Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
curd@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:
but there is plenty of money in CO2, and Germanys C02 per kwh is about 10x that of France
It\'s good for the plants, though. That\'s why despite massive
deforestation in many parts of the world, the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere has remained stable at just under 400ppm for over a hundred
years.
You are an imbecile.
That\'s the standard argument of people who can\'t think about or
discuss things thoughtfully. Crude insults.
That was not an insult. It is impossible to insult this idiot.
He has been told many times on other groups about the flakiness of the
\"data\" he refers to. I can\'t be bothered to repeat it here.
The term \"imbecile\" when referring to doom is perfectly rational.
No coincidence: the coarse insulters can\'t design electronics.
No coincidence.
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
curd@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:
but there is plenty of money in CO2, and Germanys C02 per kwh is about 10x that of France
It\'s good for the plants, though. That\'s why despite massive
deforestation in many parts of the world, the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere has remained stable at just under 400ppm for over a hundred
years.
You are an imbecile.
That\'s the standard argument of people who can\'t think about or
discuss things thoughtfully. Crude insults.
That was not an insult. It is impossible to insult this idiot.
He has been told many times on other groups about the flakiness of the
\"data\" he refers to. I can\'t be bothered to repeat it here.
The term \"imbecile\" when referring to doom is perfectly rational.
No coincidence: the coarse insulters can\'t design electronics.
No coincidence.
This OT thread has nothing to do with electronic design.
You are an imbecile.
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:08:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
curd@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:
but there is plenty of money in CO2, and Germanys C02 per kwh is about 10x that of France
It\'s good for the plants, though. That\'s why despite massive
deforestation in many parts of the world, the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere has remained stable at just under 400ppm for over a hundred
years.
You are an imbecile.
That\'s the standard argument of people who can\'t think about or
discuss things thoughtfully. Crude insults.
That was not an insult. It is impossible to insult this idiot.
He has been told many times on other groups about the flakiness of the
\"data\" he refers to. I can\'t be bothered to repeat it here.
The term \"imbecile\" when referring to doom is perfectly rational.
No coincidence: the coarse insulters can\'t design electronics.
No coincidence.
This OT thread has nothing to do with electronic design.
You are an imbecile.
The crude insulters who can\'t design electronics usually hide their
names too.
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:02:01 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:08:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
curd@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:
but there is plenty of money in CO2, and Germanys C02 per kwh is about 10x that of France
It\'s good for the plants, though. That\'s why despite massive
deforestation in many parts of the world, the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere has remained stable at just under 400ppm for over a hundred
years.
You are an imbecile.
That\'s the standard argument of people who can\'t think about or
discuss things thoughtfully. Crude insults.
That was not an insult. It is impossible to insult this idiot.
He has been told many times on other groups about the flakiness of the
\"data\" he refers to. I can\'t be bothered to repeat it here.
The term \"imbecile\" when referring to doom is perfectly rational.
No coincidence: the coarse insulters can\'t design electronics.
No coincidence.
This OT thread has nothing to do with electronic design.
You are an imbecile.
The crude insulters who can\'t design electronics usually hide their
names too.
You automatically assume that anyone who disagrees with your twisted
views \"can\'t design electronics\".
Typical of an arrogant narcissist git.
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:36:25 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:02:01 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:08:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
curd@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:
but there is plenty of money in CO2, and Germanys C02 per kwh is about 10x that of France
It\'s good for the plants, though. That\'s why despite massive
deforestation in many parts of the world, the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere has remained stable at just under 400ppm for over a hundred
years.
You are an imbecile.
That\'s the standard argument of people who can\'t think about or
discuss things thoughtfully. Crude insults.
That was not an insult. It is impossible to insult this idiot.
He has been told many times on other groups about the flakiness of the
\"data\" he refers to. I can\'t be bothered to repeat it here.
The term \"imbecile\" when referring to doom is perfectly rational.
No coincidence: the coarse insulters can\'t design electronics.
No coincidence.
This OT thread has nothing to do with electronic design.
You are an imbecile.
The crude insulters who can\'t design electronics usually hide their
names too.
You automatically assume that anyone who disagrees with your twisted
views \"can\'t design electronics\".
Typical of an arrogant narcissist git.
What difference would that make, if indeed true
This ain\'t Facebook
or Twitter, it\'s an electronic design forum.
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:55:21 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:36:25 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:02:01 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:08:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
curd@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:
but there is plenty of money in CO2, and Germanys C02 per kwh is about 10x that of France
It\'s good for the plants, though. That\'s why despite massive
deforestation in many parts of the world, the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere has remained stable at just under 400ppm for over a hundred
years.
You are an imbecile.
That\'s the standard argument of people who can\'t think about or
discuss things thoughtfully. Crude insults.
That was not an insult. It is impossible to insult this idiot.
He has been told many times on other groups about the flakiness of the
\"data\" he refers to. I can\'t be bothered to repeat it here.
The term \"imbecile\" when referring to doom is perfectly rational.
No coincidence: the coarse insulters can\'t design electronics.
No coincidence.
This OT thread has nothing to do with electronic design.
You are an imbecile.
The crude insulters who can\'t design electronics usually hide their
names too.
You automatically assume that anyone who disagrees with your twisted
views \"can\'t design electronics\".
Typical of an arrogant narcissist git.
What difference would that make, if indeed true
Of course it\'s true. You are obviously arrogant and classically
narcissistic. I pity anybody who has to work for you.
This ain\'t Facebook
or Twitter, it\'s an electronic design forum.
If that was a sincere comment, you wouldn\'t participate in this
off-topic guff.
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 4:28:37 PM UTC-4, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Cursitor Doom <cu...@notformail.com> wrote:
If the Cultural Marxist-Anarchist-BLM-ANTIFA brigade attempt to
interfere with Trump\'s pick of the new judge, THERE WILL BE TROUBLE.
Just sayin\'.
Such a bigottery:
2016: We won\'t confirm until the election.
2020: Of course we confirm before the election.
It\'s actually completely ordinary. Ted Cruz explains:
https://youtu.be/JuZqomU5EHQ
There has been a supreme court vacancy in an election year 29 times.
Presidents have made nominations all 29 times -- that\'s what they do.
If there\'s a vacancy, they nominate a replacement.
Then comes the Senate, the other half of this process. Their actions,
reasonably, depend on whether they\'re the same party as the president,
or different.
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 4:04:51 PM UTC-7, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 19, 2020 at 4:28:37 PM UTC-4, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Cursitor Doom <cu...@notformail.com> wrote:
If the Cultural Marxist-Anarchist-BLM-ANTIFA brigade attempt to
interfere with Trump\'s pick of the new judge, THERE WILL BE TROUBLE.
Just sayin\'.
Such a bigottery:
2016: We won\'t confirm until the election.
2020: Of course we confirm before the election.
It\'s actually completely ordinary. Ted Cruz explains:
https://youtu.be/JuZqomU5EHQ
There has been a supreme court vacancy in an election year 29 times.
Presidents have made nominations all 29 times -- that\'s what they do.
If there\'s a vacancy, they nominate a replacement.
Then comes the Senate, the other half of this process. Their actions,
reasonably, depend on whether they\'re the same party as the president,
or different.
Nonsense. Judicial work is not political (will survive long past any party-in-power and
is dependent on actual legislative results, not the preliminaries and disagreements).
A Supreme Court justice routinely shuns any partisan connection.
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 8:48:08 PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
The appointee is the subject of appointment inquiries, not the president.
It\'s shocking to see an American claim that, and factually false--the
president appoints, the Senate confirms. The Constitution says so
(Article II, Section 2).
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:36:25 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:02:01 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:08:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
cu...@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:
but there is plenty of money in CO2, and Germanys C02 per kwh is about 10x that of France
It\'s good for the plants, though. That\'s why despite massive
deforestation in many parts of the world, the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere has remained stable at just under 400ppm for over a hundred
years.
You are an imbecile.
That\'s the standard argument of people who can\'t think about or
discuss things thoughtfully. Crude insults.
That was not an insult. It is impossible to insult this idiot.
He has been told many times on other groups about the flakiness of the
\"data\" he refers to. I can\'t be bothered to repeat it here.
The term \"imbecile\" when referring to doom is perfectly rational.
No coincidence: the coarse insulters can\'t design electronics.
No coincidence.
This OT thread has nothing to do with electronic design.
You are an imbecile.
The crude insulters who can\'t design electronics usually hide their
names too.
You automatically assume that anyone who disagrees with your twisted
views \"can\'t design electronics\".
Typical of an arrogant narcissist git.
What difference would that make, if indeed true? This ain\'t Facebook
or Twitter, it\'s an electronic design forum.
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 10:24:04 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
...the US justice system stands as an example for the rest of the world, as does our political system. You guys don\'t even have a Bill of Rights like the USA.
The US Constitution, as it left the convention floor, also didn\'t have that Bill of Rights.
Those ten amendments were patches, submitted alongside conditional
ratifications from various states.
The Bill of Rights, as a proper subset within the US Constitution, was an afterthought.
Other constitutions didn\'t need separate afterthoughts, to bestow rights.
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 11:08:19 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 10:24:04 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
...the US justice system stands as an example for the rest of the world, as does our political system. You guys don\'t even have a Bill of Rights like the USA.
The US Constitution, as it left the convention floor, also didn\'t have that Bill of Rights.
Those ten amendments were patches, submitted alongside conditional
ratifications from various states.
The Bill of Rights, as a proper subset within the US Constitution, was an afterthought.
Other constitutions didn\'t need separate afterthoughts, to bestow rights.
The Bill of Rights is what separates the USA from virtually every other country in the world. It guarantees basic human rights to EVERY citizen which the government CAN\'T take away. It is a MODEL for political science, but no other country has an equivalent to it because they don\'t WANT their citizens to have rights - it\'s TOO DAMN INCONVENIENT!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights
If the Cultural Marxist-Anarchist-BLM-ANTIFA brigade attempt to
interfere with Trump\'s pick of the new judge, THERE WILL BE TROUBLE.
Just sayin\'.
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 6:12:03 PM UTC-7, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 8:48:08 PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
The appointee is the subject of appointment inquiries, not the president.
It\'s shocking to see an American claim that, and factually false--the
president appoints, the Senate confirms. The Constitution says so
(Article II, Section 2).
Huh?
The Senate first inquires into the appointee, and can confirm or deny.
Why is it shocking that such an inquiry is about the appointee?
Surely that\'s common knowledge.
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 10:33:13 PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 6:12:03 PM UTC-7, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 8:48:08 PM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
The appointee is the subject of appointment inquiries, not the president.
It\'s shocking to see an American claim that, and factually false--the
president appoints, the Senate confirms. The Constitution says so
(Article II, Section 2).
Huh?
The Senate first inquires into the appointee, and can confirm or deny.
Why is it shocking that such an inquiry is about the appointee?
Surely that\'s common knowledge.
I understood \"appointment inquiries\" to mean you thought the Senate was
responsible for \'inquiries\' to identify potential candidates suitable for
appointment.
Of course they don\'t--the president nominates, the Dems crucify, character
assassinate (since Biden borked Bork), the Senate confirms, etc.
Cheers,
James Arthur
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:58:22 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:55:21 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:36:25 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:02:01 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:08:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
curd@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:
but there is plenty of money in CO2, and Germanys C02 per kwh is about 10x that of France
It\'s good for the plants, though. That\'s why despite massive
deforestation in many parts of the world, the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere has remained stable at just under 400ppm for over a hundred
years.
You are an imbecile.
That\'s the standard argument of people who can\'t think about or
discuss things thoughtfully. Crude insults.
That was not an insult. It is impossible to insult this idiot.
He has been told many times on other groups about the flakiness of the
\"data\" he refers to. I can\'t be bothered to repeat it here.
The term \"imbecile\" when referring to doom is perfectly rational.
No coincidence: the coarse insulters can\'t design electronics.
No coincidence.
This OT thread has nothing to do with electronic design.
You are an imbecile.
The crude insulters who can\'t design electronics usually hide their
names too.
You automatically assume that anyone who disagrees with your twisted
views \"can\'t design electronics\".
Typical of an arrogant narcissist git.
What difference would that make, if indeed true
Of course it\'s true. You are obviously arrogant and classically
narcissistic. I pity anybody who has to work for you.
They seem pretty happy. The pay and bonuses and medical coverage and
company-funded 401K and free chocolate don\'t hurt, and we occasionally
post bail for spouses. Everyone has been on full salary and benefits
through the covid things, whether we had work for them or not.
We have a lot of fun, actually.
This ain\'t Facebook
or Twitter, it\'s an electronic design forum.
If that was a sincere comment, you wouldn\'t participate in this
off-topic guff.
OK, I will ignore you. All you do is cackle anyhow.
Thank goodness for that. I can\'t say I\'ll miss you.
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 10:24:04 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
...the US justice system stands as an example for the rest of the world, as does our political system. You guys don\'t even have a Bill of Rights like the USA.
The US Constitution, as it left the convention floor, also didn\'t have that Bill of Rights.
Those ten amendments were patches, submitted alongside conditional
ratifications from various states.
The Bill of Rights, as a proper subset within the US Constitution, was an afterthought.
Other constitutions didn\'t need separate afterthoughts, to bestow rights.
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:53:37 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:58:22 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:55:21 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:36:25 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:02:01 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:08:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyb@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pommyB@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
curd@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:
but there is plenty of money in CO2, and Germanys C02 per kwh is about 10x that of France
It\'s good for the plants, though. That\'s why despite massive
deforestation in many parts of the world, the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere has remained stable at just under 400ppm for over a hundred
years.
You are an imbecile.
That\'s the standard argument of people who can\'t think about or
discuss things thoughtfully. Crude insults.
That was not an insult. It is impossible to insult this idiot.
He has been told many times on other groups about the flakiness of the
\"data\" he refers to. I can\'t be bothered to repeat it here.
The term \"imbecile\" when referring to doom is perfectly rational.
No coincidence: the coarse insulters can\'t design electronics.
No coincidence.
This OT thread has nothing to do with electronic design.
You are an imbecile.
The crude insulters who can\'t design electronics usually hide their
names too.
You automatically assume that anyone who disagrees with your twisted
views \"can\'t design electronics\".
Typical of an arrogant narcissist git.
What difference would that make, if indeed true
Of course it\'s true. You are obviously arrogant and classically
narcissistic. I pity anybody who has to work for you.
They seem pretty happy. The pay and bonuses and medical coverage and
company-funded 401K and free chocolate don\'t hurt, and we occasionally
post bail for spouses. Everyone has been on full salary and benefits
through the covid things, whether we had work for them or not.
We have a lot of fun, actually.
This ain\'t Facebook
or Twitter, it\'s an electronic design forum.
If that was a sincere comment, you wouldn\'t participate in this
off-topic guff.
OK, I will ignore you. All you do is cackle anyhow.
Thank goodness for that. I can\'t say I\'ll miss you.
Now fuck off.
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 19:12:42 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:53:37 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:58:22 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:55:21 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:36:25 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:02:01 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:08:51 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:40:24 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:28:46 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:02:11 -0700, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:56:06 +0100, Pomegranate Bastard
pom...@aol.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 17:32:28 +0100, Cursitor Doom
cu...@notformail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:
OK, I will ignore you. All you do is cackle anyhow.
Thank goodness for that. I can\'t say I\'ll miss you.
Now fuck off.
John has over the last 25 years or so been one of the most valued
contributors here so WTH are you, an obvious TROLL, to tell him or
anyone else here to fuck off?
You called me an imbecile for my remarks about the level of CO2 in the
atmosphere. I went to a massive amount of trouble and expense to
acquire reputable, accredited sources of information in physical print
form going right back to the closing years of the 19th C. in an effort
to establish whether the persistent whinings of climate alarmists like
Greta Thunberg and Al Gore were in any way justified. They were not.
Not even remotely. The level of atmospheric CO2 has remained largely
constant at ~380ppm since 1898, despite that 122 year period seeing
the advent of the motor car and the huge growth of carbon-intensive
mass manufacturing the world has ever seen.
I\'m not pointing this out
for YOUR benefit because YOU are a troll and *no amount of evidence*
will ever disabuse you of your ignorance, but there will be others
with open minds reading this who will derive some benefit from it and
perhaps even pursue their own studies of the matter to eliminate any
doubt whatsoever in their minds as to who is the real imbecile here.
Oh, and one more thing: <*PLONK*
Time wasting trolls are not welcome here.