J
John Robertson
Guest
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
John
John
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
John
On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 at 10:30:13 AM UTC+10, John Robertson wrote:
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
Even the Russians could afford to make the quality of the trolling better
than the implausible twaddle that Cursitor Doom posts.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:22:14 -0700, lonmkusch wrote:
While you're deciding, I think I'm going to stroll over to RT for some
good unbiased news.
If you can't see that RT is a zillion times more reputable as a news
source than CNN/NBC/BBC et al, you must be totally blind. Sure they
aren't 100% impartial; no news organisation is. But they are my most
trusted news source even if not yours - until such time as I ever
discover otherwise, of course.
On 24/07/19 03:43, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 at 10:30:13 AM UTC+10, John Robertson wrote:
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
Even the Russians could afford to make the quality of the trolling better
than the implausible twaddle that Cursitor Doom posts.
No need. It is easier to get people to believe big lies.
Local "agit-prop" from a "useful fool".
On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 at 6:35:45 PM UTC+10, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 24/07/19 03:43, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 at 10:30:13 AM UTC+10, John Robertson wrote:
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
Even the Russians could afford to make the quality of the trolling better
than the implausible twaddle that Cursitor Doom posts.
No need. It is easier to get people to believe big lies.
Local "agit-prop" from a "useful fool".
Big lies are one thing. Grotesquely implausible lies are another.
And the proposition that Cursitor Doom might be in any way useful does seem suspect.
On 24/07/19 12:13, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 at 6:35:45 PM UTC+10, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 24/07/19 03:43, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 at 10:30:13 AM UTC+10, John Robertson wrote:
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
Even the Russians could afford to make the quality of the trolling better
than the implausible twaddle that Cursitor Doom posts.
No need. It is easier to get people to believe big lies.
Local "agit-prop" from a "useful fool".
Big lies are one thing. Grotesquely implausible lies are another.
And the proposition that Cursitor Doom might be in any way useful does seem suspect.
Well that depends on ones viewpoint and objectives!
ISTR picking up the phrase "useful fool" from a John le Carre
novel. Other people seem to use the term "useful idiot.
Their version of "useful fool" is "пОНоСнŃĐš Đ´ŃŃĐ°Đş", Anglicised as
"poleznyy durak".
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
John
On Tuesday, July 23, 2019 at 7:30:13 PM UTC-5, John Robertson wrote:
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
John
First of all BOY, his name is Trump. Or are you fucking people going to be like fourth graders and call names ? Fucking GROW UP already.
I'll prove it right now - quote;
"the orange haired one"
That PROVES you walk in with preconceived notions and guess where they come from ?
On Tuesday, July 23, 2019 at 7:30:13 PM UTC-5, John Robertson wrote:
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
John
First of all BOY, his name is Trump. ...
On Tuesday, July 23, 2019 at 7:30:13 PM UTC-5, John Robertson wrote:
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
John
First of all BOY, his name is Trump. Or are you fucking people going to be like fourth graders and call names ? Fucking GROW UP already.
Second of all discard what Slowman says. If he can designa sigle stage common source amp using a JFET he is a savant. (that is three resistors and you can almost pull the values out of a hat) He knows NOTHING about anything else.
Now Cursitor is a different animal and I do not expect the likes of you to understand it but the deal is though he is not well informed (fucking nobody here is as far as I can tell) he has a rather less than popular quality of looking at world event objectively. I do. You can't.
I'll prove it right now - quote;
"the orange haired one"
That PROVES you walk in with preconceived notions and guess where they come from ? The liberal lie factory. Well that doesn't work anymore and you liberals can get this through your head right now - Donald Trump will be president of the US until 2025. And it is because of liberals, and it is because of leftist liberals that he got elected in the first place.
A client of mine is IN the Ohio democrat party, a voting member. he is among those who decides who gets the party's endorsement. he voted for Trump and just might do it again. Another democrat I know of saw the choices between Trump and HRC and went back to bed.
DEMOCRATS GOT TRUMP ELECTED. What is more they have simply doubled down doing what is known not to work. That is the definition of insanity. They're only getting worse. You all smug they got the lower house ? Well they can forget about the senate and they lost a ton of governors and state legislators, and now they are actually worse !
Did you notice that fork sticking out your ass ?
On 24/07/19 01:30, John Robertson wrote:
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
His behaviour is one that I would expect from a classic
Russian false-flag propaganda machine. Think of it as
"agit-prop lite".
He is on record as thinking Russia Today is one of
the most trustworthy news sources, viz:
On 31/08/17 22:59, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:22:14 -0700, lonmkusch wrote:
While you're deciding, I think I'm going to stroll over to RT for some
good unbiased news.
If you can't see that RT is a zillion times more reputable as a news
source than CNN/NBC/BBC et al, you must be totally blind. Sure they
aren't 100% impartial; no news organisation is. But they are my most
trusted news source even if not yours - until such time as I ever
discover otherwise, of course.
A client of mine is IN the Ohio democrat party, a voting member. he is among those who decides who gets the party's endorsement. he voted for Trump and just might do it again. Another democrat I know of saw the choices between Trump and HRC and went back to bed.
Jurb keeps deplorable company.
On 7/24/19 4:34 AM, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 24/07/19 01:30, John Robertson wrote:
He complains almost as much as the orange haired one.
His behaviour is one that I would expect from a classic
Russian false-flag propaganda machine. Think of it as
"agit-prop lite".
He is on record as thinking Russia Today is one of
the most trustworthy news sources, viz:
On 31/08/17 22:59, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:22:14 -0700, lonmkusch wrote:
While you're deciding, I think I'm going to stroll over to RT for some
good unbiased news.
If you can't see that RT is a zillion times more reputable as a news
source than CNN/NBC/BBC et al, you must be totally blind. Sure they
aren't 100% impartial; no news organisation is. But they are my most
trusted news source even if not yours - until such time as I ever
discover otherwise, of course.
pretty sure he's been saying the same kind of things on Usenet for well
over a decade under different names.
If he has a new gig now he must be careful or will surely bring great
shame to Republic and be sent to work camp in forest! Đ˝Ń ŃŃ Đ´Đ°ŃŃŃ!
Anyways, I did on occasion read rt.com still do so every now an then
to see the view from the other less hysterical side,
and I read many more news sources just to keep an overview of what humming-beans are up to these days.
On 26/07/19 08:08, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Anyways, I did on occasion read rt.com still do so every now an then
to see the view from the other less hysterical side,
and I read many more news sources just to keep an overview of what humming-beans are up to these days.
Yes, always valuable, and it is more difficult to do that
in the US than in Europe. Classic point: in the US "foreign"
news often means "news from a different state"!
Why the fear for Russia?
Because I went through the iron curtain 6 times, and know
someone that was forced to crawl under it.
The last time it wasn't quite that, since I was on business
in Berlin less than a week after the wall fell; the entire
city was in a daze that was probably like that at the end
of WW2.
I an friends also personally tested the West's standard
propaganda both personally - and found it to be accurate.
Nothing significant has changed since then; they continue
to be a threat.
You should have fear of Agent Orange.
Indeed.
But that doesn't mean we shouldn't be afraid of Russia.
Putin is clever and thinks strategically, unlike our
clowns.