Oy - Yet Another MS Patch

B

Baphomet

Guest
N.Y. Times

Microsoft Warns Software Users of ’Critical’ Flaw

February 11, 2004
By JOHN SCHWARTZ

Microsoft announced yesterday that people who use its
operating system software must patch their computers yet
again, or their PC's will be vulnerable to attacks that
could cede control to hackers.

The company called the software flaw a "critical"
vulnerability, its highest rating. It is the second major
security flaw announced this month by Microsoft, which
recently began issuing regularly scheduled security patches
for its software. "We urge all of our customers to apply
this update," said Stephen Toulouse, a security program
manager with Microsoft's security response center.

The flaw, one of three announced yesterday by Microsoft,
affects a fundamental building block of network operating
systems known as Abstract Syntax Notation One, and helps
govern how machines communicate with one another and how
they establish secure communications. Microsoft's version
of that protocol is flawed, and could be used to gain
control of the target machine. The company said there was
no evidence that any attacks based on the flaw had
occurred.

Russ Cooper, a security expert with TruSecure Corporation,
said that the latest vulnerability was especially insidious
because it could allow attacks on the equivalent of the
computer's immune system. "It's like AIDS," he said. "This
is the stuff that's supposed to protect us."

For now, Mr. Cooper said, computer users are probably safe
because the flaw "is not exactly a simple one" to take
advantage of, and no attack that would exploit the flaw had
appeared on the hacker sites where such code is freely
circulated. But once such an attack method is created, he
said he expected to see a malicious program that could
circulate via e-mail messaging and which would have as
profound an effect on computer networks as the widespread
"Blaster" worm of last year.

A security company, eEye Digital Security, reported the
problem to Microsoft last July. Because the flaw is common
to so many operating systems and applications, "this is one
of the biggest ones ever," said Marc Maiffret, an executive
at eEye whose title is chief hacking officer.

Mr. Maiffret said that he was surprised that it took
Microsoft so long to issue a patch. "All the reason
Microsoft gave us was 'extra testing,' but it doesn't take
that long to test something this simple," he said.

Mr. Toulouse of Microsoft disagreed, saying "We don't just
produce a fix, we produce a comprehensive fix." A quick
response that does not work for every user, or which
introduces new vulnerabilities, "would almost be worse than
no fix at all," he said.

Microsoft urged users of virtually all of its current
operating systems - Windows NT, Windows 2000 or Windows XP
versions of its software, as well as Windows NT Server,
Server 2000 and Server 2003 - to go to
windowsupdate.microsoft.com to download the patch.
 
"Baphomet" <no.spam@no.spam.us> wrote:
N.Y. Times
[snip]
Microsoft announced yesterday that people who use its
operating system software must patch their computers yet
again, or their PC's will be vulnerable to attacks that
could cede control to hackers.

The company called the software flaw a "critical"
vulnerability, its highest rating.
It's hard to take Microsoft's "critical" rating very seriously when
the removal of Jewish and Nazi symbols from a font is considered a
"critical" update.

In this case though, it really is a critical update. Patch now.


Tim
--
The .sig is dead.
 
"Tim Auton" <tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY]> wrote in message
news:0bdl20145ulrbep5pfkp9j7bpihadonone@4ax.com...
"Baphomet" <no.spam@no.spam.us> wrote:
N.Y. Times
[snip]
Microsoft announced yesterday that people who use its
operating system software must patch their computers yet
again, or their PC's will be vulnerable to attacks that
could cede control to hackers.

The company called the software flaw a "critical"
vulnerability, its highest rating.

It's hard to take Microsoft's "critical" rating very seriously when
the removal of Jewish and Nazi symbols from a font is considered a
"critical" update.
Tim -

Only vaguely aware of your reference; I didn't pay much (any) attention to
it at the time. Perhaps from a Microsoft Corporate point of view, they
thought it was "critical" to their public image.

In this case though, it really is a critical update. Patch now.


Tim
--
The .sig is dead.
 
"Baphomet" <no.spam@no.spam.us> wrote:
> wrote in message
news:0bdl20145ulrbep5pfkp9j7bpihadonone@4ax.com...
[snip]
It's hard to take Microsoft's "critical" rating very seriously when
the removal of Jewish and Nazi symbols from a font is considered a
"critical" update.

Only vaguely aware of your reference; I didn't pay much (any) attention to
it at the time. Perhaps from a Microsoft Corporate point of view, they
thought it was "critical" to their public image.
Here's the MS page on the "critical" update for Orifice 2003:

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=833407

And here's a story about it:

http://theregister.co.uk/content/28/35494.html

I'm sure they did think it critical from a PR perspective. I'd prefer
it if they used "critical" updates only for threats to the integrity
of my data, not for PR exercises or for trying to get me to install
their latest piece of DRM-ware.


Tim
--
The .sig is dead.
 
X-No-Archive: yes

"Tim Auton" wrote:
"Baphomet" wrote:
"Tim Auton" wrote:

news:0bdl20145ulrbep5pfkp9j7bpihadonone@4ax.com..
..
[snip]
It's hard to take Microsoft's "critical"
rating very seriously when
the removal of Jewish and Nazi symbols from a
font is considered a
"critical" update.

Only vaguely aware of your reference; I didn't
pay much (any) attention to
it at the time. Perhaps from a Microsoft
Corporate point of view, they
thought it was "critical" to their public
image.

Here's the MS page on the "critical" update for
Orifice 2003:

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=833407
And here's a story about it:
http://theregister.co.uk/content/28/35494.html
<snip>
REAL Dumb! The symbol is a lot older than the
Nazi party, in America the Indians used it to
denote the passage of time. It meant the same
thing in older (thousands of years) documents and
it's not offensive! Censorship is!
 
"Tim Auton" <tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY]> wrote in message
news:lhol20hi3jaognqv8v0qojgvd3lelsnr5e@4ax.com...
"Baphomet" <no.spam@no.spam.us> wrote:
"Tim Auton" <tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY]> wrote in message
news:0bdl20145ulrbep5pfkp9j7bpihadonone@4ax.com...
[snip]
It's hard to take Microsoft's "critical" rating very seriously when
the removal of Jewish and Nazi symbols from a font is considered a
"critical" update.

Only vaguely aware of your reference; I didn't pay much (any) attention
to
it at the time. Perhaps from a Microsoft Corporate point of view, they
thought it was "critical" to their public image.

Here's the MS page on the "critical" update for Orifice 2003:

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=833407

And here's a story about it:

http://theregister.co.uk/content/28/35494.html

I'm sure they did think it critical from a PR perspective. I'd prefer
it if they used "critical" updates only for threats to the integrity
of my data, not for PR exercises or for trying to get me to install
their latest piece of DRM-ware.

Thanks for the heads up. I agree, it would be nice if the use of "critical"
was restricted to a user's perspective.

Tim
--
The .sig is dead.
 
"Baphomet" <no.spam@no.spam.us> schreef in bericht
news:102lban571v2qad@corp.supernews.com...
N.Y. Times

Microsoft Warns Software Users of ’Critical’ Flaw

February 11, 2004
By JOHN SCHWARTZ

Microsoft announced yesterday that people who use its
operating system software must patch their computers yet
again, or their PC's will be vulnerable to attacks that
could cede control to hackers.

snip

Monopolists always tend to think the world and the people on it only exist
to satisfy their needs. So they cannot even imagine about another point of
view then their own. Somehow the world (the users, so we) seem to accept it.
When will come the time that software producers can kept responsible for the
consequences of the flaws in their products? You can't even sell a toy
without the risk to be sued when something goes wrong. But old uncle Billy
can keep going to claim money without even the risk to pay back when his
products fail. He also continues to push aside products that may do a better
job. Sometimes using illegal methods only to say sorry afterwards. Still a
lot of people do not see it's a monopoly in software that looks like the one
that Bell ever had in telephony or Big Blue in computers. It may take some
time to open some peopels eyes. Until then we can't do nothing but using
Linux and writing how much we dislike MS (too often while using it.)

petrus



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.572 / Virus Database: 362 - Release Date: 28-1-2004
 
X-No-Archive: yes

"Roger Gt" <not@here.net> wrote:
"Tim Auton" wrote:
Here's the MS page on the "critical" update for
Orifice 2003:
[removal of nazi and jewish symbol from font]

snip
REAL Dumb! The symbol is a lot older than the
Nazi party, in America the Indians used it to
denote the passage of time. It meant the same
thing in older (thousands of years) documents and
it's not offensive! Censorship is!
Can't argue with that. I can see the fear of pressure from the
powerful Jewish lobby making Microsoft get rid of the Nazi (among
other things) symbols, but the Star of David as well? It smells of a
bad PR exercise that went too far. Does Jo Moore* work for Microsoft
now?


Tim

* Not that this is quite the same thing, but it's equally misguided.
--
The .sig is dead.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top