B
bitrex
Guest
On 12/27/2021 6:16 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
I think the risk is pretty small, most major chain retail employees are
smart enough to realize they don\'t get paid enough to physically engage
with criminals. The ones who aren\'t sometimes don\'t listen too good,
anyway. A company policy doesn\'t mean nobody can ever find you liable
for something.
I think in general they don\'t want employees going outside their zone of
responsibility for organizational reasons as much as potential liability
reasons. Amateur security services isn\'t what we pay you for, we have a
vastly overpaid store security department for efficiently harassing
paying customers and eating ding-dongs all day, and a whole local police
department dedicated to running make-work sting operations instead of
catching any real criminals.
tirsdag den 28. december 2021 kl. 00.08.46 UTC+1 skrev bitrex:
On 12/27/2021 5:49 PM, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
mandag den 27. december 2021 kl. 23.38.06 UTC+1 skrev bitrex:
On 12/27/2021 5:16 PM, Spehro Pefhany wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 14:15:06 -0700, Don Y
blocked...@foo.invalid> wrote:
On 12/27/2021 12:51 PM, bitrex wrote:
Capture/conviction rates for bank robberies are high -- yet
folks still try to rob banks! Clearly, \"the word\" hasn\'t
gotten out sufficiently to deter them...
They think banks still keep large amounts of cash sitting around all the time
like Bonnie & Clyde days, when many bank branches in 2021 probably don\'t have
that much more readily-accessible currency on hand at any particular time than
the average large convenience store; the Brinks truck does a couple runs a day
to my local branch and I figure that is mostly pulling cash out, not many go to
a branch bank to do large cash withdrawals, anymore.
I imagine not many go to make large cash *deposits*, either!
When I use cash as a form of payment (esp for big ticket items)
it\'s almost as if they are afraid to handle it.
I\'ve tended to assume much of the jewelry you see in display cases in jewelry
stores in relatively insecure locations like shopping malls are \"display
models\" but I\'ve never bought high-end jewelry from a place like that, and it\'s
not information I suppose any particular store gives out to random people.
There are increasingly more common thefts of \"other stuff\". Cigarettes
being one \"high value, low mass\" item (a friend said a carton of smokes is
close to $90? That sounds high... why not just snort coke? :-/ )
You can get a feel for what stores consider as high theft (value) items
by seeing what they keep locked up. E.g., Ace tends to keep it\'s small
hand tools in a locked display case -- no doubt they would grow legs,
otherwise.
OTOH, I noticed Home Despot had gensets in a locked case. Do folks often
slip one under their shirt and waltz out of the store??!
There are videos of guys sticking big Dewalt table saws and such like
into carts and just walking/running out the door.
If the workers are told not to intervene then locking them up is one
way to reduce losses. They\'re also working on being able to remotely
brick them.
However, when you go into a store and all the wrenches and such like
are in locked cabinets it makes you want to not return to that
particular store.
Nah they only people the big-box retail stores tends to really want the
book thrown at if they\'re caught stealing is their own employees.
Management is unlikely to give an employee even a 1% cash reward if they
prevent $5000 worth of stuff from being stolen but God help that
employee if they steal $50.
they don\'t want to get stuck with the bill for an employee getting hurt
trying to stop a thief
How much they\'ve actually had to pay out in practice for employees
getting injured in this circumstance before whenever whatever chain made
a policy about it IDK, I bet it was asymptotically close to zero dollars.
you don\'t have to pay out to realize that something is a risk of having to pay out
I think the risk is pretty small, most major chain retail employees are
smart enough to realize they don\'t get paid enough to physically engage
with criminals. The ones who aren\'t sometimes don\'t listen too good,
anyway. A company policy doesn\'t mean nobody can ever find you liable
for something.
I think in general they don\'t want employees going outside their zone of
responsibility for organizational reasons as much as potential liability
reasons. Amateur security services isn\'t what we pay you for, we have a
vastly overpaid store security department for efficiently harassing
paying customers and eating ding-dongs all day, and a whole local police
department dedicated to running make-work sting operations instead of
catching any real criminals.