Power Supply Rectification and Smoothing

On 22 Oct 2007 10:52:15 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
wrote:

spamfree@spam.heaven wrote:

I don't understand this message, Daniel.

How could you. You miss the missing link :)
<snip incoherent gibberish>

Oh well, I tried to help, Manuel, sorry, Daniel.
If you choose to remain incoherent, that's your choice.
I will ignore you in future, goodbye, jack

"My name is Manuel, I come from Barcelona, I speak Eeenglish"
 
spamfree@spam.heaven wrote:

I don't understand this message, Daniel.
How could you. You miss the missing link :)

May I offer a few words of advice?
First up, be careful with capitalisation. English native speakers can
get away with ignoring it, but like using much idiom, you should aim
for simple, correctly expressed language. Avoid much idiom and the
jokes of the native speaker until you are much more proficient with
English.
I have no need to follow the same complex you have, as a not English
native speaker. I can understand Latin much better than you.

Yes yes. Like ppl here, trying to express (correctER's) special German.
:)))) Just to be like that grumpy Germans (wish to be rather the race,
not the language, indeed), who, science told, couldn't speak
(articulate) so well in the past (~20-40000 Years before now), but
being an totally other tribe than they, actually.

Interesting but true. Maybe your childs, if born in the U.K., would
know English. You do not.

Be careful with punctuation. My "rule" for commas is "when the reading
of the text requires a pause, insert a comma".
You are in a coma, yes.

Your pithy comment above, has no comma, and so would be read as:

"[J]ust count Moron. (whatever "Morons" are with a capital.)
In other words, "Do nothing else except count the number of Morons."

just count

If you were trying to call me a moron, and trying to tell me to count
(something) then you should have written "Just count, moron."
You could even capitalise the moron then, for emphasis.
Moron is nothing bad. Why do you elaborate so much about?
The Borders to the real Moron are near here...

Don't become boring. You can't impress me.

You see, the verb "count" can be either transitive or intransitive,
and you have not made it clear which you mean.
No, not Count, the Capital Word (e.g. Count Duukku in Star Wars).
Count, like counting. 1234

Do you come from Austria? Your native tongue would perhaps be German,
or the Austrian version thereof?
Can you be quiet. I have mentioned that before. Don't step in the same
complex as some Austrians do, thinking they are Neanderthaler and
Heidelbergensis. Haha .)))) And what are you? English? But just in the
meaning of the word 'english'.... You can't expect an angle, IMHO.

German syntax is a little different to English, and what you appear to
be doing, is perhaps using German syntax with a rather limited, but
often inappropriate choice of English vocabulary.

HTH, jack
Be quiet. Knowing good German is knowing well English. You are stupido.
Don't make me laugh..... best written English is read by me, as I would
write it to English, but.



Best regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
On 22 Oct 2007 10:31:45 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
wrote:

spamfree@spam.heaven wrote:

On 21 Oct 2007 23:22:53 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at
wrote:

John Fields wrote:

Mandic seems to think of himself as a sagacious dispenser of
obscure >> folksy wisdom and witticisms. Unfortunately, his
neophytic command >> of written English often reduces his otherwise
banal "edicts" to >> gibberish.


What a puffy text.

You can't believe that for yourself!?

You would do well to study this excellent English text, Daniel.
It could help you to express what you mean. So far, your choice of
words and syntax has indeed rendered most of your messages as
giibberish.

jack


you like the pain in the ass role, do you?

Are you heidnic or more the nazi? I can't see any signs of Right with
you. You are a painful double-thinker.... You should learn from
Eyeore... he can handle that well. He is a strong and nice English Man.
---
LOL, just what you've been looking for? Mandick?


--
JF
 
spamfree@spam.heaven wrote:

"My name is Manuel, I come from Barcelona, I speak Eeenglish"
you think you can really steer it?


.....keep dreaming



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic

P.S.: Eyeore is the best English writer here, IMHO. Cute IQ too...
 
Daniel Mandic wrote:

spamfree@spam.heaven wrote:


On 21 Oct 2007 23:22:53 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at
wrote:


John Fields wrote:


Mandic seems to think of himself as a sagacious dispenser of

obscure >> folksy wisdom and witticisms. Unfortunately, his
neophytic command >> of written English often reduces his otherwise
banal "edicts" to >> gibberish.


What a puffy text.

You can't believe that for yourself!?

You would do well to study this excellent English text, Daniel.
It could help you to express what you mean. So far, your choice of
words and syntax has indeed rendered most of your messages as
giibberish.

jack



you like the pain in the ass role, do you?

Are you heidnic or more the nazi? I can't see any signs of Right with
you. You are a painful double-thinker.... You should learn from
Eyeore... he can handle that well. He is a strong and nice English Man.



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
cough, cofffffffffffffffffff,, choke,,,erzczsxczx,.fdsarf,ewew


--
"I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken"
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
 
Daniel Mandic wrote:

spamfree@spam.heaven wrote:


I don't understand this message, Daniel.


How could you. You miss the missing link :)


May I offer a few words of advice?
First up, be careful with capitalisation. English native speakers can
get away with ignoring it, but like using much idiom, you should aim
for simple, correctly expressed language. Avoid much idiom and the
jokes of the native speaker until you are much more proficient with
English.


I have no need to follow the same complex you have, as a not English
native speaker. I can understand Latin much better than you.

Yes yes. Like ppl here, trying to express (correctER's) special German.
:)))) Just to be like that grumpy Germans (wish to be rather the race,
not the language, indeed), who, science told, couldn't speak
(articulate) so well in the past (~20-40000 Years before now), but
being an totally other tribe than they, actually.

Interesting but true. Maybe your childs, if born in the U.K., would
know English. You do not.


Be careful with punctuation. My "rule" for commas is "when the reading
of the text requires a pause, insert a comma".


You are in a coma, yes.


Your pithy comment above, has no comma, and so would be read as:

"[J]ust count Moron. (whatever "Morons" are with a capital.)
In other words, "Do nothing else except count the number of Morons."


just count


If you were trying to call me a moron, and trying to tell me to count
(something) then you should have written "Just count, moron."
You could even capitalise the moron then, for emphasis.


Moron is nothing bad. Why do you elaborate so much about?
The Borders to the real Moron are near here...

Don't become boring. You can't impress me.


You see, the verb "count" can be either transitive or intransitive,
and you have not made it clear which you mean.


No, not Count, the Capital Word (e.g. Count Duukku in Star Wars).
Count, like counting. 1234


Do you come from Austria? Your native tongue would perhaps be German,
or the Austrian version thereof?


Can you be quiet. I have mentioned that before. Don't step in the same
complex as some Austrians do, thinking they are Neanderthaler and
Heidelbergensis. Haha .)))) And what are you? English? But just in the
meaning of the word 'english'.... You can't expect an angle, IMHO.


German syntax is a little different to English, and what you appear to
be doing, is perhaps using German syntax with a rather limited, but
often inappropriate choice of English vocabulary.

HTH, jack


Be quiet. Knowing good German is knowing well English. You are stupido.
Don't make me laugh..... best written English is read by me, as I would
write it to English, but.



Best regards,

Daniel Mandic

A few words for you.

Dig your self a hole, you'll need it later when common sense settles in.


--
"I'm never wrong, once I thought I was, but was mistaken"
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
 
Jamie wrote:

A few words for you.

Dig your self a hole, you'll need it later when common sense settles
in.
who are you?



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
Daniel Mandic wrote:
I have no need to follow the same complex you have, as a not English
native speaker. I can understand Latin much better than you.

Then post in Latin, where people have a chance of understanding what
you're trying to say. My Latin is poor, because I haven't used it in
almost 40 years.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Then post in Latin, where people have a chance of understanding
what you're trying to say. My Latin is poor, because I haven't used
it in almost 40 years.

It seems you are right. That shows the same what you have learned in
Electronics.



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
On 21 Oct 2007 23:22:53 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
wrote:

John Fields wrote:

Mandic seems to think of himself as a sagacious dispenser of obscure
folksy wisdom and witticisms. Unfortunately, his neophytic command
of written English often reduces his otherwise banal "edicts" to
gibberish.


What a puffy text.
---
"Puffy"? I like that!

Wordy, overblown, sanctimonious, condescending, sarcastic,... and
you managed to distill not the meaning, but the tone down to a
single word in a language clearly not your own. Not bad.
---

You can't believe that for yourself!?
---
Well, now you've dropped the ball if you were trying to direct flame
at a specific target.

It's readily apparent that I don't have a neophytic command of the
language, so you can't be talking about that unless you can't tell
that, clearly, I don't have a neophytic command of the language.
Since you seem to, it seems you've fallen into an IKYABWAI.

Google "I know you are but what am I" for a clue.


--
JF
 
John Fields wrote:

What a puffy text.

---
"Puffy"? I like that!
Yeah ;), sounds English...

Wordy, overblown, sanctimonious, condescending, sarcastic,... and
you managed to distill not the meaning, but the tone down to a
single word in a language clearly not your own. Not bad.
I can feel the Good in You, It's not too late.

Well, now you've dropped the ball if you were trying to direct flame
at a specific target.
hmmmm

you step back....
and try to be the ruler of yourself through me.

It's readily apparent that I don't have a neophytic command of the
language, so you can't be talking about that unless you can't tell
that, clearly, I don't have a neophytic command of the language.
Since you seem to, it seems you've fallen into an IKYABWAI.

Google "I know you are but what am I" for a clue.
what a grouping syndrome

....yawn



Best regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
Daniel Mandic wrote:

Jamie wrote:


A few words for you.

Dig your self a hole, you'll need it later when common sense settles
in.


who are you?



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
I think, there for, I am.

That is all you need to know about me.

--
"I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken"
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
 
Daniel Mandic wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Then post in Latin, where people have a chance of understanding
what you're trying to say. My Latin is poor, because I haven't used
it in almost 40 years.

It seems you are right. That shows the same what you have learned in
Electronics.

Let me know when your electronics are in space. Oh, that's right,
you can't. We built the communications systems for the European Space
Agency, right here in Florida. You lose!


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
On 22 Oct 2007 23:51:34 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Then post in Latin, where people have a chance of understanding
what you're trying to say. My Latin is poor, because I haven't used
it in almost 40 years.


It seems you are right. That shows the same what you have learned in
Electronics.
---
As if you knew anything about electronics...


--
JF
 
On 23 Oct 2007 00:22:51 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
wrote:

John Fields wrote:

What a puffy text.

---
"Puffy"? I like that!

Yeah ;), sounds English...

Wordy, overblown, sanctimonious, condescending, sarcastic,... and
you managed to distill not the meaning, but the tone down to a
single word in a language clearly not your own. Not bad.

I can feel the Good in You, It's not too late.
---
So, you fawn over compliments?
---

Well, now you've dropped the ball if you were trying to direct flame
at a specific target.

hmmmm

you step back....
and try to be the ruler of yourself through me.
---
Hmm...

Seems you left out your earlier:

">You can't believe that for yourself!?"

Which I replied to with the following:
---

Well, now you've dropped the ball if you were trying to direct flame
at a specific target.

It's readily apparent that I don't have a neophytic command of the
language, so you can't be talking about that unless you can't tell
that, clearly, I don't have a neophytic command of the language.
Since you seem to, it seems you've fallen into an IKYABWAI.

Google "I know you are but what am I" for a clue.

what a grouping syndrome

...yawn
---
Seems you're asleep most of the time...


--
JF
 
John Fields wrote:

Seems you're asleep most of the time...
Who cares about your statements.... who is interested in that...


Is you now the more important, or I. Talk more about you!



Best regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Let me know when your electronics are in space. Oh, that's right,
you can't. We built the communications systems for the European Space
Agency, right here in Florida. You lose!

Please do not reply with unholy Words like Florida without any apparent
reason.

Florida can nothing. They are behind.... at least 1700y, somewhere in
the Darg Ages.
I don't need the Florida :). I use Californian Articles rather! Do you
even have Indianer???



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
On 23 Oct 2007 11:13:30 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
wrote:

John Fields wrote:

Seems you're asleep most of the time...

Who cares about your statements.... who is interested in that...
---
Obviously you are, or you wouldn't keep replying.
---

Is you now the more important, or I. Talk more about you!
---
Why? Everyone is more important than you are.


--
JF
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top