A
atec77
Guest
On 5/10/2011 5:43 PM, kreed wrote:
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
K
kreed
Guest
On Oct 5, 9:31 pm, atec77 <ate...@hotmail.com> wrote:
No wonder he is so Pro- AGW - especially if his missus works there.
There are probably substantial public service incomes and benefits
coming into many households from departments like this, creating lots
of people living it up at the taxpayers expense and with the AGW
theories disintegrating in the eyes of the public, this probably
puts a lot of cushy jobs at risk, not to mention the credibility that
the CSIRO.previously had.
Anyone who wanted to gut it of these "climate scientists" and funding
generally would probably get a lot of political mileage from it.
If the credibility of the place was severely damaged by associating
itself with AGW, a lot of scientists in other parts of it would
probably cop flack over it too for having worked there, even if they
had nothing to do with AGW "research" which could hurt their future
job prospects.
Fair enough though I say, they thought it was a good joke to condone
ripping off the Australian public with a carbon tax, lets see how they
like being on the receiving end.
karma is a bitch.
This explains the obsession with:
-Abbott (who is a potential threat to this "AGW research" gravy train
- with the blessings of the public - if elected).
-Anyone who has a voice in the anti-AGW forum who is in any way
religious, and might therefore be serious about core christian values,
you know, ones like: "thou shalt not steal" (the taxpayers money - and
abuse the public in return) and "thou shalt not bear false witness".
Many would be happy to publicly expose those who blatantly behave in
any way contrary to these commandments, specially when a significant
proportion of their entire nation is threatened by it
This is my honest opinion anyway, for what its worth.
That sounds like Trev
No wonder he is so Pro- AGW - especially if his missus works there.
There are probably substantial public service incomes and benefits
coming into many households from departments like this, creating lots
of people living it up at the taxpayers expense and with the AGW
theories disintegrating in the eyes of the public, this probably
puts a lot of cushy jobs at risk, not to mention the credibility that
the CSIRO.previously had.
Anyone who wanted to gut it of these "climate scientists" and funding
generally would probably get a lot of political mileage from it.
If the credibility of the place was severely damaged by associating
itself with AGW, a lot of scientists in other parts of it would
probably cop flack over it too for having worked there, even if they
had nothing to do with AGW "research" which could hurt their future
job prospects.
Fair enough though I say, they thought it was a good joke to condone
ripping off the Australian public with a carbon tax, lets see how they
like being on the receiving end.
karma is a bitch.
This explains the obsession with:
-Abbott (who is a potential threat to this "AGW research" gravy train
- with the blessings of the public - if elected).
-Anyone who has a voice in the anti-AGW forum who is in any way
religious, and might therefore be serious about core christian values,
you know, ones like: "thou shalt not steal" (the taxpayers money - and
abuse the public in return) and "thou shalt not bear false witness".
Many would be happy to publicly expose those who blatantly behave in
any way contrary to these commandments, specially when a significant
proportion of their entire nation is threatened by it
This is my honest opinion anyway, for what its worth.
F
F Murtz
Guest
Paulie wrote:
Phill has a lot of useful advice, the problem is getting it without the
invective.
Phill has a lot of useful advice, the problem is getting it without the
invective.
R
Rheilly Phoull
Guest
On 10/7/2011 3:39 PM, F Murtz wrote:
Rheilly
Just listen to the core advice, the guy has life experience !!
Rheilly
A
atec77
Guest
On 7/10/2011 9:03 PM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
something
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
J
Jeßus
Guest
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 21:24:48 +1000, atec77 <atec77@hotmail.com> wrote:
You have a one track mind.
Don't ever try to claim you're not obsessed with arses and cocks Baz.
You have a one track mind.
J
John-Melb
Guest
On Nov 2, 8:31 am, atec77 <ate...@hotmail.com> wrote:
individuals who doesn't have a problem with Trevor posting his anti-
gun and anti-gunowner drivel on places like aus.electronics, but gets
very upset and starts his childish name-calling as soon as an
alternative viewpoint appears. Keefy's one of those all to common
types who believes freedom of speech is dependant on whether or not he
approves of what you're saying.
Keefy's previously admitted, he only posts here to annoy the crap out
of me, the funny thing is, I don't care.
Dorothy might be one of Keefy's sock-puppets however.
No, Keefy's not a sock puppet, Keefy's one of those charming anti-gun
individuals who doesn't have a problem with Trevor posting his anti-
gun and anti-gunowner drivel on places like aus.electronics, but gets
very upset and starts his childish name-calling as soon as an
alternative viewpoint appears. Keefy's one of those all to common
types who believes freedom of speech is dependant on whether or not he
approves of what you're saying.
Keefy's previously admitted, he only posts here to annoy the crap out
of me, the funny thing is, I don't care.
Dorothy might be one of Keefy's sock-puppets however.
J
John-Melb
Guest
On Nov 2, 12:47 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
I'm sure that Trevor finds you personality to be pleasant.
J
John-Melb
Guest
On Nov 2, 12:44 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Just knew I'd get a bite.............
J
John-Melb
Guest
On Nov 2, 12:47 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
I'm sure that Trevor finds your personality to be pleasant.
K
kreed
Guest
On Nov 2, 10:28 am, John-Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
that he is disturbed IMHO
Seems that his missus allegedly works in the
CSIRO, if so they want the climate fraud perpetuated, so she can keep
the $$ rolling in.
Try the global warming garbage that trevvy spews out, and you can see
that he is disturbed IMHO
Seems that his missus allegedly works in the
CSIRO, if so they want the climate fraud perpetuated, so she can keep
the $$ rolling in.
T
Trevor Wilson
Guest
On 11/2/2011 10:28 PM, kreed wrote:
peer-reviewed science that refutes what the following reputable
scientific organisations tell us and we'll take notice of you:
* IPCC
* CSIRO
* NASA
* BoM
* UK Met
* US EPA
* Australian Academy of Science
* US Academy of Science
* German Academy of Science
* French Academy of Science
* Etc
Clear? Submit your peer-reviewed science that shows all these
organisations to be wrong. We'll wait.
, and you can see
tell us about the climate, as opposed to what Alan Jones, Tony Abbott,
George Pell and Christopher Monckton claim? Is that your contention? Let
me see if I understand you:
You are claiming that, because I accept that what all the climatologists
and reputable scientists say is a highly likely probabililty (that AGW
is a fact) and that I reject what a bunch of religious loons and
talk-back radio hosts say is untrue, that _I_ am disturbed?
Curious.
Dunno about you, but the religious nutters and poofter radio hosts can
stick their opinions up their over-stretched arseholes. I'll pay
attention to the guys who study the subject.
tip: If you can't get your facts straight and if you can't present any
science to back your claims, then keep your stupid mouth shut.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
**"Garbage"? Try: SCIENCE. However, I'll play your game. YOU submit your
peer-reviewed science that refutes what the following reputable
scientific organisations tell us and we'll take notice of you:
* IPCC
* CSIRO
* NASA
* BoM
* UK Met
* US EPA
* Australian Academy of Science
* US Academy of Science
* German Academy of Science
* French Academy of Science
* Etc
Clear? Submit your peer-reviewed science that shows all these
organisations to be wrong. We'll wait.
, and you can see
**"Disturbed", in the sense that I trust what all the climatologists
tell us about the climate, as opposed to what Alan Jones, Tony Abbott,
George Pell and Christopher Monckton claim? Is that your contention? Let
me see if I understand you:
You are claiming that, because I accept that what all the climatologists
and reputable scientists say is a highly likely probabililty (that AGW
is a fact) and that I reject what a bunch of religious loons and
talk-back radio hosts say is untrue, that _I_ am disturbed?
Curious.
Dunno about you, but the religious nutters and poofter radio hosts can
stick their opinions up their over-stretched arseholes. I'll pay
attention to the guys who study the subject.
**It seems that it is you who is disturbed. And wrong, BTW. Here's a
tip: If you can't get your facts straight and if you can't present any
science to back your claims, then keep your stupid mouth shut.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
T
terryc
Guest
Trevor Wilson wrote:
Do us all a favour and cut this group out of your replies please.
Which is? Responding to cross posting trolls?
Do us all a favour and cut this group out of your replies please.
T
Trevor Wilson
Guest
On 11/3/2011 11:11 AM, terryc wrote:
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
**Sorry about that. I missed the crosspost.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
J
John-Melb
Guest
On Nov 3, 7:17 am, Trevor Wilson <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:
For those unfamiliar with Trevor Tosspots "debating" style, Trevor
quoting "alphabet soup" agencies who support his position is a clear
indication that Trevor has been soundly spanked and is simply lying to
try and save face.
Hey Trevor, remind us again, exactly where on the FBI website do we
find the FBI-UCR for the years 1976-86?
While you're at it, tell us again about your friend who can STOP his
heart?
wrote:
For those unfamiliar with Trevor Tosspots "debating" style, Trevor
quoting "alphabet soup" agencies who support his position is a clear
indication that Trevor has been soundly spanked and is simply lying to
try and save face.
Hey Trevor, remind us again, exactly where on the FBI website do we
find the FBI-UCR for the years 1976-86?
While you're at it, tell us again about your friend who can STOP his
heart?
K
kreed
Guest
On Nov 3, 12:58 pm, John-Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yep - that's about how it happened
LOL
J
John - Melb
Guest
On Nov 3, 11:11 am, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:
No one on aus.electronics had an issue with Trevor posting his off-
topic anti-gun and anti-gun owner rants on aus.electronics, but get
upset at the thought of alternative viewpoint appearing.
You don't like me playing in your wading pool, but don't have an issue
with Keefy posting his crap on aus.politics.guns solely to "annoy the
crap" out of me?
Fascinating............
I see the attitude around here remains unchanged.
No one on aus.electronics had an issue with Trevor posting his off-
topic anti-gun and anti-gun owner rants on aus.electronics, but get
upset at the thought of alternative viewpoint appearing.
You don't like me playing in your wading pool, but don't have an issue
with Keefy posting his crap on aus.politics.guns solely to "annoy the
crap" out of me?
Fascinating............