R
Robert Roland
Guest
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:01:10 +0100, "N_Cook" <diverse@tcp.co.uk> wrote:
speed (and other parameters) is configured in the same way you would a
physical serial port.
newer versions of Windows. If you get a genuine one, you'll be fine.
FTDI and SiLabs also work well in my experience.
microcontroller in the converter to transmit and receive data at a
specific rate. As mentioned, you do that just as if it was a physical
serial port. The driver takes care of the rest.
--
RoRo
The driver will provide you with a virtual serial port. This port'sOr the other similar I was looking at has active chipset conversion in the
adapter, but always seems to refer to fast serial links useage, I've not
seen specifically as low as 9600.
speed (and other parameters) is configured in the same way you would a
physical serial port.
As Geoffrey explains, the knockoff Prolific chips are troublesome onAnd whether Prolific or FTDI chipsets, seems to be horses for courses, and
reading around this topic a number of people seem to end up with the wrong
horse.
newer versions of Windows. If you get a genuine one, you'll be fine.
FTDI and SiLabs also work well in my experience.
You don't want to slow down the USB data rate. You want to tell theIf it was possible to slow down the USB then just wasted some driver
download time if no connection emerges
microcontroller in the converter to transmit and receive data at a
specific rate. As mentioned, you do that just as if it was a physical
serial port. The driver takes care of the rest.
--
RoRo