Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except that he left part of the definition out. That being "in aOn Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:36:54 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:46:50 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:26:12 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
What matters is that 1 N of force accelerates 1 kg of mass by 1
m/sec^2.
Your problem is that you actually inferred that those numbers carried
through to any location on the planet, until you were proven (or shown)
that you were wrong. They do not. You lose... again.
Those numbers work anywhere in the solar system.
...by definition. ;-)
F=(G ------)m2On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:23:27 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
---
OK, but isn't it written:
G m1 m2
Fg = ---------
r˛
?
Some people might, but they have to define what they mean by "r" or
"d" or whatever they use. In Russian or Greek or Arabic or Japanese,
they might use different symbols. Apparently Newton used the Latin
text word for "distance", and expressed the force relation in prose.
Modern mathematical notation wasn't used in his day. He invented
calculus, but lots of people came along later and reformulated the way
it looks today. Same thing happened with Maxwell's equations: he
described them, but others put then into our modern forms.
m1
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:33:10 +0200, Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please
wrote:
On 06/17/2010 06:12 AM, krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:15:04 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:08:31 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:50:06 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:26:58 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Is that true in the "near field"? Integrate the volume of the earth over the
square of the distances and I'd expect to see that not all points affect
gravity the same. IOW, I'd expect the apparent "center" of the Earth to be
somewhat closer than it really is.
You are so goddamned retarded that you cannot even follow a thread. It
was posted three times already, dumbass.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Earth-G-force.png
More irrelevance from DimBulb.
It is absolutely relevant.
You're full of shit. ...but you like it that way.
Don't wrestle a pig. You'll get covered in mud and the pig likes it.
Close, but AlwaysWrong has a fetish for feces. He's really into it.
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:28:30 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:54:23 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
the sphere
acts as if all its mass was concentrated at the center.
Bullshit. That would be a black hole.
Always wrong.
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 01:08:10 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:50:38 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:43:32 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 01:39:05 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
Tim Watts wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:32:09 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wibbled:
My Vermont house, other than the living and family rooms (cathedral
ceilings) had 7' 2" ceilings; definitely not standard.
This first floor of this house has 9' ceilings and the two bedrooms
upstairs 8', with the great room 18', and higher. ;-)
You should try my village, which dates back to 1066 - in fact the Battle
of Hastings was fought and shamefully lost (especially when you visit the
field and see the massive tactical advantage Harold had), 3 miles down
the road in a town called "Battle" (hmm) and not actually in Hastings
which is rather further down the road.
I digress...
Ceilings you can brush your head on and 5' front doors or less on some of
the old timber framed houses.
You sublet from a Leprechaun?
Someone with DimBulb's stature.
I am tall enough to beat knots onto the top of your skull, boy.
Not.
Not even in his hooker heels.
Not even the ones he got out of mommy's hamper?
---On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:20:12 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:20:39 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:26:07 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:06 pm, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLe...@InfiniteSeries.Org
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:08:10 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
gher...@teachspin.com> wrote:
we can treat it as linear
and get the right number.
No. You get NEAR the right number. You no longer get a "reliable"
reading, regardless of the number the instrument reports.
I'm done with you.
Go pester some other news group.
George H.
I suppose at some point it becomes obvious that some posters aren't
just nasty ignorant SOBs, they are in fact mentally deficient for one
reason or another. If we met them in person, it would be obvious. On
usenet, it's harder to tell.
But time wounds all heels, so eventually your true colors (or lack of
them) surface.
And the more time you spend angry, the more your immune system will
stay revved up, and the faster you'll age. Really.
"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:28:30 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:54:23 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
the sphere
acts as if all its mass was concentrated at the center.
Bullshit. That would be a black hole.
Always wrong.
The black hole is between Dimmie's ears. We have conformation of
this, by the fact that nothing intelligent ever escapes his head.
Geez, you are way over-invested in this thing.On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:34:31 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:20:12 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:20:39 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:26:07 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:06 pm, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLe...@InfiniteSeries.Org
wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:08:10 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
gher...@teachspin.com> wrote:
we can treat it as linear
and get the right number.
No. You get NEAR the right number. You no longer get a "reliable"
reading, regardless of the number the instrument reports.
I'm done with you.
Go pester some other news group.
George H.
I suppose at some point it becomes obvious that some posters aren't
just nasty ignorant SOBs, they are in fact mentally deficient for one
reason or another. If we met them in person, it would be obvious. On
usenet, it's harder to tell.
But time wounds all heels, so eventually your true colors (or lack of
them) surface.
And the more time you spend angry, the more your immune system will
stay revved up, and the faster you'll age. Really.
---
Oh Gawd...
So now you try to talk me into early death because you read something
to that effect, somewhere, written by someone you can't argue with,
and because I take exception to your poison pen, and vent?
How much earlier would I die, from guilt, if I let you get away with
your chicanery by not even contesting it when it's plain to me but
maybe less plain to others whom you'd otherwise bamboozle?
I don't know, but I do know I wouldn't want to die without having at
least tried to show you up for the posturing bully you are.
AlwaysWrong again lives up to his name.On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:41:16 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:36:54 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:46:50 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:26:12 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
What matters is that 1 N of force accelerates 1 kg of mass by 1
m/sec^2.
Your problem is that you actually inferred that those numbers carried
through to any location on the planet, until you were proven (or shown)
that you were wrong. They do not. You lose... again.
Those numbers work anywhere in the solar system.
...by definition. ;-)
Except that he left part of the definition out. That being "in a
vacuum".
Wrong again, AlwaysWrong. You really are a zero.On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:46:27 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:23:27 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
---
OK, but isn't it written:
G m1 m2
Fg = ---------
r˛
?
Some people might, but they have to define what they mean by "r" or
"d" or whatever they use. In Russian or Greek or Arabic or Japanese,
they might use different symbols. Apparently Newton used the Latin
text word for "distance", and expressed the force relation in prose.
Modern mathematical notation wasn't used in his day. He invented
calculus, but lots of people came along later and reformulated the way
it looks today. Same thing happened with Maxwell's equations: he
described them, but others put then into our modern forms.
m1
F=(G ------)m2
r2
Same thing.
You certainly seem Fooly invested in your abject denial.Geez, you are way over-invested in this thing.
John
The horses were embarrassed."krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:33:10 +0200, Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please
wrote:
On 06/17/2010 06:12 AM, krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:15:04 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:08:31 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:50:06 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:26:58 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Is that true in the "near field"? Integrate the volume of the earth over the
square of the distances and I'd expect to see that not all points affect
gravity the same. IOW, I'd expect the apparent "center" of the Earth to be
somewhat closer than it really is.
You are so goddamned retarded that you cannot even follow a thread. It
was posted three times already, dumbass.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Earth-G-force.png
More irrelevance from DimBulb.
It is absolutely relevant.
You're full of shit. ...but you like it that way.
Don't wrestle a pig. You'll get covered in mud and the pig likes it.
Close, but AlwaysWrong has a fetish for feces. He's really into it.
Too much, apparently. They fired him from his job of mucking out
horse stalls.
So, said force against said mass in a slurry of pudding yields the sameOn Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:55:04 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:41:16 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:36:54 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:46:50 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:26:12 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
What matters is that 1 N of force accelerates 1 kg of mass by 1
m/sec^2.
Your problem is that you actually inferred that those numbers carried
through to any location on the planet, until you were proven (or shown)
that you were wrong. They do not. You lose... again.
Those numbers work anywhere in the solar system.
...by definition. ;-)
Except that he left part of the definition out. That being "in a
vacuum".
AlwaysWrong again lives up to his name.
A perfect vacuum explains that. ...and Dimmie sucks, too."krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:28:30 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:54:23 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
the sphere
acts as if all its mass was concentrated at the center.
Bullshit. That would be a black hole.
Always wrong.
The black hole is between Dimmie's ears. We have conformation of
this, by the fact that nothing intelligent ever escapes his head.
He's got you hooked, why bother reeling you in?On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:45:02 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:28:30 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:54:23 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
the sphere
acts as if all its mass was concentrated at the center.
Bullshit. That would be a black hole.
Always wrong.
The black hole is between Dimmie's ears. We have conformation of
this, by the fact that nothing intelligent ever escapes his head.
That is why none of you hang around. If you were intelligent, you
would already be inside my head. Since you are an utter retard, you have
no attraction to my head. You lose... Again.
Dumbfuck, it is the same. Do you not understand transposition?On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:59:41 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:46:27 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:23:27 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
---
OK, but isn't it written:
G m1 m2
Fg = ---------
r˛
?
Some people might, but they have to define what they mean by "r" or
"d" or whatever they use. In Russian or Greek or Arabic or Japanese,
they might use different symbols. Apparently Newton used the Latin
text word for "distance", and expressed the force relation in prose.
Modern mathematical notation wasn't used in his day. He invented
calculus, but lots of people came along later and reformulated the way
it looks today. Same thing happened with Maxwell's equations: he
described them, but others put then into our modern forms.
m1
F=(G ------)m2
r2
Same thing.
Wrong again, AlwaysWrong. You really are a zero.
Just can't leave your fetish alone. You should seek help for that.On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:25:27 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:01:57 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:49:37 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Turns out that, seen from outside a uniform-density sphere, the sphere
acts as if all its mass was concentrated at the center.
I hear you, just trying to get my head around the calculus.
I think that he is wrong, and you couldn't wrap your head around
anything other than the inside of your ass.
I know you've been trying (very trying) to conceal it, but your scat fetish is
showing through again, DimBulb. Now put mommy's computer away and go play in
her hamper, like a good little DimBulb.
Take your head out of your ass, and do not return to the group until
^^^
you do.
You could leave and make everyone happy. It would give you far more timeComply, and we will be sure to never see you again.
Always wrong.On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:27:04 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
You ain't real bright. It is a balance. It requires gravity, but is
not tied to it for calibration of the instrument, like a spring scale is.
Irrelevant.
It is absolutely relevant.
Not possible. That would imply that he was a product of sexual reproduction."krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 01:08:10 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:50:38 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLever@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:43:32 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 01:39:05 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
Tim Watts wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:32:09 -0500, "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wibbled:
My Vermont house, other than the living and family rooms (cathedral
ceilings) had 7' 2" ceilings; definitely not standard.
This first floor of this house has 9' ceilings and the two bedrooms
upstairs 8', with the great room 18', and higher. ;-)
You should try my village, which dates back to 1066 - in fact the Battle
of Hastings was fought and shamefully lost (especially when you visit the
field and see the massive tactical advantage Harold had), 3 miles down
the road in a town called "Battle" (hmm) and not actually in Hastings
which is rather further down the road.
I digress...
Ceilings you can brush your head on and 5' front doors or less on some of
the old timber framed houses.
You sublet from a Leprechaun?
Someone with DimBulb's stature.
I am tall enough to beat knots onto the top of your skull, boy.
Not.
Not even in his hooker heels.
Not even the ones he got out of mommy's hamper?
That's where he hides them, so his 'daddy' doesn't spank him for
dressing like a hooker.
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
"krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
Close, but AlwaysWrong has a fetish for feces. He's really into it.
Too much, apparently. They fired him from his job of mucking out
horse stalls.
The horses were embarrassed.