OT:Whats with the Gallop Poll?

[Rolavine]

The Gallop Poll has been high for Bush all along. Are they being paid by the
RNC? Their results are way out of line. It is easy for them to do this, they
don't disclose the number of Republican - democrat and independent voters they
interview as a representative sample. One account I read guess that Gallop is
adding way too many Republicans to the list.

Anyway, I think they are full of Bushshit, and I have now reduced them to the
status of a J.D. Powers, a marketing tool that will find and give you an award
for anything you are willing to pay for.

The buzz on the net is that Gallop is sampling 40% Republicans, 33% Democrats,
and 27% indies. For this election that is an absurd ratio, and lately Repubs
and Dems have been voting in about equal numbers in Presidential elections.

Rocky

 

[Jonathan Kirwan]

On 19 Oct 2004 07:06:55 GMT, rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine) wrote:

The Gallop Poll has been high for Bush all along. Are they being paid by the
RNC?

Gallop is no longer owned by the Gallops. Yes, new ownership is hauling for the
Republicans, now. Remember reading a story about this, some time ago.

Jon

 

[Clarence]

"Jonathan Kirwan" <jkirwan@easystreet.com> wrote in message
news:dgm9n0p1vc57lkpakp70ctmvsoj6oq528t@4ax.com...

On 19 Oct 2004 07:06:55 GMT, rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine) wrote:

The Gallop Poll has been high for Bush all along. Are they being paid by the
RNC?

Gallop is no longer owned by the Gallops. Yes, new ownership is hauling for
the
Republicans, now. Remember reading a story about this, some time ago.

Jon

Typical BS..... No value here!

 

[Clarence]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:qn8bn019uuaar83u2ib310tldjejiajq7i@4ax.com...

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:28:59 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:

snip
---
Other than an example of an actual moron, what's of no value here is
you.
--
John Fields

Mind your BP John, hate to lose you early!

At least we are equals here!

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:01:49 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:qn8bn019uuaar83u2ib310tldjejiajq7i@4ax.com...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:28:59 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:

snip
---
Other than an example of an actual moron, what's of no value here is
you.
--
John Fields

Mind your BP John, hate to lose you early!

At least we are equals here!

---
Not when all you can come up with is lame crap like that, we're not.

--
John Fields

 

[Clarence]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:2hbbn0tv0blb3kmsmenpfs541kb2r314lo@4ax.com...

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:30:00 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:28:59 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:

Typical BS..... No value here!
---
Other than an example of an actual moron, what's of no value here is
^
as
you.

Sorry John, I don't speak Texan.

 

[Clarence]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
newsobbn0phb1tf190ocftio5hcjoj98vuor6@4ax.com...

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:01:49 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:


snip

Mind your BP John, hate to lose you early!

At least we are equals here!

---
Not when all you can come up with is lame crap like that, we're not.

Actually we are. But you can't admit it.

 

[Fred Bloggs]

Clarence wrote:

"Jonathan Kirwan" <jkirwan@easystreet.com> wrote in message
news:dgm9n0p1vc57lkpakp70ctmvsoj6oq528t@4ax.com...

On 19 Oct 2004 07:06:55 GMT, rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine) wrote:


The Gallop Poll has been high for Bush all along. Are they being paid by the
RNC?

Gallop is no longer owned by the Gallops. Yes, new ownership is hauling for

the

Republicans, now. Remember reading a story about this, some time ago.

Jon


Typical BS..... No value here!

I don't know about "Gallop", but the stories of abuse are all true about
Gallup. It's nice to see you semi-retarded types converse about 60 day
old news nonetheless.

 

[Rich Grise]

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:29:41 +0000, Clarence wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
newsobbn0phb1tf190ocftio5hcjoj98vuor6@4ax.com...
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:01:49 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:


snip

Mind your BP John, hate to lose you early!

At least we are equals here!

---
Not when all you can come up with is lame crap like that, we're not.


Actually we are. But you can't admit it.

We all have equal rights, sure, but apparently you have a more equal
right to be stupid.

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Clarence]

"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> wrote in message
newsan.2004.10.20.02.04.45.866361@example.net...

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:29:41 +0000, Clarence wrote:

snip
We all have equal rights,
Cheers!
Rich

Just like you, same rights!

 

[Fred Bloggs]

Product developer wrote:

The internals dictate the outcome.

The "internals"?

Granted, all the generic polls will
show Bush ahead and as the election grows near,

"generic polls"?

the gap will widen
with Bush pulling further ahead.

"further" ahead?

The real determining factors however
are... who is trusted to fight the war on terror and who is trusted to
run the economy. Bush is hands down favorite by huge margins in all
demos

"demos"?

other than blacks who for some reason think the demorats give a
damn about them. Some day they will realize that they were just played
like a fiddle but that could be a decade or two away.

Haha- Cheney voted against civil rights and has publicly slandered
Martin Luther King as a Communist agitator. Your Bush "fairy" campaigned
for the segregationist Winton Blount and his Alabama senate campaign
that year he was A.W.O.L. from the National Guard.

All the mindless bantering by the kooks here will be just more mental
masturbation as the election will go to Bush for the reason I gave
long ago.

"mental masturbation"? "kooks"?

In a time like this, no one in their right mind would
appoint an empty suit, resume building, wishy washy liberal from New
England to the highest office in the land. Alfred E. Neuman would have
been a better candidate than Kerry.

You do know *Newman* was a cartoon character?

The big question is, how long will the demorats as a party be so
detached from reality and mainstream America? Who will come forth from
the rubble and finally declare that the party has been hijacked by
socialist extremists and that there needs to be a rebuilding of the
party to reflect the values it once held when decent patriotic
pro-America men ran it.

Why don't you tell us what you actually *do*- other than shoot your
fucking blowhard mouth off- that could convince anyone you are decent,
patriotic, pro-American and/or a "man".

[...oh- shut the "F" up....]

 

[Rolavine]

I disagree with Jdurban about the outcome of the election. Bush is going down,
I can't believe that a majority of Americans will vote for a lying, total
failure, delusional drooler like Bush.

In times like this we need a real leader, not a lost boy.

Rocky

 

[Clarence]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
newsjrcn01hej3v0n0p2i85itr5lfteodn2gu@4ax.com...

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:24:39 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:

As usual, "John Fields" had nothing of value to contribute!

 

[Rich Grise]

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:56:10 +0000, Rolavine wrote:

I disagree with Jdurban about the outcome of the election. Bush is going down,
I can't believe that a majority of Americans will vote for a lying, total
failure, delusional drooler like Bush.

In times like this we need a real leader, not a lost boy.

The programming is very strong.

They're in a dilemma - as soon as they find out they're wrong, it's a
double-whammy, like an alcoholic at The Confrontation - they're not
only wrong, but they've been a complete fool about it!

So have compassion for them, for they know not what they do.

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:31:28 +0000, Clarence wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
newsjrcn01hej3v0n0p2i85itr5lfteodn2gu@4ax.com...
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:24:39 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:


As usual, "John Fields" had nothing of value to contribute!

Nah, it's just that he's an equal-opportunity pain in the ass.

Cheers!
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:09:28 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

more of the same crap

Fred, will you please clue up? Nitpicking their grammar just reinforces
their programming, that we're hostile and liars and don't have a legal
leg to stand on and all that bullshit. Just stick with the plain facts,
which are, Bush must go if America doesn't want to become the Fourth
Reich.

Thanks,
Rich

 

[Fred Bloggs]

Rich Grise wrote:

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:09:28 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

more of the same crap

Fred, will you please clue up? Nitpicking their grammar just reinforces
their programming, that we're hostile and liars and don't have a legal
leg to stand on and all that bullshit. Just stick with the plain facts,
which are, Bush must go if America doesn't want to become the Fourth
Reich.

Thanks,
Rich

There is no nitpicking to it- the idiot has no hint in hell what he's
talking about. You also appear to have a reading comprehension problem.
Here's the message for you: if you can't figure out what something says,
it means you're the problem. You and quite a few others here lack the
requisite background to understand most of the news- just because you
understand the words does not mean you understand the story. The idiot
Durban was clearly confusing a voter issue preference poll with an
election prediction poll, then the sub-intelligent idiot laughably
assumes a position of all-knowing authority on the subject. He is
clearly even more of a confused idiot than you are. If even 10% of what
he says about his career is true, his customers *have* to be some of the
biggest idiots in the world- morons.

 

[Rich Grise]

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:04:02 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

Rich Grise wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:09:28 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

more of the same crap

Fred, will you please clue up? Nitpicking their grammar just reinforces
their programming, that we're hostile and liars and don't have a legal
leg to stand on and all that bullshit. Just stick with the plain facts,
which are, Bush must go if America doesn't want to become the Fourth
Reich.

Thanks,
Rich

He is
clearly even more of a confused idiot than you are.

Yeah, thanks.
'Bye.

 

[Rich Grise]

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:13:01 -0700, Product developer wrote:

What I found was misery on a scale I have never seen before. This was
better than any course on mental illness could have revealed.

Of course you know, the cause of all that misery is your own denial
of your own Will, and of the Divine Will in general. This is how
you allow yourself to be duped by Ahriman, who tells you he's God.
You can't _feel_ the unlovingness.

But you can be healed, if you have intent to do so.

Good Luck!
Rich

 

[Fred Bloggs]

Product developer wrote:

Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<4177A5A5.9050604@nospam.com>...

Rich Grise wrote:

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:09:28 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

more of the same crap

Fred, will you please clue up? Nitpicking their grammar just reinforces
their programming, that we're hostile and liars and don't have a legal
leg to stand on and all that bullshit. Just stick with the plain facts,
which are, Bush must go if America doesn't want to become the Fourth
Reich.

Thanks,
Rich



There is no nitpicking to it- the idiot has no hint in hell what he's
talking about. You also appear to have a reading comprehension problem.
Here's the message for you: if you can't figure out what something says,
it means you're the problem. You and quite a few others here lack the
requisite background to understand most of the news- just because you
understand the words does not mean you understand the story. The idiot
Durban was clearly confusing a voter issue preference poll with an
election prediction poll, then the sub-intelligent idiot laughably
assumes a position of all-knowing authority on the subject. He is
clearly even more of a confused idiot than you are. If even 10% of what
he says about his career is true, his customers *have* to be some of the
biggest idiots in the world- morons.


If you had one tenth the IQ you would have understood the post.

Oh I understood the post well enough, you are a bs artist.

I
realize that you have never produced a commercially viable product not
even knowing what a beta test was so I won't rub it your face. My
customer list is a who's who of fortune 500 companies and a couple
dozen up and comers. I sit on boards of firms that you couldn't get
past the receptionist looking for a window washers position. Bottom
line is that your view of everyone else is through a loser's eyes.

I've noticed that zeroes like you break everyone down into winners and
loser with an obsession. You are really an insignificant no count, scam
artist, and crook.

Not
everyone is a "never been" like you sitting there wondering why life
is so unfair.

That statement indicates another aspect of your psychosis- you are such
a pathetic narcissist that you think everyone envies you and has a
nervous breakdown because they can't hope to achieve your stature. You
should get some help for that.

It has been enlightening playing with you. I am spoiled
in my sheltered world of good and decent people that I work and play
with.

Your candidate has done more than a few things that will eventually
cause your hollow world of specious crap to collapse- and this will
happen quite soon. Can't say I will be sad to see your kind go.

I just had to see what was in the mind of someone like you.

What I found was misery on a scale I have never seen before. This was
better than any course on mental illness could have revealed.

Is that Mental Illness 101 at the local community college? Maybe you can
apply your great genius to making a Mental Illness detector- on sale now
at WalMart for...........$14.99. I can't say I have learned much by
wasting my time on someone as dull as you.