W
Wayne Chirnside
Guest
On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 21:18:30 +1100, Chris Jones wrote:
Got 3 yrs on the one to my left where I keep chilled gatorade on - off
$2.30 peltier.
I use an analog supply and a switching supply on two differing
applications.
The switcher is more efficient however any ripply no matter how small
will lead to dramatic inefficiency to the point as to make the whole deal
less than worthwhile.
I use a capacitance multiplier after the switcher and give away about 70
millivolts in order to achieve the greatest possible efficiency.
On 25/12/2015 12:11, Wayne Chirnside wrote:
[...]
On - off works just fine for this application.
I wouldn't dispute that it works well, but you might find that with
on-off control, the peltier devices don't last as long as with
continuous current that varies only slowly (especially for large peltier
devices and high currents). When the current is switched on and off,
there is slight expansion and contraction of the ceramic plates, which
could fatigue the semiconductor pillars within the peltier device
eventually. At least some peltier device manufacturers recommend against
on-off control. If you never experience failures than don't worry about
it.
Got 3 yrs on the one to my left where I keep chilled gatorade on - off
$2.30 peltier.
If you care about the input power requirement at less than full output
then there can also be a very slight efficiency advantage with variable
current rather than on-off, provided a very efficient switched-mode
controller is used (with filter inductors and capacitors so that pure DC
comes out). The efficiency advantage is because there are resistive
losses inside the peltier device, which are proportional to I squared
times R, and that works out to be more losses on average for e.g. 20
Amps at 50% duty cycle than it is for 10 Amps at 100% duty cycle. It
won't make any difference to the maximum cooling capability since even
with on-off control that will produce 100% duty cycle, which is the same
as you would get with variable current control.
I use an analog supply and a switching supply on two differing
applications.
The switcher is more efficient however any ripply no matter how small
will lead to dramatic inefficiency to the point as to make the whole deal
less than worthwhile.
I use a capacitance multiplier after the switcher and give away about 70
millivolts in order to achieve the greatest possible efficiency.