.
You have a better chance finding Rod's dad alive.
He killed himself knowing what his son was growing up to be.
More unsubstantiated cods wallop which you are in no position to
know,
You and many others just spread such tripe as if it is fact just
proving
your opinion
See?! That's why I know for sure your head is stuck up his arse.
And your, Rod's poop!
Keep it up, the last vestige of your sanity is becoming irretrievably
lost.
It is also glaringly obvious that you have not one vestige of proof on
any
of your utterances referring to mr speed.(or me)
I have one proof., Rod shitted you at a time he was having booze related
hemorrhoids, and you're still attached to his butt.
How do I know, I can smell you from this distance, 'cos I know that
horrible
smell of Rod's from distance, from his writing.
There's my proof. You stink man.
I do not know whether you realize the harm you are doing to the perception
of your frailties with the posting public with your obviously untrue prose
it is a pity really.