OT: The Hillary Clinton campaign indicted for spying on Trump...

On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 1:51:33 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
The chronic liar John Doe cannot be reasoned with.

When you refute its lies, it simply makes up more lies to cover its prior
lies. It\'s fiction never ends. Utterly pointless, that\'s why so few people
reply to the troll.

I have corrected the text to bring it closer to reality, not that John Doe has any actual connection to the real world.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:b1ada96e-91f7-4d51-a772-59210ffda8ean@googlegroups.com:

Since he is convinced that all his bizarre delusions are
irrefutable truths, he wouldn\'t see any point of debating their
validity even if he could master the concept of the debate.

More bad English from the fool that wants to NUKE HIS OWN COUNTRY
! ! !

The grammar and composition of that sentence is 100% fine, as is the
content. Your response, however, was an improperly structured
sentence.
 
On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 6:45:52 AM UTC-8, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:b1ada96e-91f7-4d51...@googlegroups.com:
Since he is convinced that all his bizarre delusions are
irrefutable truths, he wouldn\'t see any point of debating their
validity even if he could master the concept of the debate.

More bad English from the fool that wants to NUKE HIS OWN COUNTRY
! ! !

The grammar and composition of that sentence is 100% fine, as is the
content. Your response, however, was an improperly structured
sentence.

You are Crazy Cranky Creep. DDD FFF SSS
 
Actually \"John Doe\" is an ancient tribal name, given to a brave who helped
protect young deer from unscrupulous hunters.

Mine are not perceptions, they are explanations. JOHN DURHAM\'S perceptions
about what took place is the problem for cannibal leftists like Always Wrong
and Bozo Bill.

To be continued...
 
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
news:suumvt$2u9$1@dont-email.me:

Actually \"John Doe\" is an ancient tribal name, given to a brave
who helped protect young deer from unscrupulous hunters.

Horseshit. It was never that. Got a cite to substantiate your
claim, dufus?

> Mine are not perceptions, they are explanations.

Yours are 100% convoluted.

JOHN DURHAM\'S
perceptions about what took place is the problem for cannibal
leftists like Always Wrong and Bozo Bill.

You obviously have not listened to everything he said, and hopped
onto the Fox NONnews stupidity surrounding it.

> To be continued...

Which decidedly is why everyone here thinks that you are an abject
idiot.
 
On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 11:51:52 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
> I wonder if Bill thinks trolling USENET will help his cause.

It\'s not a delusion that I share with John Doe. Since John Doe is the troll here - though he seems think that what he does isn\'t trolling - he has got the concept backwards.

> Maybe the cannibal leftist loves losing.

There aren\'t any cannibal leftists. Even the most doctrinaire leftist knows that eating people is wrong.

John Doe is far enough to the right that he seems to think that 95% of the population is left-wing. About 95% of the population is saner than he is, so they don\'t share his right-wing delusions, but that doesn\'t make them all that left-wing.

John Doe is a doctrinaire rightist, and he doesn\'t know much, which leads him to make remarkably absurd claims. He\'s probably clinically insane - whence the enthusiasm for cannibalism - but it isn\'t something one can make a reliable judgement about based only on text-only messages.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 5:37:08 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 12:07:02 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 5:03:15 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 7:54:35 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
I don\'t debate anything with chronic liars, it\'s a complete waste of time.


Bill Sloman is an attention-craving chronic liar who cannot be reasoned with...

John Doe doesn\'t debate anything with anybody. He doesn\'t understand what debating is about.

Hey SNIPPERMAN, you would flunk THIRD GRADE English with that prose!
I do hate making typo\'s, but you don\'t tend to get flunked for that kind of errror.
Since he is convinced that all his bizarre delusions are irrefutable truths, he wouldn\'t see any point of debating their validity even if he could master the concept of the debate.

More bad English from the fool that wants to NUKE HIS OWN COUNTRY ! ! !
Flyguy can\'t parse complex sentences, and seems to think that the US government that carried out numerous nuclear tests within the continental United States were all fools. I was just proposing a practical application of the techniques tested - with 31 nuclear explosions - in project Plowshare.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

Flyguy is dedicated to maintaining his status as the groups most flagrant idiot, though John Doe isn\'t far behind.

Sorry, SNIPPERMAN, YOU are the reigning FLAGRANT IDIOT ! ! !

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 3:08:05 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 5:37:08 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 12:07:02 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 5:03:15 PM UTC-8, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 7:54:35 AM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
I don\'t debate anything with chronic liars, it\'s a complete waste of time.


Bill Sloman is an attention-craving chronic liar who cannot be reasoned with...

John Doe doesn\'t debate anything with anybody. He doesn\'t understand what debating is about.

Hey Sloman, you would flunk THIRD GRADE English with that prose!

I do hate making typo\'s, but you don\'t tend to get flunked for that kind of errror.

Since he is convinced that all his bizarre delusions are irrefutable truths, he wouldn\'t see any point of debating their validity even if he could master the concept of the debate.

More bad English from the fool that wants to NUKE HIS OWN COUNTRY ! ! !

Flyguy can\'t parse complex sentences, and seems to think that the US government that carried out numerous nuclear tests within the continental United States were all fools. I was just proposing a practical application of the techniques tested - with 31 nuclear explosions - in project Plowshare.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

Flyguy is dedicated to maintaining his status as the groups most flagrant idiot, though John Doe isn\'t far behind.

Sorry, Sloman, YOU are the reigning FLAGRANT IDIOT ! ! !

Of course Flyguy does like to assert that, but if he wasn\'t such a flagrant idiot, he wouldn\'t bother.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 at 4:32:53 PM UTC+11, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
John Robertson <sp...@flippers.com> wrote in news:v8SdnVWkw65x3on_...@giganews.com:
On 2022/02/21 4:59 p.m., Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, February 22, 2022 at 5:38:43 AM UTC+11, StupidAsStupidGet wrote:
On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 5:40:29 AM UTC-8,
bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 8:08:31 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

And, if one is using the bird comparison - right wing AND left
wing are essential to level flight. They balance off each
other...either wing, by itself, plummets to their doom.

Except that for political parties it\'s more of a military analogy.

The elected representatives are a kind of mini-army, and they attack the problems of the state across a broad front.

The left wants to make sure that everybody is looked after, and wants to change things to make sure that even more people get helped than did when there was less help to spread around. The right is more cautious, and doesn\'t want to change anything much at all, if it doesn\'t something in it for their particluar supporters.

Conservatives need liberals, and liberals need conservatives, so
life can reach a balance of wants, needs, and what is possible.

Not exactly. The rabid liberals are a bit too adventurous, and the stubborn conservatives don\'t want to change anything at all, though their ideas of how things used to work aren\'t always that well founded, and some of them want to revert to a particularly primitive and simple state that never actually existed.

A certain amount of compromise - sold on the basis that it give the nut-jobs at either extreme something to claim as a win - can keep the government moving in a sensible direction.

+1 Oh, and plus one:

Well, those wings need a body with muscles to attach to and be driven by..

That\'s not the way it works. In Europe, with proportional representation, you end up with a bunch of parties spread across the political spectrum, and coalition governments formed by alliances between some of the parties. The coalitions pretty much have to include a couple of middle-of-the-road parties to get the numbers to get legislation passed, but they don\'t have to be all that symmetrical.

> We need a third party. The keel of the ship, as it were.

Not really. There are sensible people across most of the political spectrum..

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
John Robertson wrote:

And, if one is using the bird comparison - right wing AND left wing are
essential to level flight. They balance off each other...either wing, by
itself, plummets to their doom.

That\'s amusing. Perhaps it is in those terms\' etymology.

Conservatives need liberals, and liberals need conservatives, so life
can reach a balance of wants, needs, and what is possible.

Unless one is broken, then the bird crashes.

Yes, we certainly do need at least two viable political parties.
 
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
news:sv3kb9$fhd$3@dont-email.me:

John Robertson wrote:

And, if one is using the bird comparison - right wing AND left
wing are essential to level flight. They balance off each
other...either wing, by itself, plummets to their doom.

That\'s amusing. Perhaps it is in those terms\' etymology.

Conservatives need liberals, and liberals need conservatives, so
life can reach a balance of wants, needs, and what is possible.

Unless one is broken, then the bird crashes.

Yes, we certainly do need at least two viable political parties.

I guess that leaves your whore mother out. She isn\'t viable and failed
to flush her worst mistake... you.
 
Sorry, on the eleventh.
The Senate Republican response was one week later.
 
https://youtu.be/U00rfjdjrzo

6:27

Judicial Watch\'s Tom Fitton on Fox News.

\"The Great Suppression\"

No big deal, but it\'s a fun interview.
 
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 at 7:31:06 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
This is for human consumption <snipped the rest, which was pretty much the usual nonsense

It\'s clear that the target audience is brain-damaged humans. Only people who - like you - who are sufficiently cognitively damaged to be utterly gullible could possibly taken any of it seriously.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top