Pig charged with identity theft

[Rich Grise]

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:34:00 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:05:33 -0700, Rich Grise
richg@example.net.invalid
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:37:40 -0700, Rich Grise
richg@example.net.invalid

BTW, how's that Afghanistan thing working out for you?

A lot better than it was a decade ago, in fact.

So, if we _do_ succeed in conquering Afghanistan, what do you plan to do
with it?

As always, you're blind to reality. Your questions is as nonsensical as
your politics.

And how much will we have to borrow from China to do so?

Ah. No answer, so go ad hominem.

Irony meter melts

Does anyone in the country know what we're trying to accomplish by
spending billions of dollars and getting dozens of our brothers and
sisters and sons and daughters killed?

Yes. It's clear you're too stupid to even listen, though.

Not if you'll answer my question.

Do you, or do you not, have an answer to the question?

Certainly, but there is no point in repeating what I've told you a hundred
times. You'll never listen.

Why not go ahead and give it then and _SEE_ if I reject it.

What, exactly. are we trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Pissing you off. There, maybe that'll sink in.

So, you're spending billions of dollars of our tax money and
getting people killed, for the express purpose of "pissing off
Rich Grise?"

I mean, if you don't even know the purpose of the invasion, then what's
the point, other than for the macho hotshot bullies getting their rocks
off?

Good grief, you're stupid.

But do you have an answer to my question?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

Tom Biasi wrote:

"Rich Grise" wrote in message
news:im8cdo$k0o$7@news.eternal-september.org...

Tim Wescott wrote:

Republicans will say it's for law and order. Democrats will say it's to
better provide warm fuzzies at need. Their corporate masters will
dictate it, because it'll just make us all better robots.

(Yup, I'm feeling particularly cynical tonight).

Well, if you don't like a corporation, simply don't buy their product.
You don't have that option when the taxman comes to confiscate your
paycheck.

Thanks,
Rich

OK I give up. Who's using Rich's computer?

No one. The light is on, but the operator died long ago.


--
You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's
Teflon coated.

 

[m II]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1




On 11-03-20 03:35 PM, Rich Grise wrote:

Last time they tattooed IDs on people, didn't they put them on their
forearms?

Properties of the US government prefer the chest.

http://www.theusmarines.com/meat-tags/


mike









-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNiOvfAAoJEJXfKw5kUPt7T7gH/iT5zQS4VkU2GWemkkb52FNB
ups9p6qCGb5O8+3glPOYjK2yaUPQLbGt7ZKEEeASiWUHDb+OMQp1TUW2FRtVh2CY
+wjepdj8OtmHlZfMIqUSKoRiyAr4AKzp+1xemTdA32EFx5capjHeZf9Ma6IliU5o
lYuswLMJ3vBThTRxQO62xXJDDZAIRzmS8JPxtcNPXp6OFPAHEClaRVSxdYP4iDpX
5E8lhLueha7rME/O7Z0CY68rqsHwKscOf63Dl2qj2Zo8jP5MYSgorDpdga+h3MXG
1vTtEuR2Kiursi/ty6c1SOlGqYLD5VLD9B6OZSLtLjZsUD4Ab6XwVXc3t1g254I=
=eNUF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:18:02 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:34:00 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:05:33 -0700, Rich Grise
richg@example.net.invalid
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:37:40 -0700, Rich Grise
richg@example.net.invalid

BTW, how's that Afghanistan thing working out for you?

A lot better than it was a decade ago, in fact.

So, if we _do_ succeed in conquering Afghanistan, what do you plan to do
with it?

As always, you're blind to reality. Your questions is as nonsensical as
your politics.

And how much will we have to borrow from China to do so?

Ah. No answer, so go ad hominem.

Irony meter melts

Does anyone in the country know what we're trying to accomplish by
spending billions of dollars and getting dozens of our brothers and
sisters and sons and daughters killed?

Yes. It's clear you're too stupid to even listen, though.

Not if you'll answer my question.

Because I have, *many* times. ...as have others. You're either too stupid to
read or you don't want the answer. Either way, I'm sure you'll continue to
drone on.

Do you, or do you not, have an answer to the question?

Certainly, but there is no point in repeating what I've told you a hundred
times. You'll never listen.

Why not go ahead and give it then and _SEE_ if I reject it.

Nope. BTDT, and you drone on.

What, exactly. are we trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Pissing you off. There, maybe that'll sink in.

So, you're spending billions of dollars of our tax money and
getting people killed, for the express purpose of "pissing off
Rich Grise?"

Some people need killing. Sorry if that offends you.

I mean, if you don't even know the purpose of the invasion, then what's
the point, other than for the macho hotshot bullies getting their rocks
off?

Good grief, you're stupid.

But do you have an answer to my question?

Yes.

 

[Rich Grise]

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:18:02 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid

Not if you'll answer my question.

Because I have, *many* times. ...as have others.

When? Can you cite?

You're either too
stupid to
read or you don't want the answer. Either way, I'm sure you'll continue
to drone on.

So, remind me. I _definitely_ want the answer, because I don't like seeing

America wasting lives and treasure with no purpose. Is it imperialism? Do
you intend to colonize? What's Afghanistan got that we want?

What, exactly, is the US administration trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Why have you spent half a thread evading the question? Are you afraid?

Just remind me of the answer you've allegedly given me but I've rejected, if
there really is such a thing. Please, have mercy on my simple, drug-addled
mind, and tell me, in small words, what exactly is the US administration
trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

If you'd answer the question, or remind me of the answer that you've
allegedly given "many" times, then we'd have a topic for lively debate -
but refusing to answer by saying "You'd just reject it" is just lame
weaseling.

Are you just another nym for AlwaysWrong?

You know, there's no shame in simply not knowing - in fact, "I do not know"
is the first stage of wisdom.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:03:41 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:18:02 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid

Not if you'll answer my question.

Because I have, *many* times. ...as have others.

When? Can you cite?

Don't be ridiculous.

You're either too
stupid to
read or you don't want the answer. Either way, I'm sure you'll continue
to drone on.

So, remind me. I _definitely_ want the answer, because I don't like seeing
America wasting lives and treasure with no purpose. Is it imperialism? Do
you intend to colonize? What's Afghanistan got that we want?

You're such a liar.

What, exactly, is the US administration trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Why have you spent half a thread evading the question? Are you afraid?

I'm not afraid, just tired of moron, like you, pretending that they don't know
why we're there.

Just remind me of the answer you've allegedly given me but I've rejected, if
there really is such a thing. Please, have mercy on my simple, drug-addled
mind, and tell me, in small words, what exactly is the US administration
trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

You're doing a good job of pretending to be a leftist.

If you'd answer the question, or remind me of the answer that you've
allegedly given "many" times, then we'd have a topic for lively debate -
but refusing to answer by saying "You'd just reject it" is just lame
weaseling.

Are you just another nym for AlwaysWrong?

Now you're simply removing all doubt that you're a liar.

You know, there's no shame in simply not knowing - in fact, "I do not know"
is the first stage of wisdom.

I know and *you* know. Stop pretending to be a moron.

 

[Rich Grise]

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

You know, there's no shame in simply not knowing - in fact, "I do not
know" is the first stage of wisdom.

I know and *you* know. Stop pretending to be a moron.

So, test me. What, exactly, is the US government trying to accomplish in
Afghanistan?

You keep telling me I know, but I don't, because according to you, my
drug-addled pea-brain will reject your answer.

Are you too lame or too cowardly to actually answer the question, or
do you simply not know?

What, exactly, is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Are you too cowardly to tell the truth?

Have you no testicles?

Are you simply another nym for AlwaysWrong?

Please, inquiring minds want to know:

What is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan? Are you
too lame to admit you don't know? Is it some deep dark secret? Is it
too embarrassing, or humiliating, to tell the truth? Come on, man up!

What is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:19:19 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

You know, there's no shame in simply not knowing - in fact, "I do not
know" is the first stage of wisdom.

I know and *you* know. Stop pretending to be a moron.

So, test me. What, exactly, is the US government trying to accomplish in
Afghanistan?

Good God, you are dense.

You keep telling me I know, but I don't, because according to you, my
drug-addled pea-brain will reject your answer.

Any sane person would know the answer to your stupid question, EXPECIALLY
SINCE YOU'VE ASKED IT MORE OFTEN THAN YOU BREATHE.

Are you too lame or too cowardly to actually answer the question, or
do you simply not know?

No, I simply don't want to play your stupid games. That's all you lefties can
muster.

What, exactly, is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

You're repeating yourself, but I've been trying to tell you that for a decade.

Are you too cowardly to tell the truth?

....repeat...

Have you no testicles?

Ah, trying to insult me. You're a loser.

Are you simply another nym for AlwaysWrong?

A lie, once again.

Please, inquiring minds want to know:

You must have no mind, then. <d'uh>

What is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan? Are you
too lame to admit you don't know? Is it some deep dark secret? Is it
too embarrassing, or humiliating, to tell the truth? Come on, man up!

....more repetition...

What is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

This is your brain on drugs...

 

[Rich Grise]

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

Any sane person would know the answer to your stupid question, EXPECIALLY
SINCE YOU'VE ASKED IT MORE OFTEN THAN YOU BREATHE.

And you have refused to answer it each and every time.

Speaking of SHOUTING, have you given yourself a stroke yet?

Is the vein popping out on your forehead?

I've asked a lot, and you've refused to give any answer at all, every single
time.

And you haven't quoted any post where I've "rejected" it. Admittedly, I'll
probably disagree with it, but since I don't yet know what your answer is,
because you've been evading the question, projecting your failure onto me,
how can I possibly have any basis for comparison?

Are you just another nym of AlwaysWrong, or just another troll?

What, exactly, is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:00:02 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

Any sane person would know the answer to your stupid question, EXPECIALLY
SINCE YOU'VE ASKED IT MORE OFTEN THAN YOU BREATHE.

And you have refused to answer it each and every time.

You're a liar.

Speaking of SHOUTING, have you given yourself a stroke yet?

You're a moron if you think you bother me. Well, you just proved it.

Is the vein popping out on your forehead?

You really are clueless. Druggies are that way.

I've asked a lot, and you've refused to give any answer at all, every single
time.

Liar.

And you haven't quoted any post where I've "rejected" it. Admittedly, I'll
probably disagree with it, but since I don't yet know what your answer is,
because you've been evading the question, projecting your failure onto me,
how can I possibly have any basis for comparison?

Probably? You're a moron, and continue to prove it.

Are you just another nym of AlwaysWrong, or just another troll?

Why do you continue to lie? To prove to *everyone* how drug addled you really
are?

What, exactly, is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

You keep asking that question. Even if I answered it, again, you would
*CONTINUE* to ask it. This is your brain on drugs.

 

[Rich Grise]

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:00:02 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

Any sane person would know the answer to your stupid question,
EXPECIALLY SINCE YOU'VE ASKED IT MORE OFTEN THAN YOU BREATHE.

And you have refused to answer it each and every time.

You're a liar.

Show me.

Speaking of SHOUTING, have you given yourself a stroke yet?

You're a moron if you think you bother me. Well, you just proved it.

Is the vein popping out on your forehead?

You really are clueless. Druggies are that way.

I've asked a lot, and you've refused to give any answer at all, every
single time.

Liar.

Show me.

And you haven't quoted any post where I've "rejected" it. Admittedly, I'll
probably disagree with it, but since I don't yet know what your answer is,
because you've been evading the question, projecting your failure onto me,
how can I possibly have any basis for comparison?

Probably? You're a moron, and continue to prove it.

If that's your excuse for refusing to answer my question, it's a lame one.

Are you just another nym of AlwaysWrong, or just another troll?

Why do you continue to lie? To prove to *everyone* how drug addled you
really are?

Show me this alleged "lie."

What, exactly, is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

You keep asking that question. Even if I answered it, again, you would
*CONTINUE* to ask it. This is your brain on drugs.

No, if you were man enough to answer, I'd have some material for debate.

Do you plan to ever man up and admit that you simply don't know? At least
I'm man enough to admit that I don't know, which is why I keep asking; I
haven't figured out yet why you so steadfastly refuse to answer.

What, exactly, is the US government trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Thanks,s
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:11:26 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:00:02 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

Any sane person would know the answer to your stupid question,
EXPECIALLY SINCE YOU'VE ASKED IT MORE OFTEN THAN YOU BREATHE.

And you have refused to answer it each and every time.

You're a liar.

Show me.

I don't have to. Everyone who knows you now knows you're a liar. As long as
you continue, even more will know what a raving, drug addled, loon you really
are.

<...>