B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Sunday, April 12, 2020 at 2:02:35 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
The bat corona virus in question may have showed up in blood sample from a bat collected a long way away, but all bats are hosts to a range of corona viruses, so it doesn't signify much to anybody except rabid conspiracy theory buffs.
Flyguy is a bit further down the pecking order than that, but he is susceptible to every idiot fantasy going around.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Monday, April 6, 2020 at 9:32:47 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Monday, April 6, 2020 at 8:18:08 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 07:01:58 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
ggherold@gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting, thanks Phil. Some lab screw-up seems as likely as
some meat market transmission.
Some lab tech could have picked up the virus from one of many samples,
and then gone grocery shopping after work.
Well, not in the bio labs I've known. The nearby lab does, however,
offer a coincidence that can fuel rumor, and such a rumor possibility would explain
the early-days suppression of the virus news. Once the officials recognized
the new disease, info flowed freely (because, in a pandemic, that's the safest
way to proceed).
I'd think that free trade across the US-Canada border, in addition to being in accord with
treaty, would also be safest.
More than a coincidence - the bat in question was not sold in the wet market, it came from 600 miles away from samples collected by a researcher at the Wuhan lab.
The bat corona virus in question may have showed up in blood sample from a bat collected a long way away, but all bats are hosts to a range of corona viruses, so it doesn't signify much to anybody except rabid conspiracy theory buffs.
Flyguy is a bit further down the pecking order than that, but he is susceptible to every idiot fantasy going around.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney