OT:Sinclair Broadcasting True Believers

[Jim Yanik]

Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote in
newsan.2004.10.22.05.56.36.813235@example.net:

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 00:30:40 +0000, Jim Yanik wrote:

Robert Monsen <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in
...
Thus, I'd suggest everybody make their own "Ann Coulter" anagrams
rather than using the site. It's more fun anyway.

How adult.

Probablly, Mr. Self-Righteous. More adult than the two-year-old you're
presenting here.

When us adults go to have fun, we bring our inner child with us, so
we can protect him from the snakes and arrows of reality while playing
and running free.

Some people allow their "inner child" to take over,too,and lose touch with
reality.


--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net

 

[Fred Bloggs]

Clarence wrote:

"Rolavine" <rolavine@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041019093841.22466.00001098@mb-m06.aol.com...

From: "Clarence" no@No.com
Date: 10/18/2004 11:56 PM

"Rolavine" <rolavine@aol.com> wrote in message

Sounds like Kerry can finish them off easy after he is elected!
This is why fanatics shouldn't be allowed to run corporations or countries

for

that matter! In either case it is the investors that get screwed!
Rocky

I agree, a fanatic like Kerry will run ripshod over the First Amendment!


I was just kidding about Kerry taking them out, sheesh. But they are playing

a

dangerous game if Kerry does get elected. Heck the Bush Admin owns the FCC,
they got Colin Powell's son heading it.


I never kid about the 1st and 2nd Amendments. As with the entire bill of
rights that is serious stuff.


But from what I can tell the first amendment has become more an excuse for
lobbiests these days, and less a real thing. Heck a true free press would

have

ripped Bush into small pieces and flushed him long ago for the boob he is.


In this country there is no free press, the vast majority of the press is
"Liberal" and every so often they get caught!

Free speech was intended to include all political discussion or it is not free.

snipped aside comments

Anyway, Sinclair's decision is not good for their investors.


As a stock holder, I disagree. With the price fluctuation, by buying
additional shares I stand to profit a great deal more. But you don't trade on
the market, do you? Beta over 2 makes for profit potential!

Good logic- please buy as much Sinclair as you can get your hands on.

 

[Robert Monsen]

Rich Grise wrote:

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:24:56 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

The very spelling DemocRATS indicates a psychological disorder- rats
have not done too well in the way of symbolizing anything much embraced
by society, more like a symbol of disease and filth to be "eradicated".
The worst the Democrats say- and it happens to be VERY true, is that the
..."R"..."P"..."E"..."B"..."I"..."U"..."L"..."C"..."A"..."N"


What the fuck is a "rpebiulcan"?

Thanks,
Rich

it's a blonde, blue eyed anagram for 'unclean rot'.

<http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=ann+coulter&include=UNCLEAN&exclude=&d=&n=&m=&source=adv&a=y&l=n&language=english&where=>

or (protect your eyes first)

<http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=ann+coulter&include=cunt&exclude=&d=&n=&m=&source=adv&a=y&l=n&language=english&where=>

--
Regards,
Robert Monsen

"Your Highness, I have no need of this hypothesis."
- Pierre Laplace (1749-1827), to Napoleon,
on why his works on celestial mechanics make no mention of God.