OT:: Is this political or linguistic?

[Clarence]

"Charlie Gibbs" wrote

(Clarence) writes:
"Dirk Bruere at Neopax" wrote
snip

Gee... thanks for sharing that with us.

Your welcome!

Since it wasn't a response to you, now do you understand?

 

[Dan C]

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:37:54 +0000, Clarence wrote:

Since it wasn't a response to you, now do you understand?

Do you know the difference between the words "your" and "you're" ?

Apparently you are the one who doesn't...

--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951

 

[Clarence]

"Pig Bladder" <pig_bladder@anyspammer.org> wrote in message

<snip>

Had nothing to say!

 

[Peter T. Breuer]

In comp.os.linux.networking Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

Nah- he has posted hundreds of messages to SED that indicate large gaps
in knowledge about the US, and he advocates totalitarian government.

He's texan?

Peter

 

[teh Insane Gaymer]

In article <L_Vpd.25697$zx1.6067@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, "Clarence"
<no@No.com> wrote:

"Pig Bladder" <pig_bladder@anyspammer.org> wrote in message

snip

snip ?

 

[Dirk Bruere at Neopax]

Rich The Philosophizer wrote:

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:33:37 +0000, Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:


Clarence wrote:


"Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote in message
news:30k0p4F2v22l1U3@uni-berlin.de...


Rhett Oracle wrote:


Have you ever noticed that "Illuminati" and "Lucifer" both evaluate to
"the one with light"?
Hmmmmm.....

Or that one of the titles of JC is 'Morning Star' who is none other > than

Venus, aka Lucifer?


Dirk


What? No way!

Venus is the goddess of love and beauty, only in the corrupt view of Christian
revisionism could you equate that to Lucifer "The Regent of Earth." No way to
confuse "Sol Invictus" for "Christ" (the Anointed) except by confusing people
with false claims.

From what I can tell, Lucifer is the ancient Greek name of Venus the Morning
Star, but I know nothing about the history of when it was first used in
translations of the Bible to refer to Satan. It seems that the Greeks were
using Lucifer, together with Persephone, to identify Venus long before the name
was used to represent Satan.


From
http://theosophy.org/tlodocs/hpb/HistoryOfAPlanet.htm

The History of a Planet
----------------------------------------------------------
No star, among the countless myriads that twinkle over the sidereal fields
of the night sky, shines so dazzlingly as the planet Venus not even
Sirius-Sothis, the dog-star, beloved by Isis. Venus is the queen among our
planets, the crown jewel of our solar system. She is the inspirer of the poet,
the guardian and companion of the lonely shepherd, the lovely morning and the
evening star. For,

Stars teach as well as shine,"

It's not as simple as that given the trouble YHVH had with the Goddess(es) of
the region who equate to Venus-Aphrodite.
For example, the titles of Mary and her iconic representation is that of
Isis/Astarte etc. They transferred smotthly and almost in totality.

Which makes JC's mother... the Goddess and major opponent of YHVH.

This in turn strengthens the case for Lucifer and JC being (at least) close
relatives if not identical. Which one might expect mythologically speaking as JC
was executed by the most devoted subjects of YHVH.


Lucifer is nothing but denied JHVJ, who has had the assignment of
torturing Mother to get revenge for JHVH's feelings of inadequacy in the
face of the fact that he came out of Mother's hole.

JHVH has clued up, and is reconstituting and redeeming Lucifer now, and
Ahriman too, for that matter, as Mother recovers from her coma caused by
Original Trauma, and comes into Her Own Right as The Mother Of Everything.
And she's recovering from the Asuras too, which are simply nothingness
that's being held in its wrong place. All you have to do to heal them is
undeny.

And I _still_ haven't had one single "taker" - there hasn't been anybody
who has enough confidence/faith in their own convictions to go and visit
http://www.godchannel.com , even if only to refute it!

http://www.kbnet.co.uk/artemis/words/Travels/words.htm

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org

 

[Dork of Lucifer]

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 17:24:14 -0400, teh Insane Gaymer wrote:

In article <L_Vpd.25697$zx1.6067@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, "Clarence"
no@No.com> wrote:


"Pig Bladder" <pig_bladder@anyspammer.org> wrote in message

snip

snip ?

Yeah - it's a "Who can be the stupidest bot troll" contest.

 

[Rhett Auricle]

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 09:21:41 +0100, Peter T. Breuer wrote:

In comp.os.linux.networking Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

John Fields wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 22:51:46 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:
There is no question that simple curtesy is not understood on this NG.
There is so little of it that no one even recognizes it!
Let it go!
If it bothers you, then rather than adding fuel to the fire with your
stupid comments, why don't _you_ just let it go and shut the hell up
for a while?

And what kind of moron spells "curtesy" like that? I'm fairly certain

Well, one who either

a) confuses it with curtsey
b) confuses it with cutesie
c) can't spell courtesy

he's not a product of western culture and that English is not his native

Looks like a native english speaker to me. That's transliterated
english speech, definitely. Just one spelling mistake too! Too bad it
was the subject of the sentence - I guess Murphy is a friend of his.

language. He is some psychopathic refugee from a corrupt US backed
dictatorship that was overthrown somewhere- maybe south Vietnamese.

Yerrrrrrrrrrs. And your tin-foil hat is which side out today? You do
know that without the rice-paper padding, the subsonic waves can get to
you?

Shh! Don't tell Fred about the shielding! You'll spoil all the fun!

;^j
R.