OT: Papal definitions?

[Glenn Ashmore]

A 4 handicapper? That is positively *evil*! Only Republicans play that
well.

Unfortunately. When we talked last August at a get together of old rockers
he was showing all the symptoms.

Strange how the "wild" rock 'n rollers turn out when they get old. One of
the wildest I ever knew now runs a low country spice and seasonings company
in Charleston, SC., deacon in the Episcopal church and runs the soup kitchen
2 days a week.

--
Glenn Ashmore

I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack
there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com
Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com

 

[keith]

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:37:47 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:46:29 -0400, keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:58:52 -0400, Glenn Ashmore wrote:

"Ban" <bansuri@web.de> wrote in message
news:VHpce.838526$b5.37152423@news3.tin.it...
And finally Alice Cooper shares his pedophil passion with a lot of
Catholic priests, doesn't he?

Now that is more than a little ofer the top. Alice is actually a pretty
regular guy. About as close to a Rotarian as you can get. A 4 handicap
golfer and active in Pheonix comunity and religious affairs.

A 4 handicapper? That is positively *evil*! Only Republicans play that
well.

You doubted that Alice wasn't Republican ?

Well, no. This thread made the other-half smile though. ...and she's a
few notches to the right of even me. ;-)

--
Keith

 

[keith]

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 07:52:30 -0400, Glenn Ashmore wrote:

A 4 handicapper? That is positively *evil*! Only Republicans play that
well.

Unfortunately. When we talked last August at a get together of old rockers
he was showing all the symptoms.

Unfortunately? Maybe *he* grew up!

Strange how the "wild" rock 'n rollers turn out when they get old. One of
the wildest I ever knew now runs a low country spice and seasonings company
in Charleston, SC., deacon in the Episcopal church and runs the soup kitchen
2 days a week.

Ohh, is he going to vote to dump the NH bishop?

--
Keith

 

[Brad Albing]

Rich Grise wrote:

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:58:52 -0400, Glenn Ashmore wrote:

Underneath the make-up, most of "those people" are surprisingly mundane.

Yep -- it's all show biz. It's important to realize that it is a

_business_ and they're just trying to make money (unlike those of us in
the engineering community who are doing this just 'cuz we love it and
are being supported by our spouses).

Hey, Alice, if you read this, stop by and we'll have us a couple of beers!

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Brad Albing
<itza.secret@none-of.yer-bidness> wrote (in
<42766776@news.cle.ms.philips.com&gt about 'OT: Papal definitions?', on
Mon, 2 May 2005:

unlike those of us in the engineering community who are doing this just
'cuz we love it and are being supported by our spouses).

Or, for some of us who don't have a spouse, our SPICE.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Keith Williams]

In article <42766776@news.cle.ms.philips.com>, itza.secret@none-of.yer-
bidness says...

Rich Grise wrote:

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:58:52 -0400, Glenn Ashmore wrote:

Underneath the make-up, most of "those people" are surprisingly mundane.

Yep -- it's all show biz. It's important to realize that it is a
_business_ and they're just trying to make money (unlike those of us in
the engineering community who are doing this just 'cuz we love it and
are being supported by our spouses).

I guess things are different on that end of the continent.

Hey, Alice, if you read this, stop by and we'll have us a couple of beers!

That sounds like a winner.

--
Keith

 

[Keith Williams]

In article <hNUMrxbrjndCFwOa@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...

I read in sci.electronics.design that Brad Albing
itza.secret@none-of.yer-bidness> wrote (in
42766776@news.cle.ms.philips.com&gt about 'OT: Papal definitions?', on
Mon, 2 May 2005:
unlike those of us in the engineering community who are doing this just
'cuz we love it and are being supported by our spouses).

Or, for some of us who don't have a spouse, our SPICE.

Isn't that bigamy?

--
Keith

 

[Spehro Pefhany]

On Mon, 2 May 2005 20:00:59 +0100, the renowned John Woodgate
<jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Brad Albing
itza.secret@none-of.yer-bidness> wrote (in
42766776@news.cle.ms.philips.com&gt about 'OT: Papal definitions?', on
Mon, 2 May 2005:
unlike those of us in the engineering community who are doing this just
'cuz we love it and are being supported by our spouses).

Or, for some of us who don't have a spouse, our SPICE.

Would that be "don't have a spouse" or "don't have *a* spouse"?


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Keith Williams <krw@att.bizzzz>
wrote (in <MPG.1ce04583c73465a8989a1e@news.individual.net&gt about 'OT:
Papal definitions?', on Mon, 2 May 2005:

In article <hNUMrxbrjndCFwOa@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Brad Albing
itza.secret@none-of.yer-bidness> wrote (in
42766776@news.cle.ms.philips.com&gt about 'OT: Papal definitions?', on
Mon, 2 May 2005:
unlike those of us in the engineering community who are doing this just
'cuz we love it and are being supported by our spouses).

Or, for some of us who don't have a spouse, our SPICE.

Isn't that bigamy?

Not for females; that's bigandry.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Keith Williams]

In article <2sqZDmhRRodCFw$C@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...

I read in sci.electronics.design that Keith Williams <krw@att.bizzzz
wrote (in <MPG.1ce04583c73465a8989a1e@news.individual.net&gt about 'OT:
Papal definitions?', on Mon, 2 May 2005:
In article <hNUMrxbrjndCFwOa@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Brad Albing
itza.secret@none-of.yer-bidness> wrote (in
42766776@news.cle.ms.philips.com&gt about 'OT: Papal definitions?', on
Mon, 2 May 2005:
unlike those of us in the engineering community who are doing this just
'cuz we love it and are being supported by our spouses).

Or, for some of us who don't have a spouse, our SPICE.

Isn't that bigamy?


Not for females; that's bigandry.

Hmm, I didn't know you were female. ;-)

Bigandry doesn't show up in my dictionary.

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=bigamy&x=0&y=0
Main Entry: bigˇaˇmy
Pronunciation: 'bi-g&-mE
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English bigamie, from Medieval Latin bigamia,
from Latin bi- + Late Latin -gamia -gamy
: the act of entering into a marriage with one person while
still legally married to another

I don't see male in there. <shrug>

--
Keith

 

[Bob Stephens]

On Mon, 2 May 2005 15:11:49 -0400, Keith Williams wrote:

In article <hNUMrxbrjndCFwOa@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Brad Albing
itza.secret@none-of.yer-bidness> wrote (in
42766776@news.cle.ms.philips.com&gt about 'OT: Papal definitions?', on
Mon, 2 May 2005:
unlike those of us in the engineering community who are doing this just
'cuz we love it and are being supported by our spouses).

Or, for some of us who don't have a spouse, our SPICE.

Isn't that bigamy?

I told my wife that she was free to bring any of her girl friends into our
bed. I thought that was bigamy


Bob

 

[Spehro Pefhany]

On Mon, 2 May 2005 16:12:41 -0400, the renowned Keith Williams
<krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:

In article <2sqZDmhRRodCFw$C@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Keith Williams <krw@att.bizzzz
wrote (in <MPG.1ce04583c73465a8989a1e@news.individual.net&gt about 'OT:
Papal definitions?', on Mon, 2 May 2005:
In article <hNUMrxbrjndCFwOa@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Brad Albing
itza.secret@none-of.yer-bidness> wrote (in
42766776@news.cle.ms.philips.com&gt about 'OT: Papal definitions?', on
Mon, 2 May 2005:
unlike those of us in the engineering community who are doing this just
'cuz we love it and are being supported by our spouses).

Or, for some of us who don't have a spouse, our SPICE.

Isn't that bigamy?


Not for females; that's bigandry.

Hmm, I didn't know you were female. ;-)

Bigandry doesn't show up in my dictionary.

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=bigamy&x=0&y=0
Main Entry: bigˇaˇmy
Pronunciation: 'bi-g&-mE
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English bigamie, from Medieval Latin bigamia,
from Latin bi- + Late Latin -gamia -gamy
: the act of entering into a marriage with one person while
still legally married to another

I don't see male in there. <shrug

http://www.bartleby.com/61/6/M0380600.html


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Keith Williams <krw@att.bizzzz>
wrote (in <MPG.1ce053a12810e830989a1f@news.individual.net&gt about 'OT:
Papal definitions?', on Mon, 2 May 2005:

Bigandry doesn't show up in my dictionary.

Indeed. It's curious that the epicene word 'bigamy' is common, but the
gender-specific 'bigandry' and 'bigyny' are not.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Bob Stephens <roberts@dcxchol.com>
wrote (in <10s8n86g6j6e4.ny9idx2m3p8a.dlg@40tude.net&gt about 'OT: Papal
definitions?', on Mon, 2 May 2005:

I told my wife that she was free to bring any of her girl friends into
our bed. I thought that was bigamy

No, that was attempted suicide.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

 

[Rich Grise]

On Mon, 02 May 2005 16:25:50 -0400, Spehro Pefhany wrote:

On Mon, 2 May 2005 16:12:41 -0400, the renowned Keith Williams
krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:

In article <2sqZDmhRRodCFw$C@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Keith Williams <krw@att.bizzzz
wrote (in <MPG.1ce04583c73465a8989a1e@news.individual.net&gt about 'OT:
Papal definitions?', on Mon, 2 May 2005:
In article <hNUMrxbrjndCFwOa@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Brad Albing
itza.secret@none-of.yer-bidness> wrote (in
42766776@news.cle.ms.philips.com&gt about 'OT: Papal definitions?', on
Mon, 2 May 2005:
unlike those of us in the engineering community who are doing this just
'cuz we love it and are being supported by our spouses).

Or, for some of us who don't have a spouse, our SPICE.

Isn't that bigamy?


Not for females; that's bigandry.

Hmm, I didn't know you were female. ;-)

Bigandry doesn't show up in my dictionary.

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=bigamy&x=0&y=0
Main Entry: bigˇaˇmy
Pronunciation: 'bi-g&-mE
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English bigamie, from Medieval Latin bigamia,
from Latin bi- + Late Latin -gamia -gamy
: the act of entering into a marriage with one person while
still legally married to another

I don't see male in there. <shrug

http://www.bartleby.com/61/6/M0380600.html

Apparently they skip right from that to polyandry.

Cheers!
Rich

 

[keith]

On Mon, 02 May 2005 13:24:19 -0700, Bob Stephens wrote:

On Mon, 2 May 2005 15:11:49 -0400, Keith Williams wrote:

In article <hNUMrxbrjndCFwOa@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk says...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Brad Albing
itza.secret@none-of.yer-bidness> wrote (in
42766776@news.cle.ms.philips.com&gt about 'OT: Papal definitions?', on
Mon, 2 May 2005:
unlike those of us in the engineering community who are doing this just
'cuz we love it and are being supported by our spouses).

Or, for some of us who don't have a spouse, our SPICE.

Isn't that bigamy?

I told my wife that she was free to bring any of her girl friends into our
bed. I thought that was bigamy

No, that would be bobbittamy.

--
Keith

 

[Brad Albing]

Rich Grise wrote:

Apparently they skip right from that to polyandry.

She was married to Tom Landry, wasn't she?

 

[Brad Albing]

tlbs wrote:

I have eaten at Alice Cooper's restaurant. He serves some decent BBQ
in a family atmosphere. The decorum, of course, is similar to any Hard
Rock Cafe, except the theme is Alice Cooper. I like that there are 3
different styles of BBQ sauce at each table (Kansa City (tomato), Texas
(spicy), and North Carolina (mustard)).

Given that he hasn't made any music since the late 70's?? early 80's??,
I wonder why the pope would bother to mention him at all.


And more importantly, which kind of BBQ does the _Pope_ eat? And does

he have BBQ on Friday?

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Brad Albing
<itza.secret@none-of.yer-bidness> wrote (in
<42778c0e$1@news.cle.ms.philips.com&gt about 'OT: Papal definitions?', on
Tue, 3 May 2005:

And more importantly, which kind of BBQ does the _Pope_ eat?

Burgers St. Lawrence? (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
There are two sides to every question, except
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk