OT: Within the next 9 years, you will all be disarmed...

[Cursitor Doom]

It\'s just occured to me that is one disturbing corrolary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!
--

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

 

[bitrex]

On 11/20/2021 11:55 AM, Cursitor Doom wrote:

It\'s just occured to me that is one disturbing corrolary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!

<https://www.carsdirect.com/deals-articles/ford-rolls-out-0-apr-for-84-months-amid-coronavirus>

<https://seekingalpha.com/news/3755403-ford-motor-rallies-after-credit-suisse-points-to-30-upside-potential-off-electrification-push>

\"Credit Suisse turns around on Ford Motor Company (NYSE:F) with an
upgrade to an Outperform rating from Neutral.\"

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

What\'s their secret plan?! Not so secret is it!

 

[bitrex]

On 11/20/2021 11:55 AM, Cursitor Doom wrote:

It\'s just occured to me that is one disturbing corrolary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!

<https://www.carsdirect.com/deals-articles/ford-rolls-out-0-apr-for-84-months-amid-coronavirus>

<https://seekingalpha.com/news/3755403-ford-motor-rallies-after-credit-suisse-points-to-30-upside-potential-off-electrification-push>

\"Credit Suisse turns around on Ford Motor Company (NYSE:F) with an
upgrade to an Outperform rating from Neutral.\"

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

What\'s their secret plan?! Not so secret is it!

 

[server]

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:55:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@nowhere.com>
wrote:

It\'s just occured to me that is one disturbing corrolary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!
--

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

“New York City’s West Side Highway will be Underwater by 2009”



--

Father Brown\'s figure remained quite dark and still;
but in that instant he had lost his head. His head was
always most valuable when he had lost it.

 

[server]

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:55:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@nowhere.com>
wrote:

It\'s just occured to me that is one disturbing corrolary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!
--

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

“New York City’s West Side Highway will be Underwater by 2009”



--

Father Brown\'s figure remained quite dark and still;
but in that instant he had lost his head. His head was
always most valuable when he had lost it.

 

[server]

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:55:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@nowhere.com>
wrote:

It\'s just occured to me that is one disturbing corrolary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!
--

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

“New York City’s West Side Highway will be Underwater by 2009”



--

Father Brown\'s figure remained quite dark and still;
but in that instant he had lost his head. His head was
always most valuable when he had lost it.

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:43:26 -0800, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:55:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@nowhere.com
wrote:

It\'s just occured to me that is one disturbing corrolary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!
--

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

“New York City’s West Side Highway will be Underwater by 2009”

With the weight of illegals?

--

\"The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries
and nationality.\"

- The Communist Manifesto, Marx & Engels

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:43:26 -0800, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:55:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@nowhere.com
wrote:

It\'s just occured to me that is one disturbing corrolary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!
--

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

“New York City’s West Side Highway will be Underwater by 2009”

With the weight of illegals?

--

\"The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries
and nationality.\"

- The Communist Manifesto, Marx & Engels

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 8:41:12 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:43:26 -0800, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:55:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <c...@nowhere.com
wrote:

It\'s just occurred to me that is one disturbing corrollary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!
--

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

“New York City’s West Side Highway will be Underwater by 2009”

With the weight of illegals?

Probably not. John Larkin believes all kinds of nonsense he finds on climate change denial web-sites.

https://skepticalscience.com/Hansen-West-Side-Highway.htm

What Hansen was talking about actually happened during Hurricane Sandy in 2012, so Hansen wasn\'t too far off.

---
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 8:41:12 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:43:26 -0800, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:55:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <c...@nowhere.com
wrote:

It\'s just occurred to me that is one disturbing corrollary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!
--

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

“New York City’s West Side Highway will be Underwater by 2009”

With the weight of illegals?

Probably not. John Larkin believes all kinds of nonsense he finds on climate change denial web-sites.

https://skepticalscience.com/Hansen-West-Side-Highway.htm

What Hansen was talking about actually happened during Hurricane Sandy in 2012, so Hansen wasn\'t too far off.

---
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 8:41:12 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:43:26 -0800, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:55:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <c...@nowhere.com
wrote:

It\'s just occurred to me that is one disturbing corrollary of the arch
Globalist\'s pronouncement I\'ve been quoting in my sig! I wonder how
he\'s going to go about it? I\'m guessing he won\'t be putting himself in
the firing line!
--

\"By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it.\"

- Klaus Schwab, World Economic Forum CEO.

“New York City’s West Side Highway will be Underwater by 2009”

With the weight of illegals?

Probably not. John Larkin believes all kinds of nonsense he finds on climate change denial web-sites.

https://skepticalscience.com/Hansen-West-Side-Highway.htm

What Hansen was talking about actually happened during Hurricane Sandy in 2012, so Hansen wasn\'t too far off.

---
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[John Doe]

I think that\'s very likely, however long it takes.

Back when the Second Amendment was written, there was little difference
between civilian owned and government owned weaponry. Nowadays ordinary
people struggle to own handguns while government possesses HIDEOUSLY powerful
weapons. That trend is by design. It will continue.

All power is being sucked up into central government.

I would just love to see the states organize a constitutional convention, but
then our Supreme Dictators would declare it \"unconstitutional\". If the Deep
State military and a few states support the Supremes, that will be it.

 

[bitrex]

On 11/21/2021 8:59 AM, John Doe wrote:

I think that\'s very likely, however long it takes.

Back when the Second Amendment was written, there was little difference
between civilian owned and government owned weaponry. Nowadays ordinary
people struggle to own handguns while government possesses HIDEOUSLY powerful
weapons. That trend is by design. It will continue.

All power is being sucked up into central government.

I would just love to see the states organize a constitutional convention, but
then our Supreme Dictators would declare it \"unconstitutional\". If the Deep
State military and a few states support the Supremes, that will be it.

If you stopped only being against the central government during the
periods you\'re not licking its boots, Klaus Schwab\'s job would be much
more difficult.

 

[server]

John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:sndjc1$69c$2@dont-
email.me:

All power is being sucked up into central government.

Fucking idiot. That must be why they just spent several trillion on
US and what WE USE every day and OUR SCHOOLS and OUR needs as a nation
of over 331 million citizens.

Goddamned republitard mentally morphed dumbasses for listening to the
Republitard quacks in Washington convolute the truth for 60 years, and
you believed the bullshit, and even re-spew it yourself. They are
conservative of NOTHING. You were lied to.

You have no clue fuck all what \"power\" even is.

Electrical, political, or otherwise.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Monday, November 22, 2021 at 12:59:35 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:

I think that\'s very likely, however long it takes.

Back when the Second Amendment was written, there was little difference
between civilian owned and government owned weaponry.

The muskets were much the same. Civilians rarely owned cannon.

Even then, professional armies were a great deal more effective than even well-regulated militias, and the second amendment was more a sentimental endorsement of well-regulated militias than an kind of well-thought out policy, which is why no government since then has enacted anything quite a silly.

> Nowadays ordinary people struggle to own handguns while government possesses HIDEOUSLY powerful weapons. That trend is by design. It will continue..

It\'s purely a reflection of the development of technology in general. As we find out more about the physical world, the ways we can take advantage of our improving grasp of physics become progressively more varied, and most of the more effective variations are complicated and expensive.

That\'s not by design. It takes design skills, technological skills and quite a lot of money to exploit the new stuff we\'ve learned about, but learning more isn\'t any kind of choice. Learning less - and John Doe knows very little - could be, but it wouldn\'t be a wise choice.

> All power is being sucked up into central government.

Not all of it, by any means, but having a government that we all voted for is probably the least worst outcome when you think about the alternatives - not something that John Doe could manage.

I would just love to see the states organize a constitutional convention, but then our Supreme Dictators would declare it \"unconstitutional\". If the Deep
State military and a few states support the Supremes, that will be it.

John Doe believes in the Deep State - it doesn\'t exist, but he finds it to be a convenient delusion. He hasn\'t got a hope of understanding reality, but the Deep state is one of those convenient fictions that let him simplify the world into something he thinks he can understand.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[John Doe]

Three contrary replies, from The Three Stooges. No surprise.

In fact, my long-held well-founded opinion about civilian and government
owned weaponry was echoed in the recent US Supreme Court case (District of
Columbia v. Heller)...

Was there anything like that at the time of the adoption, or were the
civilian arms exactly the same as the ones you\'d use in the military?

--At the time that... even at the time Miller was decided, the civilian
arms were pretty much the sort that were used in the military.

And everyone with at least one eye open knows the difference between
civilian and government owned weaponry is extreme NOWADAYS. Civilians
struggle to own handguns while government owns HIDEOUSLY powerful weapons.

That\'s the way it goes. We have the best system in the world, but none is
perfect and it\'s been corrupted.

 

[John Doe]

This poster claims to be a libertarian but (before) it equated
self-control with \"big brother\". First time I heard that being a
libertarian stance. Amusing.

Loony libertarians should not fault others for inconsistency, given the
fact libertarianism itself is chock-full of major inconsistencies.
A libertarian running for office is like organizing a suicide squad...
They kill themselves before completing their mission.

No idea what this is referring to...

--
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx22.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Subject: Re: OT: Within the next 9 years, you will all be disarmed
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
References: <lu9ipg56cuoj7opms3q541am7744rt9h04@4ax.com> <sndjc1$69c$2@dont-email.me
From: bitrex <user@example.net
In-Reply-To: <sndjc1$69c$2@dont-email.me
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <bttmJ.25189$452.19022@fx22.iad
X-Complaints-To: abuse@frugalusenet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 15:20:39 UTC
Organization: frugalusenet - www.frugalusenet.com
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 10:20:39 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1731
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:653203

On 11/21/2021 8:59 AM, John Doe wrote:
I think that\'s very likely, however long it takes.

Back when the Second Amendment was written, there was little difference
between civilian owned and government owned weaponry. Nowadays ordinary
people struggle to own handguns while government possesses HIDEOUSLY powerful
weapons. That trend is by design. It will continue.

All power is being sucked up into central government.

I would just love to see the states organize a constitutional convention, but
then our Supreme Dictators would declare it \"unconstitutional\". If the Deep
State military and a few states support the Supremes, that will be it.


If you stopped only being against the central government during the
periods you\'re not licking its boots, Klaus Schwab\'s job would be much
more difficult.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Monday, November 22, 2021 at 9:29:02 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:

Three contrary replies, from The Three Stooges. No surprise.

In fact, my long-held well-founded opinion about civilian and government
owned weaponry was echoed in the recent US Supreme Court case (District of
Columbia v. Heller)...

John Doe sees his silly ideas being \"echoed\" because he cheery picks the bits that more or less agree, and ignores the rest of the opinion, which doesn\'t.

What he\'s got is a well-floundered opinion - a bunch of fishy misconceptions which ignores the crucial point which is that weapons are tools, and much more effective in skilled and practiced hands. A modern rifle is a lot easier to use than a muzzle-loadijng musket - and flint-lock muskets were easier to use than match-lock muskets, but neither worked if you forget to put a pinch of powder in the priming pan.

Breech loading guns fired by percussion caps were a whole lot easier to use, and took less time to reload.

Was there anything like that at the time of the adoption, or were the civilian arms exactly the same as the ones you\'d use in the military?

--At the time that... even at the time Miller was decided, the civilian arms were pretty much the sort that were used in the military.

They were, but getting well enough trained to be able to sustain a steady rate of fire under battlefield conditions was remarkably time-consuming

> And everyone with at least one eye open knows the difference between civilian and government owned weaponry is extreme NOWADAYS.

The difference between a musket and a cannon was pretty dramatic, but John Doe doesn\'t think about artillery - he has enough trouble distinguishing between long guns and hand guns.

> Civilians struggle to own handguns while government owns HIDEOUSLY powerful weapons.

Some civilians own tanks. Lower income countries put a heavy machine gun on the back of a light truck, which can be pretty intimidating.

> That\'s the way it goes. We have the best system in the world, but none is perfect and it\'s been corrupted.

The US has a remarkably antiquated political system, and the people who set it up thought that the people who owned the country should run the country, and found ways of getting it to work that way even with representatives elected by a popular vote (though universal suffrage was added in later, and the Republicans now seem to put a lot of energy into discouraging the less-well-off from voting). The corruption was built into the system from the start. More recent constitutions do better, but people with money are influential in every system - if more so in the US than in advanced industrial countries with more modern constitutions.

John Doe thinks that it is the best system in the world because he knows very little about it and even less about the systems used in other advanced industrial countries.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[bitrex]

On 11/22/2021 6:55 AM, John Doe wrote:

This poster claims to be a libertarian but (before) it equated
self-control with \"big brother\". First time I heard that being a
libertarian stance. Amusing.

Loony libertarians should not fault others for inconsistency, given the
fact libertarianism itself is chock-full of major inconsistencies.
A libertarian running for office is like organizing a suicide squad...
They kill themselves before completing their mission.

No idea what this is referring to...

The list of inconsistencies in JD\'s posts could stretch to the Moon and
back. Some days he likes central government power, some days against it.
Some days he says I\'m \"jealous\" of billionaires, and some days he
complains about the super-rich vs. the middle class.

My own theory is that he watched too many porno videos of big black
dicks on white girls, and lost his fuckin\' mind.

 

[bitrex]

On 11/22/2021 5:28 AM, John Doe wrote:

Three contrary replies, from The Three Stooges. No surprise.

In fact, my long-held well-founded opinion about civilian and government
owned weaponry was echoed in the recent US Supreme Court case (District of
Columbia v. Heller)...

Was there anything like that at the time of the adoption, or were the
civilian arms exactly the same as the ones you\'d use in the military?

--At the time that... even at the time Miller was decided, the civilian
arms were pretty much the sort that were used in the military.

And everyone with at least one eye open knows the difference between
civilian and government owned weaponry is extreme NOWADAYS. Civilians
struggle to own handguns while government owns HIDEOUSLY powerful weapons.

That\'s the way it goes. We have the best system in the world, but none is
perfect and it\'s been corrupted.

All JD knows for sure is that he\'s an everyday Caucasian chud and
wanna-be policeman, and doesn\'t feel as powerful as he thinks an
everyday Caucasian chud and wanna-be policeman should feel, so he
figures this must mean something has gone wrong somewhere, instead of
that the \"system\" is working pretty much as intended.