OT Kyle Rittenhouse found NOT GUILTY!...

[Phil Allison]

Know Nothing Lying Fuckhead bill....@ieee.org wrote:
============================================

** Die a slow an painful death, you vile prick

Wandering around carrying a rifle in the middle of a riot is much more provocative,
** Of what exactly ?
Getting criminal rioters to to behave ?

How would you expect them to behave?
** ROTFL wot a hoot !
Rittenhouse shouldn\'t have done it.

** Bullshit. He had every right to and it was a honorable thing.

It might have been \"honorable\" from his half-witted point of view, but it was never going to do anything remotely useful, and it was not a good idea.

** It was just that - fuckhead

I had put back the words you snipped, without marking the snip, so your grasp of what might be \"honourable\" does seem to be defective. You\'d have to be brain-damaged to imagine that it wouldn\'t be noticed.

snipped the rest - Phil doesn\'t really understand how much of an idiot he can be

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Phil Allison]

Know Nothing Lying Fuckhead bill....@ieee.org wrote:
============================================

** Die a slow an painful death, you vile prick

Wandering around carrying a rifle in the middle of a riot is much more provocative,
** Of what exactly ?
Getting criminal rioters to to behave ?

How would you expect them to behave?
** ROTFL wot a hoot !
Rittenhouse shouldn\'t have done it.

** Bullshit. He had every right to and it was a honorable thing.

It might have been \"honorable\" from his half-witted point of view, but it was never going to do anything remotely useful, and it was not a good idea.

** It was just that - fuckhead

I had put back the words you snipped, without marking the snip, so your grasp of what might be \"honourable\" does seem to be defective. You\'d have to be brain-damaged to imagine that it wouldn\'t be noticed.

snipped the rest - Phil doesn\'t really understand how much of an idiot he can be

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 6:14:21 PM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
> bill....@ieee.org wrote:

<snip>

Rittenhouse wouldn\'t have bothered wandering around in the middle of riot carrying a rifle if he didn\'t expect to provoke a reaction
** Yes - it provokes less rioting.

Armed police use the same idea over and over.

There are lot more armed police around when they try it, and they have a habit of arresting anybody who catches their attention, and taking them away - not an option open to Rittenhouse.

** More false analogies.

I didn\'t make any kind of analogy. Your equation of a single kid with a rifle with a bunch of armed police isn\'t exactly an analogy either - it\'s more of a false equation.

** Irrelevant, Kyle and others there just wanted to keep the rabid idiots at bay.
Perfectly legal and sensible.

So a rabble of armed rabid idiots is going to keep other rabid idiots at bay? A well regulated militia (or a police force) has been trained in how to behave in those kinds of situations, and they aren\'t all that effective, even then. A bunch of Kylie Rittenhouse look-alikes is just a disaster waiting to happen, as it did.

> Even the POLICE supported him.

Not a claim I\'ve heard before. Maybe you mean that they didn\'t bother to arrest him.

You really don\'t know what you are talking about.

** The opposite is true.

Phil is now omniscient, or at least he thinks he is. The helpful people with the long-sleeved shirt can\'t be all that far away now.

<snip>

--

Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 6:14:21 PM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
> bill....@ieee.org wrote:

<snip>

Rittenhouse wouldn\'t have bothered wandering around in the middle of riot carrying a rifle if he didn\'t expect to provoke a reaction
** Yes - it provokes less rioting.

Armed police use the same idea over and over.

There are lot more armed police around when they try it, and they have a habit of arresting anybody who catches their attention, and taking them away - not an option open to Rittenhouse.

** More false analogies.

I didn\'t make any kind of analogy. Your equation of a single kid with a rifle with a bunch of armed police isn\'t exactly an analogy either - it\'s more of a false equation.

** Irrelevant, Kyle and others there just wanted to keep the rabid idiots at bay.
Perfectly legal and sensible.

So a rabble of armed rabid idiots is going to keep other rabid idiots at bay? A well regulated militia (or a police force) has been trained in how to behave in those kinds of situations, and they aren\'t all that effective, even then. A bunch of Kylie Rittenhouse look-alikes is just a disaster waiting to happen, as it did.

> Even the POLICE supported him.

Not a claim I\'ve heard before. Maybe you mean that they didn\'t bother to arrest him.

You really don\'t know what you are talking about.

** The opposite is true.

Phil is now omniscient, or at least he thinks he is. The helpful people with the long-sleeved shirt can\'t be all that far away now.

<snip>

--

Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 6:14:21 PM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
> bill....@ieee.org wrote:

<snip>

Rittenhouse wouldn\'t have bothered wandering around in the middle of riot carrying a rifle if he didn\'t expect to provoke a reaction
** Yes - it provokes less rioting.

Armed police use the same idea over and over.

There are lot more armed police around when they try it, and they have a habit of arresting anybody who catches their attention, and taking them away - not an option open to Rittenhouse.

** More false analogies.

I didn\'t make any kind of analogy. Your equation of a single kid with a rifle with a bunch of armed police isn\'t exactly an analogy either - it\'s more of a false equation.

** Irrelevant, Kyle and others there just wanted to keep the rabid idiots at bay.
Perfectly legal and sensible.

So a rabble of armed rabid idiots is going to keep other rabid idiots at bay? A well regulated militia (or a police force) has been trained in how to behave in those kinds of situations, and they aren\'t all that effective, even then. A bunch of Kylie Rittenhouse look-alikes is just a disaster waiting to happen, as it did.

> Even the POLICE supported him.

Not a claim I\'ve heard before. Maybe you mean that they didn\'t bother to arrest him.

You really don\'t know what you are talking about.

** The opposite is true.

Phil is now omniscient, or at least he thinks he is. The helpful people with the long-sleeved shirt can\'t be all that far away now.

<snip>

--

Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 6:14:21 PM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
> bill....@ieee.org wrote:

<snip>

Rittenhouse wouldn\'t have bothered wandering around in the middle of riot carrying a rifle if he didn\'t expect to provoke a reaction
** Yes - it provokes less rioting.

Armed police use the same idea over and over.

There are lot more armed police around when they try it, and they have a habit of arresting anybody who catches their attention, and taking them away - not an option open to Rittenhouse.

** More false analogies.

I didn\'t make any kind of analogy. Your equation of a single kid with a rifle with a bunch of armed police isn\'t exactly an analogy either - it\'s more of a false equation.

** Irrelevant, Kyle and others there just wanted to keep the rabid idiots at bay.
Perfectly legal and sensible.

So a rabble of armed rabid idiots is going to keep other rabid idiots at bay? A well regulated militia (or a police force) has been trained in how to behave in those kinds of situations, and they aren\'t all that effective, even then. A bunch of Kylie Rittenhouse look-alikes is just a disaster waiting to happen, as it did.

> Even the POLICE supported him.

Not a claim I\'ve heard before. Maybe you mean that they didn\'t bother to arrest him.

You really don\'t know what you are talking about.

** The opposite is true.

Phil is now omniscient, or at least he thinks he is. The helpful people with the long-sleeved shirt can\'t be all that far away now.

<snip>

--

Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Phil Allison]

Some Raving Vile Lunatic called bill....@ieee.org wrote:
============================================

This vile asshole is actually an *officer bearer* for the NSW branch of the IEEE.

What a FUCKING EMBARRASSMENT !!
=================================

Rittenhouse wouldn\'t have bothered wandering around in the middle of riot carrying a rifle if he didn\'t expect to provoke a reaction
** Yes - it provokes less rioting.

Armed police use the same idea over and over.

There are lot more armed police around when they try it, and they have a habit of arresting anybody who catches their attention, and taking them away - not an option open to Rittenhouse.

** More false analogies.

I didn\'t make any kind of analogy.

** Of course you did - you lying asshole

** Irrelevant, Kyle and others there just wanted to keep the rabid idiots at bay.
Perfectly legal and sensible.

So a rabble of armed rabid idiots is going to keep other rabid idiots at bay?

** Straw man fallacy. Plus total fucking bullshit.

Even the POLICE supported him.
Not a claim I\'ve heard before.

** Your problem - fuckhead.

Cos you are a vile, fucking, stupid ostrich with you head up you arse.


> Phil is now omniscient,

** Compared to a VILE, willfully pig ignorant, autistic, demented POS fucking asshole

I most certainly am.



..... rgds, Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

Some Raving Vile Lunatic called bill....@ieee.org wrote:
============================================

This vile asshole is actually an *officer bearer* for the NSW branch of the IEEE.

What a FUCKING EMBARRASSMENT !!
=================================

Rittenhouse wouldn\'t have bothered wandering around in the middle of riot carrying a rifle if he didn\'t expect to provoke a reaction
** Yes - it provokes less rioting.

Armed police use the same idea over and over.

There are lot more armed police around when they try it, and they have a habit of arresting anybody who catches their attention, and taking them away - not an option open to Rittenhouse.

** More false analogies.

I didn\'t make any kind of analogy.

** Of course you did - you lying asshole

** Irrelevant, Kyle and others there just wanted to keep the rabid idiots at bay.
Perfectly legal and sensible.

So a rabble of armed rabid idiots is going to keep other rabid idiots at bay?

** Straw man fallacy. Plus total fucking bullshit.

Even the POLICE supported him.
Not a claim I\'ve heard before.

** Your problem - fuckhead.

Cos you are a vile, fucking, stupid ostrich with you head up you arse.


> Phil is now omniscient,

** Compared to a VILE, willfully pig ignorant, autistic, demented POS fucking asshole

I most certainly am.



..... rgds, Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

Some Raving Vile Lunatic called bill....@ieee.org wrote:
============================================

This vile asshole is actually an *officer bearer* for the NSW branch of the IEEE.

What a FUCKING EMBARRASSMENT !!
=================================

Rittenhouse wouldn\'t have bothered wandering around in the middle of riot carrying a rifle if he didn\'t expect to provoke a reaction
** Yes - it provokes less rioting.

Armed police use the same idea over and over.

There are lot more armed police around when they try it, and they have a habit of arresting anybody who catches their attention, and taking them away - not an option open to Rittenhouse.

** More false analogies.

I didn\'t make any kind of analogy.

** Of course you did - you lying asshole

** Irrelevant, Kyle and others there just wanted to keep the rabid idiots at bay.
Perfectly legal and sensible.

So a rabble of armed rabid idiots is going to keep other rabid idiots at bay?

** Straw man fallacy. Plus total fucking bullshit.

Even the POLICE supported him.
Not a claim I\'ve heard before.

** Your problem - fuckhead.

Cos you are a vile, fucking, stupid ostrich with you head up you arse.


> Phil is now omniscient,

** Compared to a VILE, willfully pig ignorant, autistic, demented POS fucking asshole

I most certainly am.



..... rgds, Phil

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 9:03:34 PM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:

Some Raving Vile Lunatic called bill....@ieee.org wrote:
============================================

This vile asshole is actually an *officer bearer* for the NSW branch of the IEEE.

What a FUCKING EMBARRASSMENT !!

Not half as much as Phil would be ...

Rittenhouse wouldn\'t have bothered wandering around in the middle of riot carrying a rifle if he didn\'t expect to provoke a reaction.

** Yes - it provokes less rioting.

Armed police use the same idea over and over.

There are lot more armed police around when they try it, and they have a habit of arresting anybody who catches their attention, and taking them away - not an option open to Rittenhouse.

** More false analogies.

I didn\'t make any kind of analogy.

** Of course you did - you lying asshole.

You think I did, which is a long way from the same thing.

** Irrelevant, Kyle and others there just wanted to keep the rabid idiots at bay.
Perfectly legal and sensible.

So a rabble of armed rabid idiots is going to keep other rabid idiots at bay?

** Straw man fallacy. Plus total fucking bullshit.

Not that Phil knows what a strawman fallacy is. And while he produces a lot of bullshit, he fails to recognise it in his own output, so his judgement is suspect..

Even the POLICE supported him.

Not a claim I\'ve heard before.

** Your problem - fuckhead.

Not the correct response - first you tell me who made the claim (probably some half-wit on Fox News or it\'s Australian equivalent, Sky News, which is just as adept at feeding Phil with the nonsense he likes to hear) and only then do you tell me how inferior my information collecting processes are.

> Cos you are a vile, fucking, stupid ostrich with you head up you arse.

Mixing your metaphors there. Ostrichs are claimed to bury their heads in the sand (though they don\'t) rather sticking them up their own arses.

I don\'t think much of your opinions either, but gullible stupidity is a sufficient explanation for the twaddle you post..

Phil is now omniscient,

** Compared to a VILE, willfully pig ignorant, autistic, demented POS fucking asshole

Phil does seem to have described himself in some detail there. I\'m not in the least autistic, and Phil\'s enthusiasm for describing the rest of the world as autistic does suggest that he\'s projecting his own problems onto everybody else.

> I most certainly am.

Phil\'s certainty is misplaced.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[server]

On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:55:29 -0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:e9cac7d7-9610-4441-9b6d-4dbb8b63dfaen@googlegroups.com:

On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 10:56:34 AM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/verdict-kyle-rittenhouse-not-guilty

This was a political persecution from the get-go - the prosecution
presented absolutely NO evidence to support ANY of their charges.
On the contrary, the evidence they did present EXONERATED
Rittenhouse. Kudos to the jury for having the common sense to
acquit Rittenhouse in the face of very intense public pressure to
do the opposite.


A retarded kid with an illegally aquired gun walking down the street
of a town he doesn\'t even live in.

It was murder.

EVERYTHING the dopey putz did from the moment he aquired the gun
illegally was a crime.

He was attacked by career criminals. Thugs and perverts.

https://www.wisconsinrightnow.com/2021/03/12/kenosha-shooting/

The bottom line: Rosenbaum was a registered sex offender who was out
on bond for a domestic abuse battery accusation and was caught on
video acting aggressively earlier that night. Huber was a felon
convicted in a strangulation case who was recently accused of domestic
abuse. Grosskreutz was convicted of a crime for use of a firearm while
intoxicated and was armed with a handgun when shot. You can read their
criminal records in full later in this article.



--

Father Brown\'s figure remained quite dark and still;
but in that instant he had lost his head. His head was
always most valuable when he had lost it.

 

[server]

On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:55:29 -0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:e9cac7d7-9610-4441-9b6d-4dbb8b63dfaen@googlegroups.com:

On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 10:56:34 AM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/verdict-kyle-rittenhouse-not-guilty

This was a political persecution from the get-go - the prosecution
presented absolutely NO evidence to support ANY of their charges.
On the contrary, the evidence they did present EXONERATED
Rittenhouse. Kudos to the jury for having the common sense to
acquit Rittenhouse in the face of very intense public pressure to
do the opposite.


A retarded kid with an illegally aquired gun walking down the street
of a town he doesn\'t even live in.

It was murder.

EVERYTHING the dopey putz did from the moment he aquired the gun
illegally was a crime.

He was attacked by career criminals. Thugs and perverts.

https://www.wisconsinrightnow.com/2021/03/12/kenosha-shooting/

The bottom line: Rosenbaum was a registered sex offender who was out
on bond for a domestic abuse battery accusation and was caught on
video acting aggressively earlier that night. Huber was a felon
convicted in a strangulation case who was recently accused of domestic
abuse. Grosskreutz was convicted of a crime for use of a firearm while
intoxicated and was armed with a handgun when shot. You can read their
criminal records in full later in this article.



--

Father Brown\'s figure remained quite dark and still;
but in that instant he had lost his head. His head was
always most valuable when he had lost it.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Monday, November 22, 2021 at 12:05:44 AM UTC+11, Pamela wrote:

On 02:23 21 Nov 2021, Simon S Aysdie said:
On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 5:28:25 PM UTC-8, Pamela wrote:
On 00:14 21 Nov 2021, said:
Pamela <pamela.priv...@gmail.com> wrote in news:XnsADE8B26...@144.76.35.252:
On 22:55 19 Nov 2021, said: Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:e9cac7d7-9610-4441...@googlegroups.com:
On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 10:56:34 AM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:

<snip>

Basically, the charming Rosenbaum set the whole thing off.

https://meaww.com/will-gaige-grosskreutz-maurice-freeland- and-ziminski-be-charged-after-rittenhouse-verdict

\"Joshua Ziminski ... has already been charged with firing a gun into
the air just before Rittenhouse shot three men.\"

Perhaps Grosskreutz and Maurice Freeland will be indicted. So there are more perps than the three who got shot. Let\'s hope
justice prevails and they all get charged.

Well done, Rittenhouse.

You want to encourage that kind of behavior?

> I love it when the good guys win.

Rittenhouse didn\'t know what he was doing - essentially he was acting out some adolescent fantasy. That doesn\'t make him any kind of \"good guy\" and re-writing the story to make him look like some kind of idealist is downright silly.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[server]

Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:179870c4-205b-4f5e-ab3d-8da05dd7ea21n@googlegroups.com:

. It is riots, including destruction of property, that are not
permitted.

Creating violent militias is also NOT peaceable assembly.

The KKK has been illicit from the start, and so has other gangs.

Inciting such behavior is ALSO \"not permitted\", so Beobert, and MTG,
and Hawley and a host of other oath sworn jackasses need to be \"not
permitted\" to walk on free soil for then next ten years.

It really is that simple. One cannot claim to be part of the good,
and then commit foul acts claiming to have had a right to do so.

There is a reason it is called civil society, and the dopes who spend
their lives convoluting the freedoms of the masses into their own gains
should rightfully lose their freedom for doing it.

 

[server]

Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:179870c4-205b-4f5e-ab3d-8da05dd7ea21n@googlegroups.com:

. It is riots, including destruction of property, that are not
permitted.

Creating violent militias is also NOT peaceable assembly.

The KKK has been illicit from the start, and so has other gangs.

Inciting such behavior is ALSO \"not permitted\", so Beobert, and MTG,
and Hawley and a host of other oath sworn jackasses need to be \"not
permitted\" to walk on free soil for then next ten years.

It really is that simple. One cannot claim to be part of the good,
and then commit foul acts claiming to have had a right to do so.

There is a reason it is called civil society, and the dopes who spend
their lives convoluting the freedoms of the masses into their own gains
should rightfully lose their freedom for doing it.

 

[server]

Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:179870c4-205b-4f5e-ab3d-8da05dd7ea21n@googlegroups.com:

. It is riots, including destruction of property, that are not
permitted.

Creating violent militias is also NOT peaceable assembly.

The KKK has been illicit from the start, and so has other gangs.

Inciting such behavior is ALSO \"not permitted\", so Beobert, and MTG,
and Hawley and a host of other oath sworn jackasses need to be \"not
permitted\" to walk on free soil for then next ten years.

It really is that simple. One cannot claim to be part of the good,
and then commit foul acts claiming to have had a right to do so.

There is a reason it is called civil society, and the dopes who spend
their lives convoluting the freedoms of the masses into their own gains
should rightfully lose their freedom for doing it.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 10:32:19 PM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:55:29 -0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:e9cac7d7-9610-4441...@googlegroups.com:

On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 10:56:34 AM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/verdict-kyle-rittenhouse-not-guilty

This was a political persecution from the get-go - the prosecution
presented absolutely NO evidence to support ANY of their charges.
On the contrary, the evidence they did present EXONERATED
Rittenhouse. Kudos to the jury for having the common sense to
acquit Rittenhouse in the face of very intense public pressure to
do the opposite.

A retarded kid with an illegally aquired gun walking down the street
of a town he doesn\'t even live in.

It was murder.

EVERYTHING the dopey putz did from the moment he acquired the gun
illegally was a crime.

He was attacked by career criminals. Thugs and perverts.

https://www.wisconsinrightnow.com/2021/03/12/kenosha-shooting/

They wouldn\'t have attacked him if he hadn\'t been wandering through the town carrying a rifle.

His bizarre enthusiasm for supporting law and order in a town he didn\'t know did elicit violent reactions, but wandering around alone with a gun in the middle of riot is likely to attract the wrong kind of attention, and it did nothing to cool off the riot.

The bottom line: Rosenbaum was a registered sex offender who was out
on bond for a domestic abuse battery accusation and was caught on
video acting aggressively earlier that night. Huber was a felon
convicted in a strangulation case who was recently accused of domestic
abuse. Grosskreutz was convicted of a crime for use of a firearm while
intoxicated and was armed with a handgun when shot. You can read their
criminal records in full later in this article.

You can, but their character defects shouldn\'t have got them shot. The bottom line is that if Kyle Rittenhouse hadn\'t been wandering around with his rifle, they wouldn\'t have got shot. If Kyle Rittenhouse had been doing anything useful or constructive by his wandering around with his rifle it would be a different story, but he was being stupid, and it got two people killed and third one permanently damaged.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 10:32:19 PM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:55:29 -0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Flyguy <soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:e9cac7d7-9610-4441...@googlegroups.com:

On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 10:56:34 AM UTC-8, Flyguy wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/verdict-kyle-rittenhouse-not-guilty

This was a political persecution from the get-go - the prosecution
presented absolutely NO evidence to support ANY of their charges.
On the contrary, the evidence they did present EXONERATED
Rittenhouse. Kudos to the jury for having the common sense to
acquit Rittenhouse in the face of very intense public pressure to
do the opposite.

A retarded kid with an illegally aquired gun walking down the street
of a town he doesn\'t even live in.

It was murder.

EVERYTHING the dopey putz did from the moment he acquired the gun
illegally was a crime.

He was attacked by career criminals. Thugs and perverts.

https://www.wisconsinrightnow.com/2021/03/12/kenosha-shooting/

They wouldn\'t have attacked him if he hadn\'t been wandering through the town carrying a rifle.

His bizarre enthusiasm for supporting law and order in a town he didn\'t know did elicit violent reactions, but wandering around alone with a gun in the middle of riot is likely to attract the wrong kind of attention, and it did nothing to cool off the riot.

The bottom line: Rosenbaum was a registered sex offender who was out
on bond for a domestic abuse battery accusation and was caught on
video acting aggressively earlier that night. Huber was a felon
convicted in a strangulation case who was recently accused of domestic
abuse. Grosskreutz was convicted of a crime for use of a firearm while
intoxicated and was armed with a handgun when shot. You can read their
criminal records in full later in this article.

You can, but their character defects shouldn\'t have got them shot. The bottom line is that if Kyle Rittenhouse hadn\'t been wandering around with his rifle, they wouldn\'t have got shot. If Kyle Rittenhouse had been doing anything useful or constructive by his wandering around with his rifle it would be a different story, but he was being stupid, and it got two people killed and third one permanently damaged.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[server]

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote in news:7861db81-5f57-4991-
b039-664a2d3d3dean@googlegroups.com:

He didn\'t end up defending any property at all,

** He certainly did.

You are the same kind of dumbfuck who would defend a cop planting
evidence or setting up a speed trap and then claiming to do one\'s job
as the reason for ignoring the ethics of the act (and criminality in
the first instance).

You can\'t go to a bar looking for a fight, then rile someone up and
provake a response so you can then attack him and or do great harm to
him claiming you were defending yourself.

What that is... is premeditated felony assault.

In a law circles, I believe it is referred to as \"entrapment\" when
someone or a cop sets you up like that.

The immature little putz, Kyle Rittenhouse should never have been
allowed to own a gun at all. Just like alcohol and driving
privileges, we do not allow either until a certain age has been
exceeded. It should really be \"after a certain aptitude level has
been achieved\".
Yet one\'s parent can allow one to smoke cigarettes and drink in thier
presence before the age. In farmlands even drive essential equipment
unlicensed. A gun should be the same way. Keep them from kids until
an established maturity level and age has been achieved. PERIOD. 17
ain\'t it.

This nation\'s educational system decline is largely the fault of
the white supremacist republicans over the last 60 years. Dumb dads
make bad gun owners and their even dumber dumb younguns even worse,
and we are now three generations into a nation with poorly raised
idiots raising their idiots even more poorly then they were raised.
Much less having any gun knowledge.


RittenTard:

Illegal gun Strike one

Load up with FMJ Strike two

Go out and aggressively confront other US citizens with a deadly
weapon over your shoulder Strike three

Utilize said deadly weapon to kill three other US citizens. That
is murder.

This punk motherfucker should never have had a gun to begin with,
and certainly should never be allowed to have one in the future.
When the cops showed up they should have \"taken him out\" in the
interest of public safety if the fucktard was still sporting the
weapon when they got there.

 

[server]

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote in news:7861db81-5f57-4991-
b039-664a2d3d3dean@googlegroups.com:

He didn\'t end up defending any property at all,

** He certainly did.

You are the same kind of dumbfuck who would defend a cop planting
evidence or setting up a speed trap and then claiming to do one\'s job
as the reason for ignoring the ethics of the act (and criminality in
the first instance).

You can\'t go to a bar looking for a fight, then rile someone up and
provake a response so you can then attack him and or do great harm to
him claiming you were defending yourself.

What that is... is premeditated felony assault.

In a law circles, I believe it is referred to as \"entrapment\" when
someone or a cop sets you up like that.

The immature little putz, Kyle Rittenhouse should never have been
allowed to own a gun at all. Just like alcohol and driving
privileges, we do not allow either until a certain age has been
exceeded. It should really be \"after a certain aptitude level has
been achieved\".
Yet one\'s parent can allow one to smoke cigarettes and drink in thier
presence before the age. In farmlands even drive essential equipment
unlicensed. A gun should be the same way. Keep them from kids until
an established maturity level and age has been achieved. PERIOD. 17
ain\'t it.

This nation\'s educational system decline is largely the fault of
the white supremacist republicans over the last 60 years. Dumb dads
make bad gun owners and their even dumber dumb younguns even worse,
and we are now three generations into a nation with poorly raised
idiots raising their idiots even more poorly then they were raised.
Much less having any gun knowledge.


RittenTard:

Illegal gun Strike one

Load up with FMJ Strike two

Go out and aggressively confront other US citizens with a deadly
weapon over your shoulder Strike three

Utilize said deadly weapon to kill three other US citizens. That
is murder.

This punk motherfucker should never have had a gun to begin with,
and certainly should never be allowed to have one in the future.
When the cops showed up they should have \"taken him out\" in the
interest of public safety if the fucktard was still sporting the
weapon when they got there.