Pig charged with identity theft

[Michael Gross]

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/18/Police-officer-charged-with-identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/

MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
Mercedes was arrested this week.

Lymon Taylor, 33, was freed on $5,000 bond Wednesday, the Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel reported. He was charged with felony identity theft,
which carries a potential sentence of six years in prison.

The Milwaukee Police Department suspended Taylor, spokeswoman Anne
Schwartz said.

Investigators said another man, Lee Ellis, told them he and Taylor
discovered a California company that said it could repair credit ratings
and charged a $2,500 fee. Both were given Social Security numbers and
told to use them with their own names and a different address.

Taylor was allegedly using a number assigned to a 7-year-old boy in
Racine, Wis. The boy's parents insisted on prosecution, police said.

The police officer allegedly used the new number to obtain a loan for
the purchase of a 2007 Mercedes-Benz S550 with a Blue Book value of
around $48,000.

 

[Rich Grise]

Michael Gross wrote:
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/18/Police-officer-charged-with-identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/

MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
Mercedes was arrested this week.

A Social Security number for a SEVEN YEAR OLD??????!!!!?!?!

I guess Big Brother is here.

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:01:30 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

Michael Gross wrote:
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/18/Police-officer-charged-with-identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/

MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
Mercedes was arrested this week.

A Social Security number for a SEVEN YEAR OLD??????!!!!?!?!

Wow! You've been out of the loop. SSNs are issued pretty much at birth, and
have been for forty years.

I guess Big Brother is here.

If you think this is a big example of BigBrotherism, you're sleeping under a
rock.

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

There is a lot more to a President than a nutcase. We already have one of
those.

 

[Rich Grise]

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:01:30 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

There is a lot more to a President than a nutcase. We already have one of
those.

Can you be any more specific?

What, exactly, makes you consider him a nutcase? Is it just that he's
adamant about the Constitution, that he believes in personal Liberty,
or is it that he's not a war addict?

I mean, really. Show me some facts and figures that make you consider
Dr. Paul a "nutcase?"

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Tim Wescott]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:01:30 -0700, Rich Grise wrote:

Michael Gross wrote:
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/18/Police-officer-charged-with-
identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/

MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
Mercedes was arrested this week.

A Social Security number for a SEVEN YEAR OLD??????!!!!?!?!

I guess Big Brother is here.

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

Where have you been, Rich? They wouldn't let our boys out of the
hospital until they had social security numbers. They're 17 and 12 now.

Fortunately neither them pulled '666', although there have been times
that we've wondered...

--
http://www.wescottdesign.com

 

[Tim Wescott]

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:29:35 +0000, Michael Gross wrote:

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/18/Police-officer-charged-with-
identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/

MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
Mercedes was arrested this week.

Lymon Taylor, 33, was freed on $5,000 bond Wednesday, the Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel reported. He was charged with felony identity theft,
which carries a potential sentence of six years in prison.

The Milwaukee Police Department suspended Taylor, spokeswoman Anne
Schwartz said.

Investigators said another man, Lee Ellis, told them he and Taylor
discovered a California company that said it could repair credit ratings
and charged a $2,500 fee. Both were given Social Security numbers and
told to use them with their own names and a different address.

Taylor was allegedly using a number assigned to a 7-year-old boy in
Racine, Wis. The boy's parents insisted on prosecution, police said.

The police officer allegedly used the new number to obtain a loan for
the purchase of a 2007 Mercedes-Benz S550 with a Blue Book value of
around $48,000.

You'd have to check for the accuracy of this, but I recall Frank Serpico
as being quoted (or perhaps I even heard him say it in an interview) that
cops are people, and there's the same proportion of honest cops to rotten
ones as there are honest citizens to crooks.

So of _course_ you'd see the occasional bad one.

--
http://www.wescottdesign.com

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:39:22 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:01:30 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

There is a lot more to a President than a nutcase. We already have one of
those.

Can you be any more specific?

Whether you like it or not, the President is also the Commander in Chief. Ron
Paul would be a miserable choice, for this most important of Presidential
functions.

What, exactly, makes you consider him a nutcase? Is it just that he's
adamant about the Constitution, that he believes in personal Liberty,
or is it that he's not a war addict?

Whether you like it or not, that's the President's most important function.

I mean, really. Show me some facts and figures that make you consider
Dr. Paul a "nutcase?"

Oh, good grief, you're dense.

 

[m II]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1





On 11-03-19 02:59 PM, Tim Wescott wrote:

You'd have to check for the accuracy of this, but I recall Frank Serpico
as being quoted (or perhaps I even heard him say it in an interview) that
cops are people, and there's the same proportion of honest cops to rotten
ones as there are honest citizens to crooks.

So of _course_ you'd see the occasional bad one.

There's no screening process involved in being a member of the public at
large. There *IS* a screening process in the hiring of civil servants.

One can assume that filtering system failed in the case of criminal
police. Having the SAME ratio of dishonesty in both groups indicates a
failure in the selection process.

Lawyers? Politicians? It doesn't end with cops.


mike








-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNhUcKAAoJEJXfKw5kUPt78TYH/jv7pNnCXXOQvDAlrNBcdKbj
WS/8Z4waJtDeg2LeUbDzO6pGJv7nvWvWzT87V4aqhR4Pl/txpJc6s4rk0kzZscTG
rwwihmyjz2fJnLUgFKhtRL4UBJYYFFrJkg2LWH53EbeG3xqh2LXREIeNWnss/ohA
3jLgn6yDkxpxvmf/K+U//VnSZAqxqDnb0LdiZP7vLp6+Y5bYmh/nHY5OjSkwG/pK
6wf/yr91XLpgxZ5eX+G4ZJJykJCZ99uZYf5LybSyPpW9rcK9Lc4uj9FHMNldRTmE
49wkdc0IiwBKLNaylMCYsIPFfuRZkDKlDPgWbzKT4UWKRtnmB3vgBIF+8ZUGaeI=
=JirV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

Tim Wescott wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:01:30 -0700, Rich Grise wrote:

? Michael Gross wrote:
? http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/18/Police-officer-charged-with-
identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/
??
?? MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
?? bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
?? Mercedes was arrested this week.
??
? A Social Security number for a SEVEN YEAR OLD??????!!!!?!?!
?
? I guess Big Brother is here.
?
? Vote Ron Paul!
? http://www.ronpaul.com
?

Where have you been, Rich? They wouldn't let our boys out of the
hospital until they had social security numbers. They're 17 and 12 now.

Fortunately neither them pulled '666', although there have been times
that we've wondered...

Have you lifted their long hair to check their foreheads? ;-)


--
You can't fix stupid. You can't even put a Band-Aid™ on it, because it's
Teflon coated.

 

[Rich Grise]

Tim Wescott wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:01:30 -0700, Rich Grise wrote:
Michael Gross wrote:
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/18/Police-officer-charged-with-
identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/

MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
Mercedes was arrested this week.

A Social Security number for a SEVEN YEAR OLD??????!!!!?!?!

I guess Big Brother is here.

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

Where have you been, Rich?

Apparently under a rock somewhere.

They wouldn't let our boys out of the
hospital until they had social security numbers. They're 17 and 12 now.

Fortunately neither them pulled '666', although there have been times
that we've wondered...

I wonder when they'll go to tattoos.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:01:30 -0700, Rich Grise wrote:
? Michael Gross wrote:
? http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/18/Police-officer-charged-with-
identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/
??
?? MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
?? bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
?? Mercedes was arrested this week.
??
? A Social Security number for a SEVEN YEAR OLD??????!!!!?!?!
?
? I guess Big Brother is here.
?
? Vote Ron Paul!
? http://www.ronpaul.com

Where have you been, Rich? They wouldn't let our boys out of the
hospital until they had social security numbers. They're 17 and 12 now.

Fortunately neither them pulled '666', although there have been times
that we've wondered...

Have you lifted their long hair to check their foreheads? ;-)

Last time they tattooed IDs on people, didn't they put them on their

forearms?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:39:22 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:01:30 -0700, Rich Grise

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

There is a lot more to a President than a nutcase. We already have one
of those.

Can you be any more specific?

Whether you like it or not, the President is also the Commander in Chief.
Ron Paul would be a miserable choice, for this most important of
Presidential functions.

Ah. So you're simply a war addict.

Somebody needs to get America into rehab for its addiction to warmaking.

BTW, how's that Afghanistan thing working out for you?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:37:40 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:39:22 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:01:30 -0700, Rich Grise

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

There is a lot more to a President than a nutcase. We already have one
of those.

Can you be any more specific?

Whether you like it or not, the President is also the Commander in Chief.
Ron Paul would be a miserable choice, for this most important of
Presidential functions.

Ah. So you're simply a war addict.

What's left of your drug addled mind does tend to jump in the stupid
direction. Nothing new.

Somebody needs to get America into rehab for its addiction to warmaking.

BTW, how's that Afghanistan thing working out for you?

A lot better than it was a decade ago, in fact.

 

[Rich Grise]

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:37:40 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid

BTW, how's that Afghanistan thing working out for you?

A lot better than it was a decade ago, in fact.

So, if we _do_ succeed in conquering Afghanistan, what do you plan to do
with it?

And how much will we have to borrow from China to do so?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:05:33 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:37:40 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid

BTW, how's that Afghanistan thing working out for you?

A lot better than it was a decade ago, in fact.

So, if we _do_ succeed in conquering Afghanistan, what do you plan to do
with it?

As always, you're blind to reality. Your questions is as nonsensical as your
politics.

>And how much will we have to borrow from China to do so?

 

[Tim Wescott]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:34:21 -0700, Rich Grise wrote:

Tim Wescott wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:01:30 -0700, Rich Grise wrote:
Michael Gross wrote:
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2011/03/18/Police-officer-charged-with-
identity-theft/UPI-19081300477793/

MILWAUKEE, March 18 (UPI) -- A Milwaukee police officer who allegedly
bought a 7-year-old boy's Social Security number and used it to buy a
Mercedes was arrested this week.

A Social Security number for a SEVEN YEAR OLD??????!!!!?!?!

I guess Big Brother is here.

Vote Ron Paul!
http://www.ronpaul.com

Where have you been, Rich?

Apparently under a rock somewhere.

They wouldn't let our boys out of the hospital until they had social
security numbers. They're 17 and 12 now.

Fortunately neither them pulled '666', although there have been times
that we've wondered...

I wonder when they'll go to tattoos.

Thanks,
Rich

Tattoos, hell -- it'll be implanted chips, for sure.

Republicans will say it's for law and order. Democrats will say it's to
better provide warm fuzzies at need. Their corporate masters will
dictate it, because it'll just make us all better robots.

(Yup, I'm feeling particularly cynical tonight).

--
http://www.wescottdesign.com

 

[Rich Grise]

Tim Wescott wrote:

Republicans will say it's for law and order. Democrats will say it's to
better provide warm fuzzies at need. Their corporate masters will
dictate it, because it'll just make us all better robots.

(Yup, I'm feeling particularly cynical tonight).

Well, if you don't like a corporation, simply don't buy their product.

You don't have that option when the taxman comes to confiscate your
paycheck.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:05:33 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:37:40 -0700, Rich Grise
richg@example.net.invalid

BTW, how's that Afghanistan thing working out for you?

A lot better than it was a decade ago, in fact.

So, if we _do_ succeed in conquering Afghanistan, what do you plan to do
with it?

As always, you're blind to reality. Your questions is as nonsensical as
your politics.

And how much will we have to borrow from China to do so?

Ah. No answer, so go ad hominem.

Does anyone in the country know what we're trying to accomplish by
spending billions of dollars and getting dozens of our brothers and
sisters and sons and daughters killed?

Do you, or do you not, have an answer to the question?
What, exactly. are we trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

I mean, if you don't even know the purpose of the invasion, then what's the
point, other than for the macho hotshot bullies getting their rocks off?

Thanks,
Rich

 

[krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz]

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:34:00 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid>
wrote:

krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:05:33 -0700, Rich Grise <richg@example.net.invalid
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:37:40 -0700, Rich Grise
richg@example.net.invalid

BTW, how's that Afghanistan thing working out for you?

A lot better than it was a decade ago, in fact.

So, if we _do_ succeed in conquering Afghanistan, what do you plan to do
with it?

As always, you're blind to reality. Your questions is as nonsensical as
your politics.

And how much will we have to borrow from China to do so?

Ah. No answer, so go ad hominem.

<Irony meter melts>

Does anyone in the country know what we're trying to accomplish by
spending billions of dollars and getting dozens of our brothers and
sisters and sons and daughters killed?

Yes. It's clear you're too stupid to even listen, though.

Do you, or do you not, have an answer to the question?

Certainly, but there is no point in repeating what I've told you a hundred
times. You'll never listen.

What, exactly. are we trying to accomplish in Afghanistan?

Pissing you off. There, maybe that'll sink in.

I mean, if you don't even know the purpose of the invasion, then what's the
point, other than for the macho hotshot bullies getting their rocks off?

Good grief, you're stupid.

 

[Tom Biasi]

"Rich Grise" wrote in message
news:im8cdo$k0o$7@news.eternal-september.org...

Tim Wescott wrote:

Republicans will say it's for law and order. Democrats will say it's to
better provide warm fuzzies at need. Their corporate masters will
dictate it, because it'll just make us all better robots.

(Yup, I'm feeling particularly cynical tonight).

Well, if you don't like a corporation, simply don't buy their product.

You don't have that option when the taxman comes to confiscate your
paycheck.

Thanks,
Rich

OK I give up. Who's using Rich's computer?