OT:Sinclair Broadcasting True Believers

R

Rolavine

Guest
Sinclair Broadcasting takes a beating
By David Lieberman and James Cox, USA TODAY
Sinclair Broadcasting (SBGI) continues to feel heat from Wall Street as the
company's 62 television stations prepare this week to air Stolen Honor: Wounds
That Never Heal, a documentary critical of Democratic presidential nominee John
Kerry's Vietnam-era activities.
Shares closed Monday at $6.49, down 55 cents since Friday — and down 12%
since Oct. 11, the first day of trading after the Los Angeles Times disclosed
Sinclair's plans.

Lehman Bros. cut its 12-month price target to $9 from $10 as analyst William
Meyers noted in a report that airing the documentary "has no upside and only
multi-dimensional downside" for the company — for example by alienating
advertisers and regulators.

But that's not Sinclair's only business problem — nor its only experience
with controversy.

Sinclair's financial woes were highlighted Monday in J.P. Morgan's decision to
initiate coverage with an "underweight" rating that indicates it is expected to
under-perform its peer group.

"In our conversation with management, we detected substantial frustration with
the company's stock price," analyst Barton Crockett says. Sinclair's stock is
down 56.7% year-to-date compared with the S&P 500's rise of 0.2% for the year.
He adds that Sinclair may consider trying to go private but would be hindered
by its debt.

Among the decisions that raised the ire of many investors and public-interest
advocates:

• Since 2002 Sinclair has produced and distributed costly news and mostly
conservative-opinion segments, called News Central, about national and
international affairs for stations' local newscasts. While Sinclair describes
the package as a cheaper way to offer news, analysts question why its small
stations need to air news at all.

• Also related to news, in at least 11 regulatory filings last year and this
year, Sinclair blamed the Iraq war for $2.2 million in lost ad revenue.
Sinclair's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission say the Iraq
conflict prompted advertisers to cancel or forced stations to pre-empt ads for
news.

• Until last summer, Sinclair has vigorously opposed the transition to
digital television. The company said it wanted a technical standard that would
make it easier for homes to receive over-the-air signals on indoor antennas.
But critics said Sinclair put its interests ahead of the country's, and angered
regulators, by trying to put off the expense of converting to digital TV.

• Sinclair has an ongoing battle with Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/PUSH Coalition.
The group has asked the Federal Communications Commission to rescind some
Sinclair station licenses and keep it from buying more. The group says Sinclair
used a minority-run company it controls to improperly create duopolies —
ownership of two TV stations in a market — in cities such as Oklahoma City
and Dayton, Ohio.

In a seeming counterattack, Sinclair has asked a Georgia court for permission
to review videotapes submitted in a lawsuit against Rainbow/PUSH by a former
employee.

• Investors also challenged Sinclair's decision in 2002 to invest $20 million
in Summa Holdings, an auto dealership controlled by CEO David Smith. This year
Sinclair said it would make no additional investments in Summa.

Sinclair didn't return calls.

Sounds like Kerry can finish them off easy after he is elected!
This is why fanatics shouldn't be allowed to run corporations or countries for
that matter!
In either case it is the investors that get screwed!

Rocky
 
"Rolavine" <rolavine@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041019025040.29613.00000979@mb-m05.aol.com...
Sounds like Kerry can finish them off easy after he is elected!
This is why fanatics shouldn't be allowed to run corporations or countries
for
that matter! In either case it is the investors that get screwed!
Rocky
I agree, a fanatic like Kerry will run ripshod over the First Amendment!
 
From: "Clarence" no@No.com
Date: 10/18/2004 11:56 PM

"Rolavine" <rolavine@aol.com> wrote in message

Sounds like Kerry can finish them off easy after he is elected!
This is why fanatics shouldn't be allowed to run corporations or countries
for
that matter! In either case it is the investors that get screwed!
Rocky

I agree, a fanatic like Kerry will run ripshod over the First Amendment!

I was just kidding about Kerry taking them out, sheesh. But they are playing a
dangerous game if Kerry does get elected. Heck the Bush Admin owns the FCC,
they got Colin Powell's son heading it.

But from what I can tell the first amendment has become more an excuse for
lobbiests these days, and less a real thing. Heck a true free press would have
ripped Bush into small pieces and flushed him long ago for the boob he is.

Even in the Debate coverage, Kerry is faulted for not adding the new govt jobs
to his job loss total (I don't think they should count anyway), and in a tit
for tat Bush is forgiven for saying that 75% of Al Qaida leaders have been
captured or killed.

This is like saying that a lie about a B.J. is equivalent to a lie about WMD,
that a quiet private sexual encounter is the same as producing evidence so you
can have a war.

Anyway, Sinclair's decision is not good for their investors.
 
"Rolavine" <rolavine@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041019093841.22466.00001098@mb-m06.aol.com...
From: "Clarence" no@No.com
Date: 10/18/2004 11:56 PM

"Rolavine" <rolavine@aol.com> wrote in message

Sounds like Kerry can finish them off easy after he is elected!
This is why fanatics shouldn't be allowed to run corporations or countries
for
that matter! In either case it is the investors that get screwed!
Rocky

I agree, a fanatic like Kerry will run ripshod over the First Amendment!

I was just kidding about Kerry taking them out, sheesh. But they are playing
a
dangerous game if Kerry does get elected. Heck the Bush Admin owns the FCC,
they got Colin Powell's son heading it.
I never kid about the 1st and 2nd Amendments. As with the entire bill of
rights that is serious stuff.

But from what I can tell the first amendment has become more an excuse for
lobbiests these days, and less a real thing. Heck a true free press would
have
ripped Bush into small pieces and flushed him long ago for the boob he is.
In this country there is no free press, the vast majority of the press is
"Liberal" and every so often they get caught!

Free speech was intended to include all political discussion or it is not free.

<snipped aside comments>

Anyway, Sinclair's decision is not good for their investors.
As a stock holder, I disagree. With the price fluctuation, by buying
additional shares I stand to profit a great deal more. But you don't trade on
the market, do you? Beta over 2 makes for profit potential!
 
rom: "Clarence" no@No.com
Date: 10/19/2004 10:23 AM Pacific

In this country there is no free press, the vast majority of the press is
"Liberal" and every so often they get caught!

I guess I missed that while looking at an endless host of Republican
Spokespeople on my TV. Honest given an objective media, what do you suppose
should have been said about a President that said the 75% of Al Qaida leaders
have been captured or killed time after time? I would thing the term 'Pig
Ignorant Lying Bastard' would be about right! I keep looking for this mythical
liberal media but evey time I see a glimpse of it it is sanwiched between two
asswipes from the Heritage foundation.

Free speech was intended to include all political discussion or it is not
free.

snipped aside comments

Anyway, Sinclair's decision is not good for their investors.

As a stock holder, I disagree. With the price fluctuation, by buying
additional shares I stand to profit a great deal more. But you don't trade
on
the market, do you? Beta over 2 makes for profit potential!

So your actually going to risk more on Sinclair? Wow you are as crazy a gambler
as Bush is, you risk you money and he tosses the bones of our troops.


Rocky
 
"Rolavine" <rolavine@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041019135541.21613.00002462@mb-m10.aol.com...
rom: "Clarence" no@No.com
Date: 10/19/2004 10:23 AM Pacific

sniped BS
As a stock holder, I disagree. With the price fluctuation, by buying
additional shares I stand to profit a great deal more. But you don't trade
on
the market, do you? Beta over 2 makes for profit potential!

So your actually going to risk more on Sinclair? Wow you are as crazy a
gambler
as Bush is, you risk you money and he tosses the bones of our troops.
Rocky
I don't gamble, I make money on prices going down, and prices going up. But I
do not "bet the farm" So If I lose a little on a deal, (Always put a stop loss
in place) I make it up somewhere else.

You really do not invest, do you?
 
"Tom Seim" <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6c71b322.0410191356.1debd7c7@posting.google.com...
rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine) wrote in message
news:<20041019093841.22466.00001098@mb-m06.aol.com>...
From: "Clarence" no@No.com
Date: 10/18/2004 11:56 PM
<sniped excess>

Pissing off 30% of your customers is not smart business.
Unless your performing a REAL service for the 70%?
 
From: "Clarence" no@No.com
Date: 10/19/2004 4:35 PM Pacific
"Tom Seim" <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote
rolavine@aol.com (Rolavine)
From: "Clarence" no@No.com
Date: 10/18/2004 11:56 PM

sniped excess

Pissing off 30% of your customers is not smart business.

Thanks for your agreement but 30% is a pretty low estimate.

Unless your performing a REAL service for the 70%?

Oh yeah we got so much verifiable truth from the swift boat liars that they
deserve to make their baseless charges again for free! Please, give me a break.

Even if you hate Kerry, showing blatant propaganda as news sets a dangerous
precedent. One that may hurt your side more than it helps it in the long run.
 
In article <iGBdd.16651$nj.14620@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
Clarence <no@No.com> wrote:
[....]
Only DemocRATS HATE.
Now there's a silly statement! Do you actually believe that. If so get
help.


--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
Ken Smith wrote:
In article <iGBdd.16651$nj.14620@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
Clarence <no@No.com> wrote:
[....]

Only DemocRATS HATE.


Now there's a silly statement! Do you actually believe that. If so get
help.
The very spelling DemocRATS indicates a psychological disorder- rats
have not done too well in the way of symbolizing anything much embraced
by society, more like a symbol of disease and filth to be "eradicated".
The worst the Democrats say- and it happens to be VERY true, is that the
"R" in Republican stands for Racist. Okay- so "P" stands for Pig - "E"
stands for Elitist- "B" stands for Blowhard- "I" stands for Idiot- "U"
stands for Uneducable- "L" stands for Liar- "C" stands for Corrupt- "A"
stands for Asinine-"N" stands for Ninny because so many of them are such
goody-goody two shoes.
 
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:24:56 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:
The very spelling DemocRATS indicates a psychological disorder- rats
have not done too well in the way of symbolizing anything much embraced
by society, more like a symbol of disease and filth to be "eradicated".
The worst the Democrats say- and it happens to be VERY true, is that the
..."R"..."P"..."E"..."B"..."I"..."U"..."L"..."C"..."A"..."N"
What the fuck is a "rpebiulcan"?

Thanks,
Rich
 
"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.10.21.03.15.36.978957@example.net...
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:24:56 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

The very spelling DemocRATS indicates a psychological disorder- rats
have not done too well in the way of symbolizing anything much embraced
by society, more like a symbol of disease and filth to be "eradicated".
The worst the Democrats say- and it happens to be VERY true, is that the
..."R"..."P"..."E"..."B"..."I"..."U"..."L"..."C"..."A"..."N"

What the fuck is a "rpebiulcan"?
Thanks,
Rich
Why reply to FB.
I Killfiled him due to a lack of any meaningful content in his posts a long
time ago.

He is so far out in left field he is no longer in the real world.

I don't think he's a DemocRAT, since he doesn't know what it means.


---
Clarence
 
From: "Clarence" no@No.com

Only DemocRATS HATE.
Really, and I suppose only Repiglicans can love too? then it is no wonder why
we hate, lol.
I got to tell you I'm a Democrat and I love my sweetie, my kids, my dog, my
neighbors, myself and the universe.

I just think Kerry is not someone I trust. He seem to
think as long as he says what he thinks is a hot button political issue he
should be elected.
Oh yeah, and Bush is not doing that? Both teams have a long list of clever
weasels that are churning out the key words and testing them. When they are
baked to perfection they get served up. We have long since gone beyond simple
honesty, and this campaign is a war of competing advertising firms.

But when you look behind the BS, your left with two real men. They are both
lying to you, but one sets no limits for his lies, he will say '75% of Al Qaida
leaders captured or killed' with a straight face. And that same one won't even
appear before an open crowd, he appears only to pre selected true believers,
just like Benny Hinn. This same one has a 4 year history of lying to us too.
And he has flopped on Iraq so many times that no one even knows why we started
this war anymore, while accusing the other of being a flopper.

I disagree. Plus I think he has missed two that I feel
are
important
Prob. Guns, Gays, or God?

and that he will do more harm than good for this Republic!

Tell me what has Bush done to earn your loyalty. I have ten thousand reasons
why he has earned my contempt.
 
"Robert Monsen" <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:T4Jdd.402529$mD.18472@attbi_s02...
Rich Grise wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:24:56 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

The very spelling DemocRATS indicates a psychological disorder- rats
have not done too well in the way of symbolizing anything much embraced
by society, more like a symbol of disease and filth to be "eradicated".
The worst the Democrats say- and it happens to be VERY true, is that the
..."R"..."P"..."E"..."B"..."I"..."U"..."L"..."C"..."A"..."N"


What the fuck is a "rpebiulcan"?

Thanks,
Rich


it's a blonde, blue eyed anagram for 'unclean rot'.


http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=ann+coulter&include=UNCLE
AN&exclude=&d=&n=&m=&source=adv&a=y&l=n&language=english&where=>
or (protect your eyes first)


http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=ann+coulter&include=cunt&
exclude=&d=&n=&m=&source=adv&a=y&l=n&language=english&where=>
--
Regards,
Robert Monsen
My security software blocked both URL's.

What was in them other than the display material.

If you were able to view them, check for a Trojan, or Virus to be safe.






--
A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the
people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.
Thomas Jefferson
 
Rich Grise wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:24:56 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

The very spelling DemocRATS indicates a psychological disorder- rats
have not done too well in the way of symbolizing anything much embraced
by society, more like a symbol of disease and filth to be "eradicated".
The worst the Democrats say- and it happens to be VERY true, is that the
..."R"..."P"..."E"..."B"..."I"..."U"..."L"..."C"..."A"..."N"


What the fuck is a "rpebiulcan"?

Thanks,
Rich

That's how Republicans spell it.
 
Clarence wrote:
"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.10.21.03.15.36.978957@example.net...

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:24:56 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

The very spelling DemocRATS indicates a psychological disorder- rats
have not done too well in the way of symbolizing anything much embraced
by society, more like a symbol of disease and filth to be "eradicated".
The worst the Democrats say- and it happens to be VERY true, is that the
..."R"..."P"..."E"..."B"..."I"..."U"..."L"..."C"..."A"..."N"

What the fuck is a "rpebiulcan"?
Thanks,
Rich


Why reply to FB.
I Killfiled him due to a lack of any meaningful content in his posts a long
time ago.

He is so far out in left field he is no longer in the real world.

I don't think he's a DemocRAT, since he doesn't know what it means.

Nah- you got your weasel ass kicked because you don't a whole lot.
 
"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.10.21.17.40.23.993405@example.net...
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:16:15 +0000, Clarence wrote:


"Robert Monsen" <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:T4Jdd.402529$mD.18472@attbi_s02...
Rich Grise wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:24:56 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

The very spelling DemocRATS indicates a psychological disorder- rats
have not done too well in the way of symbolizing anything much embraced
by society, more like a symbol of disease and filth to be "eradicated".
The worst the Democrats say- and it happens to be VERY true, is that the
..."R"..."P"..."E"..."B"..."I"..."U"..."L"..."C"..."A"..."N"


What the fuck is a "rpebiulcan"?

Thanks,
Rich


it's a blonde, blue eyed anagram for 'unclean rot'.



http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=ann+coulter&include=UNCLE
AN&exclude=&d=&n=&m=&source=adv&a=y&l=n&language=english&where=

or (protect your eyes first)



http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=ann+coulter&include=cunt&
exclude=&d=&n=&m=&source=adv&a=y&l=n&language=english&where=

--
Regards,
Robert Monsen

My security software blocked both URL's.

What was in them other than the display material.

If you were able to view them, check for a Trojan, or Virus to be safe.

It's OK, Clarence. Big Brother is protecting you from what he doesn't like
you to see.

Aren't you glad we live in a dictatorship? Cradle-to-grave guaranteed
security, you never have to think or anything, just consume. And vote
for Big Brother, of course.

Thanks,
Rich

"MY" software Which I installed, reported ("Spyware" "Trojan" or "Virus") on
this site. "Access Blocked." This has only happened two times. Both times
it was justified.
 
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:01:22 +0000, Clarence wrote:
"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.10.21.17.40.23.993405@example.net...

Aren't you glad we live in a dictatorship? Cradle-to-grave guaranteed
security, you never have to think or anything, just consume. And vote
for Big Brother, of course.

"MY" software Which I installed, reported ("Spyware" "Trojan" or "Virus") on
this site. "Access Blocked." This has only happened two times. Both times
it was justified.
Yeah - the software you need because you're running Little Big Brother's
GUI trojan in lieu of an OS.

Cheers!
Rich
 
Robert Monsen <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in
news:37Udd.435674$Fg5.96458@attbi_s53:

Clarence wrote:
"Robert Monsen" <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:T4Jdd.402529$mD.18472@attbi_s02...

Rich Grise wrote:

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:24:56 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:


The very spelling DemocRATS indicates a psychological disorder-
rats have not done too well in the way of symbolizing anything much
embraced by society, more like a symbol of disease and filth to be
"eradicated". The worst the Democrats say- and it happens to be
VERY true, is that the
..."R"..."P"..."E"..."B"..."I"..."U"..."L"..."C"..."A"..."N"


What the fuck is a "rpebiulcan"?

Thanks,
Rich


it's a blonde, blue eyed anagram for 'unclean rot'.



http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=ann+coulter&incl
ude=UNCLE
AN&exclude=&d=&n=&m=&source=adv&a=y&l=n&language=english&where=

or (protect your eyes first)



http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=ann+coulter&incl
ude=cunt&
exclude=&d=&n=&m=&source=adv&a=y&l=n&language=english&where=

--
Regards,
Robert Monsen


My security software blocked both URL's.

What was in them other than the display material.

If you were able to view them, check for a Trojan, or Virus to be
safe.



Actually, thanks for the tip, Norton AntiVirus found a virus on my
machine this morning on the overnight scan.

Thus, I'd suggest everybody make their own "Ann Coulter" anagrams
rather than using the site. It's more fun anyway.
How adult.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
 
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 00:30:40 +0000, Jim Yanik wrote:

Robert Monsen <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in
....
Thus, I'd suggest everybody make their own "Ann Coulter" anagrams
rather than using the site. It's more fun anyway.

How adult.
Probablly, Mr. Self-Righteous. More adult than the two-year-old you're
presenting here.

When us adults go to have fun, we bring our inner child with us, so
we can protect him from the snakes and arrows of reality while playing
and running free.

We don't place him out as front guard, and ask him to do our job
of navigating the shoals of our life on our behalf.

IOW, I see you doing your own inner life-force a disservice.

But, you have free will, so you're free to abuse yourself until you
get tired of it.

Good Luck!
Rich
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top