R
Rod Speed
Guest
John_H <john4271@hotmail.com> wrote
Thanks for the washup, too rare imo.
Sylvia Else wrote
John_H wrote
Trevor Wilson wrote
John_H wrote
After 15 or so years the nicad battery in our 30y.o. portable phone
has chucked it in (it\'s only ever had one replacement). The current
options are nicad or Ni-MH.
Which way should I go?
If Ni-MH how long is it likely to last?
I only get around 4 years between replacements with a Samsung mobile
which presumably has a smart charger, hence the question.
**If the \'phone was designed to use NiCad batteries, then that is what
you should use. NiCad and NiMh batteries have different charging
requirements.
It predates Ni-MH but both are cuurently available as replacements.
It\'s the differences in the charging systems that concern but I\'m
unsure as to whether it really matters.
If it predates NiMH, then it\'s unlikely to be designed to charge them
properly.
Stick with what\'s known to work.
I failed to mention that the nicad is twice the price but there\'s also
a possibility they\'ll no longer be available further down the track.
Nor do I want the hassle of replacing the phone as the cradle is
screwed to the wall.
Consequently I\'ve decided to stick with nicad and hope it lasts
another 15 years..
Thanks to all who replied.
Thanks for the washup, too rare imo.