R
Roger Gt
Guest
X-No-Archive: yes
"Rich Grise" wrote
: "Sergey Kubushin" wrote
: > Rich Grise wrote
: > > off; at least I haven't heard of them much lately. I worked
with
: > > a 186 once, and it took ordinary 8086 code. Since Linux is
written
: > > in C, I can't think of a reason why it couldn't be done,
although
: > > preemptive multi-tasking might be a little hairy. =:-O
: >
: > It lacks MMU. But there is a Linux flavor for MMU-less CPUs
out there )
: > Its called ucLinux.
:
: What's "MMU," and how would that impact running Linux?
"Memory Management Unit" without which the address range is
severely limited and multiple users / threads must manage their
own data address space (among other things.)
"Rich Grise" wrote
: "Sergey Kubushin" wrote
: > Rich Grise wrote
: > > off; at least I haven't heard of them much lately. I worked
with
: > > a 186 once, and it took ordinary 8086 code. Since Linux is
written
: > > in C, I can't think of a reason why it couldn't be done,
although
: > > preemptive multi-tasking might be a little hairy. =:-O
: >
: > It lacks MMU. But there is a Linux flavor for MMU-less CPUs
out there )
: > Its called ucLinux.
:
: What's "MMU," and how would that impact running Linux?
"Memory Management Unit" without which the address range is
severely limited and multiple users / threads must manage their
own data address space (among other things.)